What's new

50 reasons Pakistan needs Musharraf

But surely foreign direct investment could have been a lot more. If you see the FDI in our region, you can see most of the countries performed better than us and attracted more foreign investors than us

FDI could have been exponentially higher but do remember that there was/is a war going on in our neighborhood and the affects it could have on our nation. Thus it would have made many investors wary of entering a market where there could be serious repercussions because of any spillover as it happened.

Good, at least you accepted that the figures were exaggerated and thats exactly my point was. I was pissed off by looking 70 billion dollars of investment in CNG which could never been true.... i would have rather ignored this thread if i had not read that part

The FDI fell drastically in 2009 thanks to the Judges movement that brought the whole nation on streets and paved the way for the foreign investors to pack up and run away from this country. (One of the silliest act by General retired Parvez Musharraf). Also the economic turmoil caused the nation to close their international branches and bring the investment back to their headquarters (for example Halifax bank).

The tussle with the judges was unnecessary and could have been handled better, it just added another major problem to the already basket full that we have.

Well these are all hypothetical statements...He stayed in the government for 9 years right? Still could not convince one dealer to sign an agreement for the coal projects? He did sign several Memorandum of Understandings but never did he successfully signed any deal.

He raised a voice for Kalabagh dam that is still under jeopardy. The question is not what he had done if he had stayed in the government...the question is what has he done in his 9 years tenure when he was given a chance to actually DO something.

You should be aware that as a President, he was overlooking a number of things and the major project that we actually got completed was the Gwadar port project. The others were difficult to implement because of underlying reasons. For example the coal that we have in abundance is low quality and preliminary tests took place before anything concrete can occur. At least the steps were taken and the right direction taken for utilizing our sources.

Yes it is....But my point is..... show what is true
Not the fake reports
Stick with the correct stats and figures and thats what i am arguing about

We are talking politics here, how can you not add a little here and there to make your campaign stronger.

Hate the game, don't hate the players. :D

Well the other leaders are corrupt too and I personally do not like any political party in Pakistan. But at least they came democratically.... at least the elections were held in the country and they were chosen by the public unlike.....Mr Former President

I am all for a democracy flourishing in our country that is why I would prefer Musharraf to the current crop but in a democratic setup.

Well not really, the suicide bombs started taking place right after the WoT and increased in multi folds after the lal Masjid operation. I personally believe he did the right thing by crushing those terrorists but even matter was not handled properly

Look at the number of suicide attacks sharply increased after the Lal-Masjid operation

I agree with your sentiments but Lal Masjid was a bubble waiting to burst and the correct steps should have been taken in the 90's to curb the growth of extremism in this manner.

Read this report from Transparency International (if you haven't read already) and you will be amazed by the facts mentioned about Pakistan.

Hotfile.com: One click file hosting: t-faz.pdf

Thanks for the file, it is a good read.
 
Dear T-Faz, just let him come to Pakistan and preach these 50 achivements to people of pakistan and see what response he will get from people of pakistan.

Iam holding my breath for his return, lets see on live tv how people of pakistan greets him or may be some people in uniform will greet him on some obscure helipad on unknown location.

Lets see how the media which he librated greets him.

Lets see weather he chooses to live among pakistani's or behind GHQ wall for protection from the very people he wants to save.

Lets see weather he can walk without the Besaki of GHQ.

Yup,

Its a waiting game and we will see how things play out. But if a man like Zardari can occupy the post of a President in this country then anything is possible.
 
Musharraf has been pretty explicit in saying that he'll return to fight the 2013 elections (if that's when they're held, could be sooner).

He's also said he'll dedicate his time in building the party for that occasion. Those expecting him to return in the next month or so are jumping the gun IMO.

It'll be a long time before he sets foot on Pakistani soil (I see it being in excess of a year). It's a bubbling cauldron at the moment. He'll wait until things simmer down before announcing his return.

In the meantime, everything will be co-ordinated from overseas to beef up his campaign and awareness. It's a lengthy process and he knows it.
 
A land beyond the power of miracles​



Ayaz Amir
Only a miracle can turn around a situation rooted in 63 years of drift and apathy. Pakistan was taken over by a clutch of lacklustre leaders soon after the British presided over the break-up of the sub-continent and gifted independence to us. We are still in their clutches. Nothing else explains the never-ending circus which passes for the running of national affairs in Islamabad, and its various decrepit institutions.
Only an unbalanced nation would cultivate mass poverty and an extended nuclear programme at one and the same time. To us belongs this distinction and we find no anomaly in it. If the god or goddess called national security had the highest and most shining temple anywhere it would have to be in the wastes of the Islamic Republic.
Ten nuclear devices, unpacked but ready for use, would be enough to guarantee us nuclear security. We have dozens more and are yet unsatisfied. Our national security mindset is about the same as North Korea's.
If the army which we call our pride, its cantonments running in an unbroken string from Peshawar to the sea, is not enough to give us a sense of security not all the toys in the world ever will.
What kind of education is imparted in our military academies, including that biggest white elephant of all, the National Defence University, its rector chosen by the army chief from amongst the 25-35 lieutenant generals whose red tabs adorn the national skyline?
Strategy is a word which should be excised from the national dictionary. At its altar we have produced one disaster after another. Among the steps urgently needed to preserve what remains of national sanity, is an end to strategic studies for at least the next ten years. If our various Afghan jehads are the highest tribute we can pay to strategy we are best off without this encumbrance.
Pakistan needs not a truth and reconciliation commission – there is nothing to reconcile except our various brands of folly – but a cleansing commission. At its bar must be brought all the geniuses who contributed to our Afghan, Kashmir and Kargil miracles. Musharraf's punishment should be a short stay on Kargil's highest peak, on our side of the Line of Control, with army rations to survive on. And no Black Label, please. At least, we won't have to suffer his interviews any more.
Newspapers are becoming a bore. When I picked up my six newspapers this morning there was nothing remotely worthwhile to read in them. The same endless goings-on in the Supreme Court. There is something known as the closing of accounts, a resort to the guillotine – even if I use this word in a metaphorical sense – to bring matters to a close. Obviously, its meaning has yet to dawn on our brightest and most pompous minds.
Talk-shows, the whole lot them, have become another bore. They are attuned to the manufacturing of crises, anchor-persons desperate to look for depth in the most banal of happenings. I think the ones attracting an audience are the ones where the anchors are somewhat more optically-gifted.
There are some persons born for talk-shows. They can always be seen looking very angry, gesticulating and endlessly talking. More power to their voices. The Pakistani revolution when it comes – although trust me, it never will – will have to think seriously about this endless stream of talk.
All the evidence suggests that the first spoon put in the nation's mouth at the time of its founding was dedicated to its vocal chords. It has stayed this way down the years: a republic finding its highest expression in ceaseless babble, its favourite tense the future tense – we will do this, we will do that, we will bring about a revolution – never anything in the present tense.
A day after the outbreak of the Bolshevik Revolution (Nov 7, 1917) when the Congress of Soviet Deputies met, the guard on duty, bored to death by the endless proceedings, marched inside the chamber and said they were tired. That was the first and last time the Congress ever met. Watching the enduring soap-show which passes for national politics, I am tempted to think of similar remedies. Although I know they will never be attempted.
I am no cricketing fan and must not have watched a cricket match in years. But a headline has just caught my eyes: Shoaib Akhtar says he is fit enough to bowl for another four years. Can the nation not be spared any more of this horror story? All our national resources put together are helpless before this sporting hero. The nation as a whole is helpless before the might of the plastic shopping bag, which will clog our water channels and destroy us more effectively than the Taliban. How do we fix bigger problems, how do we restructure the Republic? Fat chance of the last happening.
Reforming the Republic is a hopeless undertaking. We are unfit for it and deserve every bit of the characters who pass as our national leadership class. Looking at Musharraf on television triggers the thought: was this the clown whose antics we had to put up with for close to nine years? Master of all he surveyed, making up for the austerity of his army years by splurging on the good life when he assumed high office. The only thing I envy him are his several mistresses, one or two of whom I have seen protesting too much.
Whatever the feminist movement, for which I have the greatest admiration, may like to think of itself, for women, except for those with an honoured placed in the hierarchy of virtue, power remains the ultimate aphrodisiac. Otherwise, it stretches the imagination to see anyone honestly seeking the aging commando's company.
Looking at E M Forster, who was gay, Virginia Woolf said the middle age of such people was not to be contemplated without horror. The dictum also fits aging dictators with a taste for the good life. King Farouk of Egypt in Roman exile, gorging himself on endless packets of potato chips and bottles of coke, Musharraf in exile dreaming of a power comeback. These too are horror stories, inviting endless cogitations on the triumph and loss of power.
Churchill could not have survived without his newspaper and book earnings. He wrote all the time to pay for the upkeep of his Sussex estate which he had bought for 5,000 pounds in the early part of the last century. Although a certified aristocrat he inherited nothing from his parents (they conduct these things better in those climes). When he stepped down as prime minister, Attlee wrote newspaper articles to survive. Harold Wilson as a member of the House of Lords would regularly attend its sessions only for the daily allowance which this brought him.
Tell me not about Emperor Aurangzeb stitching caps and copying the Quran to earn his keep. If ever there was an apocryphal story it is this. Aurangzeb was too busy fighting a ceaseless stream of enemies to have much time for such deeds of piety. We Muslims never learnt the art of peaceful succession. At the death of every king there was a war of succession. Aurangzeb had his elder brother Dara Shikoh killed and if Manucci's tale is to believed, sent Dara's head in a covered silver dish to his father, Shahjehan, imprisoned in Agra Fort. And he is revered amongst us as one of our holiest warriors. (Why isn't a missile named after him?)
Why has political stability eluded Pakistan? Does this have something to do with our historic origins? By 1739, barely 30 years after the death of Aurangzeb, the once mighty Mughal empire was weakened so much that the Persian invader, Nadir Shah, could pillage Delhi with ease (and pick the girls of his choice from the Red Fort's extended harem). Ancient warfare had its rewarding aspects. Modern warfare, drones and all, is singularly colourless. And we are caught in a war whose happy ending no one can see.
 
Pakistan needs not a truth and reconciliation commission – there is nothing to reconcile except our various brands of folly – but a cleansing commission. At its bar must be brought all the geniuses who contributed to our Afghan, Kashmir and Kargil miracles. Musharraf's punishment should be a short stay on Kargil's highest peak, on our side of the Line of Control, with army rations to survive on. And no Black Label, please. At least, we won't have to suffer his interviews any more.
Wah ji wah, an article critical of the Army by Ayaz Amir (no surprise there), and a good few personal digs at Musharraf (no surprise there).

Cleansing commission you say Mr Amir? Does that include cleansing us Pakistani's of the likes of the corrupt and despotic Sharif brothers?

Oh no, of course not, you're a member of their party. How silly of me. Tackle that one first you hypocrite, (and your party's love of fake degrees), and then bark your repetitive and boring yarn about the Army.
 
The way I see it, anyone is better than the current government. I would personally favour Imran Khan to play a vital role in Pakistan as a President or Prime Minister, if not, then Musharraf. Running a country needs a spine and strong character, both of which are missing in the current rulers. It doesn't really matter whether it is Musharraf or Khan, the current government is certainly not qualified to run a country as important as Pakistan. The PPP had just one ace in their deck; Benizir Bhutto. Now that she is gone, their political party has lost the meat from the broth.
Benizir's son is, frankly, seen as a joke in England. People laughed when he was named the next party leader. He is nothing more than an alcoholic slacker (much like his father). If he does play a serious role in the political affairs of Pakistan in the future, I for one will lose all respect for Pakistanis. However, I doubt any Pakistani with any amount of common sense will actually vote for him if he runs as a candidate.
 
Just take a look and compare the situation between when Musharraf took over from NS and what the situation was on… the day of twin tower bombings on 9/11. These figures are taken from the Federal Bureau of Statistics, between. (FY stands for fiscal year)

When mush displaced NS in FY99 the GDP was 4.2% whereas on the day of the bombings in FY01 it stood at 2.2 %.
The net foreign investment fell from $499 million in FY99 to $182 million in FY01.
The tax revenue-GDP ratio fell from 13.3% in FY99 to 12.9% in FY01.
The total debt plus explicit liabilities rose from 104.7% of GDP in FY99 to 113.5% in FY01.
The rupee depreciated by 18.6% in FY01, the highest fall since 1982 in any financial year.
The foreign exchange reserves with the SBP fell from $1662.7 million in FY99 to $991 million in FY00.
The agriculture sector recorded a negative growth of 2.7% in FY01.
The budgetary deficit which stood at 6.1% in FY99 rose to 6.6% in FY00.
The unemployment rate of 5.89%, which the military government inherited from Nawaz govt, reached 7.82% in FY01.

*These negative trends clearly show the failure of economic policies of the military government. The improvement of which the government now boasts so flagrantly was only possible after the unfortunate events of the September 11.*
50 reasons Pakistan needs Musharraf – The Express Tribune Blog
 
It was not Musharraf that did these things :)
It was the men he employed in the govt. positions that did these things
Any other sincere honest leader can do a better job then him :)
 
One only wonders what this TFaz is all about. He has himself acknowledged that Musharaf was corrupt. Yet TFaz still wants him. I cant seem to put my finger on this. Anyone else knows what this is all about feel free to drop me a line in private. TFaz related to Musharaf... anyone?
 

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom