10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

[Suriya]

China didn't disclose it's casualty figures in the Galwan clash. This gave Chinese members excuse to claim minor Chinese losses while Pakistan members i guess for very personal reasons were more assured than the Chinese that PLA can't have causalities and even willing to accept zero loss theory.

But i'm going present this CCP mouth piece Globaltimes column written by it's editor Hu Xijin who inadvertently admits Chinese deaths at Galwan and promises to honor them as there was growing sense of disquiet among chinese netizen that Chinese casualties were honored properly.

Here is the excerpt of the article he wrote.

I would like to pay high tribute to the PLA officers and soldiers. China's security and the tranquility of China's borders depend upon them. Thus far, the Chinese military has not released any information about the deceased. As both a former soldier and current media professional, I understand that this is an expedient move with the aim of not irritating public opinion in the two countries, especially in India. This is Beijing's goodwill. I believe that the dead have been treated with the highest respect in the military, and that the information will eventually be reported to society at the right time, so that heroes can be honored and remembered as they deserve.

Link : https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1192622.shtml

 

[crankthatskunk]

China didn't disclose it's casualty figures in the Galwan clash. This gave Chinese members excuse to claim minor Chinese losses while Pakistan members i guess for very personal reasons were more assured than the Chinese that PLA can't have causalities and even willing to accept zero loss theory.

But i'm going present this CCP mouth piece Globaltimes column written by it's editor Hu Xijin who inadvertently admits Chinese deaths at Galwan and promises to honor them as there was growing sense of disquiet among chinese netizen that Chinese casualties were honored properly.

Here is the excerpt of the article he wrote.



Link : https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1192622.shtml

stretching my friend. What he said is this,

"I understand that this is an expedient move with the aim of not irritating public opinion in the two countries, especially in India."

This means two things,

1- The Indians casualties were way too high than what is disclosed by the Indians. Therefore, if the true figures are disclosed the Public opinion in India would be irritated.

2- The Chinese casualties were way too low, may be one or two, therefore, if the true figures are disclosed it would be devastating for Indian Public opinion. Because Indians had lied to their public and disclosed 43 Chinese soldiers dead.

Either way, he has not said that there were huge Chinese casualties. It definitely is worse for India.

 

[Rollno21]

stretching my friend. What he said is this,

"I understand that this is an expedient move with the aim of not irritating public opinion in the two countries, especially in India."

This means two things,

1- The Indians casualties were way too high than what is disclosed by the Indians. Therefore, if the true figures are disclosed the Public opinion in India would be irritated.

2- The Chinese casualties were way too low, may be one or two, therefore, if the true figures are disclosed it would be devastating for Indian Public opinion. Because Indians had lied to their public and disclosed 43 Chinese soldiers dead.

Either way, he has not said that there were huge Chinese casualties. It definitely is worse for India.

Let's take it step by step ,now you agree there are casualties on Chinese side .next step will be number of casualties.

 

[crankthatskunk]

Let's take it step by step ,now you agree there are casualties on Chinese side .next step will be number of casualties.

Where did i accepted it!!

I only analyse what you quoted.

In any case, don't you think India should be producing the evidence of 43 Chinese Dead!!
I know one thing for certain, Indians lied. There is no chance in hell 43 Chinese died.
But then we know, it is an old habit of Indian. I mean lying.
We are still waiting for evidence of 350 deaths in Indian airstrike.

 

[nature is]

GlobalTimes isn't official state media, it's mostly opinion-editorial. CGTN is the official state media.

 

[Feng Leng]

GlobalTimes isn't official state media, it's mostly opinion-editorial. CGTN is the official state media.

That's not true. China suffered at least one dead. This is fact. The rest is India's self-delusion.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

...
In any case, don't you think India should be producing the evidence of 43 Chinese Dead!!...

I think they've already provided a list of names from a WhatsApp message. They were like all Generals.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

They think hiding casualties and deaths can win a skirmish and war. But they don't read the history. China had more than 40 deaths. Only a loser can hide their fallen heroes deaths. Winner don't need to hide.

 

[nature is]

That's not true. China suffered at least one dead. This is fact. The rest is India's self-delusion.

I said GlobalTimes isn't the official state media, that much is true.

As for causalities, there's no official words. Some report says 1 death, some 5 injured.....etc.

 

[crankthatskunk]

I think they've already provided a list of names from a WhatsApp message. They were like all Generals.

Yeah, we know, Indians cannot do anything properly.
Even lying is beyond them.

 

[Rollno21]

Where did i accepted it!!

I only analyse what you quoted.

In any case, don't you think India should be producing the evidence of 43 Chinese Dead!!
I know one thing for certain, Indians lied. There is no chance in hell 43 Chinese died.
But then we know, it is an old habit of Indian. I mean lying.
We are still waiting for evidence of 350 deaths in Indian airstrike.

It's their responsibility to deny our claim and proved the proof ,like India said Pakistan used the regular troops during kargil and Pakistan kept saying they are mujahedeen,we had to bury their dead and 10 years later they accept they are their soldiers .

 

[Feng Leng]

It's their responsibility to deny our claim and proved the proof ,like India said Pakistan used the regular troops during kargil and Pakistan kept saying they are mujahedeen,we had to bury their dead and 10 years later they accept they are their soldiers .

We occupy your territory and captured your commanders. We don't need to deny your self-delusion. You can apply burnol on your burning azz

 

[newb3e]

They think hiding casualties and deaths can win a skirmish and war. But they don't read the history. China had more than 40 deaths. Only a loser can hide their fallen heroes deaths. Winner don't need to hide.

and why does it matter? they have taken over your land even if they lost thousands they control your lands!

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

and why does it matter? they have taken over your land even if they lost thousands they control your lands!

Which land? Why Pakistanis don't read?
Evidence? Do you even know the matter between India and China?
PDF is filled with fan boys and uneducated people. Can't help..

 

[Feng Leng]

Which land? Why Pakistanis don't read?
Evidence? Do you even know the matter between India and China?
PDF is filled with fan boys and uneducated people. Can't help..

https://twitter.com/x/status/1285879031498342400