What's new

4 reasons why India was the one that started provocation at China-India border

. .
Among all territory disputes, everyone just claims they are the victim. This is common sense. It's not rational choice to believe words from either side. What you should do is to analyze who would make a profit from the event. I believe India is the trouble maker in LAC. Here are the reasons:

1, US, the only super power, is doing all its best to contain China now. China is focusing its resouces to deal with all attacks from US and its pawns(Australia Canda for example). It's definitely not a good time for China to start a new front line with India. On the other hand, right now it's a golden time for India to take advantage of this China-US tension.
2, Modi has to resort to nationalism to minimize his prolitical pressure from his failur in the Covid-19 war.
3, India wants to impress US how important it is in the containing China game. In return India hopes to gain more profit from US.
4, India knows the west media would always blame China as long as there is anything related to China. India's invasion has zero moral loss(at least in the West mind) and adds one more “criminal evidence" to China. This is "kill two birds with one stone" move for India.

China needs to understand a few basic traits of Indians brahamins. When I say traits, I mean this is in the DNA structure and cannot be changed. These traits are:

1- Shameless
2- Absolutely NO integrity and hence will ALWAYS Lie.
3- When they know they cannot win, they will beg for mercy. They will bow before you. They will ask for more time. But what they are doing is that they are BUYING time so that they can strike back.
4- They can do any act, can kill anyone, and do anything if it suits them.

Now, coming to the point - If today China shows them any mercy, shows them any leniency, I can say with 1000% certainty that China will suffer immensely at the hands of the indians in the future. Hence I say to the Chinese Leaders, do not miss this opportunity to take care of India or you will regret it for many centuries !
 
.
Lol! You think sat images are read in this way?:lol:
You only believe what your media told you. Did you saw what really happened by your eyes? No.
China needs to understand a few basic traits of Indians brahamins. When I say traits, I mean this is in the DNA structure and cannot be changed. These traits are:

1- Shameless
2- Absolutely NO integrity and hence will ALWAYS Lie.
3- When they know they cannot win, they will beg for mercy. They will bow before you. They will ask for more time. But what they are doing is that they are BUYING time so that they can strike back.
4- They can do any act, can kill anyone, and do anything if it suits them.

Now, coming to the point - If today China shows them any mercy, shows them any leniency, I can say with 1000% certainty that China will suffer immensely at the hands of the indians in the future. Hence I say to the Chinese Leaders, do not miss this opportunity to take care of India or you will regret it for many centuries !
Firstly Indians cross the line. And build bunkers to consolidate what they gained. Then if nothing happens, they will repeat the process later. This is "Forward Policy" 2.0. We call it worm bite tactic.

depositphotos_161863604-stock-photo-worm-or-caterpillar-eating-leaf.jpg
 
.
You only believe what your media told you. Did you saw what really happened by your eyes? No.
Firstly Indians cross the line. And build bunkers to consolidate what they gained. Then if nothing happens, they will repeat the process later. This is "Forward Policy" 2.0. We call it worm bite tactic.

View attachment 639153
It means you went to the LAC and saw everything by yourself?
 
. . . .
On China side, the reports said India crossed the line and built many new bunkers. India broke status quo. China had to destruct these bunkers.


It all depends how to interpret LAC. In Chinese mind, it is "1962-line" which Chinese reached and stationed during and after 1962 border war. In Indian's mind, it is the line prior to the border war. The different perceptions created an overlapping claimed area that both sides can accuse each other of intrusion into.

China should never have withdrawn back (by 20 km as per Mao's order) from the line it has reached during the war. China was just too naive to believe India would have treated China with the same courtesy. BIG mistake.
 
.
India has been constantly provoking all of her neighbours.

Unlike the smaller countries, China can stand up to Indian bullying in the region.

every country does it , china did it with taiwan and vietnam .china is no saint .
 
.
India joining western coalition is actually great news. For a long time, Indian policy was to be non-aligned and they made strategic decisions independently. Now that India is part of Indo-Pacific, US will be calling the shots and telling them what to do, so India will become a lot more predictable now for China. Obviously no Indian is ever gonna admit it, but its pretty clear Indo-Pacific has no other purpose than to contain China. Now that India is in US puppet bloc, China don't have to act restrained or hold back anymore. Now China has the pretext to openly act against India which has openly sided with the west anti-China bloc.

I think China vs India is indicative of a broader showdown to see who will come out supreme: East vs West.

China is betting on itself, India is betting on west. Betting on someone else to help you is always a losing battle, so I think China will come out on top. And that will be good news for China's allies like Russia and Pakistan, India's loss will be bad news for US and Japan.

US is not a declining power yet but they are getting there. India betting on a declining power sounds like a recipe for major strategic failure in the long-term. India might think they have scored it big by being a big player on US team but it will become a big liability if their team loses. If India joined China/Russia bloc, they would be behind China and Russia but India would still be on the rising team while US is on declining team. India should've followed what Russia is doing. Russia is a competitor of China, but Russia can see that it will be more beneficial to be ally of China even if they are rivals since China is the rising team. So Russia put aside their differences with China to focus on common enemy which is US and Russia has benefitted immensely from rise of China. India has taken a big risk by betting against a rising China and joining declining US, if it it backfires, it will be a major liability for India in a few decades, and they will pay a heavy price since China is a dragon on India's doorstep.

India should have swallowed their ego and accepted its better to be ally of rising China like Russia because it would be better for them. Instead they have dealt with the devil and joined the US, one day they will pay the price for this mistake like every country that has made the mistake of trusting the US. Pakistan learned its lesson many years ago, now Pakistan does bare minimum to stay in good books of US but never trusts US for anything, only trust China. US never has interest of any country but itself, it is better for India to keep good relations with a neighbor like China.

It is better to be a slave on a rising ship than the captain of a sinking ship.

It's a big gamble but Modi has thrown everything in with the anti-China bet.

The big risk is that if China is not contained and the US position deteriorates further, China and India may end up getting into a war where China could just seize India's chicken neck and take away the Northeast territories. The people in these territories would probably welcome Chinese citizenship since they get treated like shit by India and are labeled Chinkies. China would actually build infrastructure in these regions and they'd be grateful.
 
.
It's a big gamble but Modi has thrown everything in with the anti-China bet.

The big risk is that if China is not contained and the US position deteriorates further, China and India may end up getting into a war where China could just seize India's chicken neck and take away the Northeast territories. The people in these territories would probably welcome Chinese citizenship since they get treated like shit by India and are labeled Chinkies. China would actually build infrastructure in these regions and they'd be grateful.
Indians should know starting a war with China is risky. Losing war(quite likely) doesn't mean going back where you were from. It means territory loss. China will retake South Tibet. And NE India will be a pro China independent country.
 
Last edited:
.
Indians should to know starting a war with China is risky. Losing war(quite likely) doesn't mean going back where you were from. It means territory loss. China will retake South Tibet. And NE India will be a pro China independent country.

NE Indians really get treated like shit. Their lives would be 10000X improved if they were assimilated into China. They'd probably realize how awful their lives were under India after 30 years of Chinese rule and be among the most loyal citizens to the PRC.
 
. .
Among all territory disputes, everyone just claims they are the victim. This is common sense. It's not rational choice to believe words from either side. What you should do is to analyze who would make a profit from the event. I believe India is the trouble maker in LAC. Here are the reasons:

1, US, the only super power, is doing all its best to contain China now. China is focusing its resouces to deal with all attacks from US and its pawns(Australia Canda for example). It's definitely not a good time for China to start a new front line with India. On the other hand, right now it's a golden time for India to take advantage of this China-US tension.
2, Modi has to resort to nationalism to minimize his prolitical pressure from his failur in the Covid-19 war.
3, India wants to impress US how important it is in the containing China game. In return India hopes to gain more profit from US.
4, India knows the west media would always blame China as long as there is anything related to China. India's invasion has zero moral loss(at least in the West mind) and adds one more “criminal evidence" to China. This is "kill two birds with one stone" move for India.

Reasons why India did not initiate this:

1) Modi has just won an election last year. The next elections are 4 years away

2) Indian voters get influenced by Pakistan only. Many Indians do not even know much about China or the dispute with China. If Modi needs help politically then it would be a war with Pakistan and certainly not with China

3) Indian military is at weakest in history

4) Indian economy is in doll drums due to COVID-19. No one in India is interested in a war at this time.

5) Based on the experience from 1962 war with China, Indians know that no one will come to India's rescue in a war with China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom