What you just said contradicts with western democracy doctrine. I was told 1000 times in past decades that western democracy is way better than China's political system, and China will fall apart like USSR sooner or later.
Base on your theory, you had admitted that China can achieve much bigger progress in human history without western democracy. And you also predicted that China can sustain and will surpass US and even the whole western world combined. What's wrong with western democracy doctrine?
The real thing is not about western democracy at all. It's all about who will be in charge. The people or the plutocrats.
Throughout human history, people are ruled by elites which take bigger share of pie. Monarchy and capitalism are the same on economic term. Western democracy is the cover which give people the illusion that they are in charge, it never was. The western democracy use constitution, rule of law, fixed term election to grab legitimacy. After year by year propaganda, people believe in it, and stop challenging the SYSTEM. The SYSTEM is a machine to drain the wealth and redistribute. Of course, the plutocrats always get bigger share, that's the beauty of capitalism and it's rule of law, who can challenge?
What makes China different and makes West scared is that, the plutocrats are not on the driver seat. That's one of the most important reason why Soviet Union was under attack in 20th century.
If you go back to
French Revolution in 1789, the Revolution overthrew the monarchy, established a republic. Those Monarchies quickly aligned to counter France.
Holy Alliance is base on ideology to defend Monarchy.
History always repeat itself. When China has a more advanced, progressive political system and ideology, those plutocrats can't tolerate. Because China not only challenge their might, but also their legitimacy.
As we all knew, plutocracy can NOT sustain.