What's new

18.7% of Total Tax Revenue Goes to Pensioners: Study

Morpheus

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
3,060
Reaction score
-1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
18.7% of Total Tax Revenue Goes to Pensioners: Study

Posted 3 mins ago by Abdul Rahman

704741_9363304_mm1_magazine.jpg


The overall pension spending as a share of tax revenue has reached 18.7 percent as of the financial year 2019- 20, which is equal to 2.2 percent of the GDP and almost double the level a decade earlier, according to a study published by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).

If this proportion continues to grow, it could result in the crowding out of other valuable spending avenues. Pension spending as a percent of total budgeted expenditures for FY20 exceeded health and education spending on both federal and provincial fronts and is almost half the level of consolidated development expenditures, the study stated.


In this regard, International Financial Institutions (IFIs), such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have also started flagging the rising pension expenditure as a pressing concern for Pakistan’s debt sustainability.
However, the fact that pension expenditure is expected to rise further going forward, given the increase in retiree headcount and the lifespan of future retirees, is even more concerning. If fiscal revenues continue on their existing trajectory, the rising pace of pension-related spending would become worrying from a sustainability point of view.

According to the World Bank’s projections, civil service pension payments would overtake wage expenditures by 2023 in Punjab and by 2028 in Sindh, and may also come near to the level of wage expenditures in the Federal Government by around 2050.

The study pointed out that the pension expenditure at the Federal level has risen by a CAGR of 18 percent in Pakistan during FY11-21. Provincial pension expenditure has also witnessed a similar surge.

Within consolidated pension expenditures, civil pensions (including federal and provincial) constituted 63.2 percent, whereas military pensions made up around 36.8 percent on average during the last five years.

In Pakistan, the absolute level of old-age income support coverage is on the lower side. For instance, the pensions to GDP ratio stands at just 2.2 percent while the proportion of the population participating in programs that provide old-age contributory pensions, health, and/or social security insurance is only 5.9 percent, which is much lower than the developing economies average of 20.3 percent.

The old-age dependency ratio, i.e., the number of people aged 65 and above, compared to the number of working-age people, which is 8.5 percent, and is expected to rise only marginally to 11.2 percent by 2040, it added.
But even with such low pension coverage in the country, reforms to public pensions have become unavoidable in Pakistan in the face of the worrying acceleration in the associated public sector spending witnessed over the last decade.

This is principal because public pensions are unfunded and thus are burdening the already tight fiscal revenue situation.

Current Pension Structure in Pakistan

In its current form, the pension structure is a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) model. Under which, the government guarantees pensions and other retirement benefits to employees who do not make personal contributions from their salaries.
Another element that seems unique in the public sector pension structure of Pakistan is that alongside the existing pensioners, future retirees (current employees) are also entitled to enjoy the benefits of contemporaneous pension increments announced by the government.


In other words, once an employee retires from civil/public service, she/he will be able to receive all pension benefits accumulated (due to retrospective increases announced in previous years) on the latest drawn salary.
For instance, an employee retiring in FY19 will also receive the increment of 15 percent announced by the government in the year FY12, 7.5 percent in FY16, 10 percent in FY17, 10 percent in FY18, and 10 percent in FY19.

Moreover, it is also important to note that even this retrospective increase in future pension is at the discretion of the government. For instance, in some years like FY08 and FY09, the pension increase was only offered to current pensioners without any adjustments for future retirees, whereas in years FY12, FY16, FY17, FY18, and FY19, the equal increment was offered to current and future pensioners.

Similarly, the government can also discontinue these rates at any time for future retirees. These ad-hoc adjustments in pension increment provide minimum certainty to future retirees, the study reported.
In case of death of an in-service or a retired worker, the eligible family members are authorized to draw pension and allied benefits at the rate of 75 percent of the net pension until marriage or death (more on this later).

The amount of pension is usually determined by the length of completed years of qualifying service of the concerned employee. Once the employee has completed 25 years of service and/or becomes 60 years of age, he/she can receive a pension amount equivalent to 70 percent of the last pay/emoluments drawn, including special pay and other allowances. The incidence of completing 25 years of service before turning 60 is particularly prominent with regards to BPS 1-16 officers as well as employees in the police departments and the armed forces.

In case the qualifying service is greater than ten years, but less than 30 years, the pension is calculated at a prescribed rate according to the length of service.
The pensioner can also avail of the commutation option, according to which, he/she can avail in advance a maximum of 35 percent of gross pension for several years according to the commutation table set by the government.
In Pakistan, however, the government uses an unstructured approach to adjust the yearly pension increments and increases the assigned benefits in an ad-hoc manner.
There are five major factors why pension-related spending in the country is increasing at a worrying pace. These include:
  • ad-hoc and retrospective increments in pensions announced by the government
  • commutation and restoration facilities offered to pensioners
  • early retirements
  • generous survivorship benefits
  • a high replacement rate
Pension System Needs Structured Reforms

The public pension expenditure in Pakistan is on the path of becoming unsustainable. While limited fiscal space is a major reason why increasing pension spending is worrisome, improvements in the pension framework can substantially help make future payments manageable.

Eliminating the generous retrospective increments and reducing the list of dependents eligible for pension payments appear as quick and easy-to-implement measures. The concerned authorities must carry out specialized evaluation exercises at their own end and implement the required legislative reforms accordingly.
Finally, it is important to undertake a periodic review of implemented reforms in order to ensure the long-term sustainability of the pension structure.

Once the features of the current pension structure are successfully streamlined through sufficient parametric restructuring, the next step would be the adoption of comprehensive systemic reform to ensure the fiscal sustainability of pension liabilities in the long-run.

In this process, the current non-contributed, defined-benefit, and pay-as-you-go pension scheme would need to be gradually phased out and replaced with a contributory and funded structure in which the benefits are closely linked with the value of pre-retirement contributions, the study concluded.

++++++++++++++++


 
Pensioners spend money in the country, soo boosting economy. Overtime pension will have to be raised through.

Edit. Meant pension age should be raised
 
Last edited:
Another one of those miracles of Pakistan. Do corruption all your life, get commissions in thekas, unionize and increase base salaries when required, threaten payya jam if the govt thinks of firing you, and after all that, comfortably retire on the taxpayers dime.

How necessary are pension reforms? - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

" The pay-pension premium of government service vis-a-vis private employment in Pakistan was a whopping 49pc in 2014 against minus-4pc in the United States. It means government employees earn on average about 49pc more than their counterparts in the private sector whereas private-sector employees in the United States earn 4pc more than public servants. "

What a clusterfuck.
 
Though this year Govt didn't increase pension amount but moving forward they would need to create slots. Anyone having more than Rs 60,000 monthly pension, shouldn't get an increase at all (like they always used to have 10% increase per year). Rs 60,000 for an old couple is more than enough to live. Surely their kids will be sharing the burden as well and not living on it. Where as the increase should be annually 2% for higher slots and 5% for lower ones.
 
Last edited:
So is military pension more or the governments employee?
 
So is military pension more or the governments employee?
Same. Anyone earning more than Rs 60,000 monthly pension, be it govt employee or retired solider, shouldn't get a hike. Infact not even Rs 60,000 , cutoff should be Rs 50,000. May be a 5% hike after every 4 years. Those retired employees whose monthly pension is more than Rs 125,000 should get a decrease of Rs 25,000. I know people won't appreciate this but this is the only way to bring some sense in whopping pension reimbursement budget.
 
Pension culture needs to be abolished worldwide. Especially in struggling economies. It's like a time bomb ticking every second.
 
Well the govt should first focus on military pension as most retire at young age, do private jobs and take pension as well. Civilians retire at 60 and thus not much time left.
Also the retirement age should be increased. Pension is not a bad thing as its spent by the people inside the country.
 
Another one of those miracles of Pakistan. Do corruption all your life, get commissions in thekas, unionize and increase base salaries when required, threaten payya jam if the govt thinks of firing you, and after all that, comfortably retire on the taxpayers dime.

How necessary are pension reforms? - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

" The pay-pension premium of government service vis-a-vis private employment in Pakistan was a whopping 49pc in 2014 against minus-4pc in the United States. It means government employees earn on average about 49pc more than their counterparts in the private sector whereas private-sector employees in the United States earn 4pc more than public servants. "

What a clusterfuck.
Government is giving me less than half of my private salary even though my department has best salaries in Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
Posters who are calling for genocide of the pensioner community should be ashamed.

Government should increase the pension directly proportional to inflation. These people are governments first priority. A tier system should be adopted for increaments. Pensioners should be provided ample means of living debt free.
Another one of those miracles of Pakistan. Do corruption all your life, get commissions in thekas, unionize and increase base salaries when required, threaten payya jam if the govt thinks of firing you, and after all that, comfortably retire on the taxpayers dime.

How necessary are pension reforms? - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

" The pay-pension premium of government service vis-a-vis private employment in Pakistan was a whopping 49pc in 2014 against minus-4pc in the United States. It means government employees earn on average about 49pc more than their counterparts in the private sector whereas private-sector employees in the United States earn 4pc more than public servants. "

What a clusterfuck.

You would tax air if left to your instinct.

Very brave of you to take on retired clerks, mailman, teachers and government handyman.
 
18.7% of Total Tax Revenue Goes to Pensioners: Study

Posted 3 mins ago by Abdul Rahman

704741_9363304_mm1_magazine.jpg


The overall pension spending as a share of tax revenue has reached 18.7 percent as of the financial year 2019- 20, which is equal to 2.2 percent of the GDP and almost double the level a decade earlier, according to a study published by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).

If this proportion continues to grow, it could result in the crowding out of other valuable spending avenues. Pension spending as a percent of total budgeted expenditures for FY20 exceeded health and education spending on both federal and provincial fronts and is almost half the level of consolidated development expenditures, the study stated.


In this regard, International Financial Institutions (IFIs), such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have also started flagging the rising pension expenditure as a pressing concern for Pakistan’s debt sustainability.
However, the fact that pension expenditure is expected to rise further going forward, given the increase in retiree headcount and the lifespan of future retirees, is even more concerning. If fiscal revenues continue on their existing trajectory, the rising pace of pension-related spending would become worrying from a sustainability point of view.

According to the World Bank’s projections, civil service pension payments would overtake wage expenditures by 2023 in Punjab and by 2028 in Sindh, and may also come near to the level of wage expenditures in the Federal Government by around 2050.

The study pointed out that the pension expenditure at the Federal level has risen by a CAGR of 18 percent in Pakistan during FY11-21. Provincial pension expenditure has also witnessed a similar surge.

Within consolidated pension expenditures, civil pensions (including federal and provincial) constituted 63.2 percent, whereas military pensions made up around 36.8 percent on average during the last five years.

In Pakistan, the absolute level of old-age income support coverage is on the lower side. For instance, the pensions to GDP ratio stands at just 2.2 percent while the proportion of the population participating in programs that provide old-age contributory pensions, health, and/or social security insurance is only 5.9 percent, which is much lower than the developing economies average of 20.3 percent.

The old-age dependency ratio, i.e., the number of people aged 65 and above, compared to the number of working-age people, which is 8.5 percent, and is expected to rise only marginally to 11.2 percent by 2040, it added.
But even with such low pension coverage in the country, reforms to public pensions have become unavoidable in Pakistan in the face of the worrying acceleration in the associated public sector spending witnessed over the last decade.

This is principal because public pensions are unfunded and thus are burdening the already tight fiscal revenue situation.

Current Pension Structure in Pakistan

In its current form, the pension structure is a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) model. Under which, the government guarantees pensions and other retirement benefits to employees who do not make personal contributions from their salaries.
Another element that seems unique in the public sector pension structure of Pakistan is that alongside the existing pensioners, future retirees (current employees) are also entitled to enjoy the benefits of contemporaneous pension increments announced by the government.


In other words, once an employee retires from civil/public service, she/he will be able to receive all pension benefits accumulated (due to retrospective increases announced in previous years) on the latest drawn salary.
For instance, an employee retiring in FY19 will also receive the increment of 15 percent announced by the government in the year FY12, 7.5 percent in FY16, 10 percent in FY17, 10 percent in FY18, and 10 percent in FY19.

Moreover, it is also important to note that even this retrospective increase in future pension is at the discretion of the government. For instance, in some years like FY08 and FY09, the pension increase was only offered to current pensioners without any adjustments for future retirees, whereas in years FY12, FY16, FY17, FY18, and FY19, the equal increment was offered to current and future pensioners.

Similarly, the government can also discontinue these rates at any time for future retirees. These ad-hoc adjustments in pension increment provide minimum certainty to future retirees, the study reported.
In case of death of an in-service or a retired worker, the eligible family members are authorized to draw pension and allied benefits at the rate of 75 percent of the net pension until marriage or death (more on this later).

The amount of pension is usually determined by the length of completed years of qualifying service of the concerned employee. Once the employee has completed 25 years of service and/or becomes 60 years of age, he/she can receive a pension amount equivalent to 70 percent of the last pay/emoluments drawn, including special pay and other allowances. The incidence of completing 25 years of service before turning 60 is particularly prominent with regards to BPS 1-16 officers as well as employees in the police departments and the armed forces.

In case the qualifying service is greater than ten years, but less than 30 years, the pension is calculated at a prescribed rate according to the length of service.
The pensioner can also avail of the commutation option, according to which, he/she can avail in advance a maximum of 35 percent of gross pension for several years according to the commutation table set by the government.
In Pakistan, however, the government uses an unstructured approach to adjust the yearly pension increments and increases the assigned benefits in an ad-hoc manner.
There are five major factors why pension-related spending in the country is increasing at a worrying pace. These include:
  • ad-hoc and retrospective increments in pensions announced by the government
  • commutation and restoration facilities offered to pensioners
  • early retirements
  • generous survivorship benefits
  • a high replacement rate
Pension System Needs Structured Reforms

The public pension expenditure in Pakistan is on the path of becoming unsustainable. While limited fiscal space is a major reason why increasing pension spending is worrisome, improvements in the pension framework can substantially help make future payments manageable.

Eliminating the generous retrospective increments and reducing the list of dependents eligible for pension payments appear as quick and easy-to-implement measures. The concerned authorities must carry out specialized evaluation exercises at their own end and implement the required legislative reforms accordingly.
Finally, it is important to undertake a periodic review of implemented reforms in order to ensure the long-term sustainability of the pension structure.

Once the features of the current pension structure are successfully streamlined through sufficient parametric restructuring, the next step would be the adoption of comprehensive systemic reform to ensure the fiscal sustainability of pension liabilities in the long-run.

In this process, the current non-contributed, defined-benefit, and pay-as-you-go pension scheme would need to be gradually phased out and replaced with a contributory and funded structure in which the benefits are closely linked with the value of pre-retirement contributions, the study concluded.

++++++++++++++++


3 million out of 220 million population pays tax... we need to increase the revenue..
18% to pensions, then a big chunk for interest payments, then for provinces, then for defense.... what we have actually for the rest of the country left?
Nada tbh... but 3 million out of 220 million population pays tax in first place 🤣
So is military pension more or the governments employee?
Millitary pensions do come under govt employees.. secondly millitary gets its pensions and then pays pensioners from Fauji Foundation and other welfare funds aswell...
 
Back
Top Bottom