Falcon29
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 31,647
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
My answer was in response to you 'subjagating' others comment,lol.Delusions of grandeur.Tell me this simple question.why are you people so inept that tiny israel humiliated you on every occasion?Seriously you couldn't defeat them even when u were united like in 48,67,73.Launched attacks from 3 directions and failed badly despite material superiority.
If people seek revenge, they will have option in future. Not only Muslims, many have been subjugated by the West. Again you're misinformed individual that has no knowledge on Arab affairs let alone facts regarding Arab-Israeli wars. In 48, armies were very inequipped, and Palestinian fighters were told to withdraw from battle. No volunteers were allowed to fight, Israeli's were Russian and European Jews who fought in world war and had better training/experience. Arab military commands were not united, they didn't fight to retreive all Palestinian land but prevent Jewish terrorist expansion into further Palestinian territory. 67 was an Israeli attack of aggression on Egypt assisted by Jordan. 73 was a an Egyptian-Israeli war in which Egypt succeeded in its objectives for war. You need to spend some time reading or stick to your degenarate lifestyle. Arabs had no military superiority either. No ever tried dismanlting the state of Israel, this twist is only applied by neocon revisionists. All wars had set out goals, 48 was defensive. 67 was defensive, even though Jordanian military command and royal family were in on it and were assigned with task of demoralizing Arabs from their defensive struggle against Israel. 'Defeat' to you is dismanlting the Israeli state and replacing it with an Arab regime. That was never the goal, so you will keep claiming Israel was never 'defeated' as long as you define it in that manner. That approach is not taken with all past historical wars.