What's new

10 Areas In Which India Beats Even The Most Powerful Countries In The World

Status
Not open for further replies.
Germany was forged together by Bismark like India was forged together by the British. But Germany is equivalent to an Indian state.Does Maratha empire believe they are India, how about Sihk empires or Mysore rulers? They believe they were rulers of their own empires, not India.

If Tamil Nadu were its own kingdom, it can claim Chola empire. But not India as its a British creation.

Indian states were bonded very close with the cultural and religious ties. A Sikh Empire was in Modern pakistan, but several of its religious places exists in Maharastra like in Nasik. Ever heard of Sufism, a maratha could serve under Sikh emperor. Sikh empire, or the Maratha empire are the geographical location of the kings whom they rule but does not confined people across the whole country. Language wise all languages are derived from Sanskrit. Religious wise Sikh is just a sect of Hindu. Unity in Diversity was the Mantra and still the Mantra.

We faces many attacks and forieghn rule but we are still standing tall with our Rich cultural heritage. which we can feel proud of.

The friendly environment is being created for Nobelprize seeker Modi to visit Pakistan where non state actors are dime a dozen.

Word to the wise should suffice as the adage goes.

Nothing is going to happen. Its a distant Dream, hope it didn't turn out to be another Kargil
 
India taught you fabricated history. Just because Roman Empire existed doesn't means that Italy is 3000 years old. Just because there were a Mauyan empire doesn't mean that they stand for India. Does the Mughal emperors believe they were a continuation of Ashoka or Timur?
Columbus tried to reach India or Pakistan ?
East India Company ...existed before 1947 but India did not ?
 
India taught you fabricated history. Just because Roman Empire existed doesn't means that Italy is 3000 years old. Just because there were a Mauyan empire doesn't mean that they stand for India. Does the Mughal emperors believe they were a continuation of Ashoka or Timur?

I don't know about the others but mughals (babur) was and did believe it was a continuation of Timur.
 
No. 4 and No.9 are essentially Junk!
 
Because the Modern India still bore the Mauryan syboll of chakra in its flag and the four face lion symbol in its official logo

emblem.jpg
df4300b91734f6e9362be7e14a5373d3760258aa.jpg


In the end Satyamev Jayate is written Means Truth is God

06d13a3b61041ce3c0c8a4a55173c00144ef1d37.jpg
Indian-Army-logo.jpg

India can use any ancient symbol it wants. But this empire ceased to existed long time ago. And this empire is not like ancient Israel, which is a people and a nation. People of India today identify with the empire it belonged to, not the concept of India. The Slavic or Germanic people are more of a "nation" than even Indians.
 
i guess countries like Sri Lanka too has significant presence of Women in public domain, holding key posts and influence in society.
@Gibbs you can tell more about it.

Not sure about the numbers really.. As for Education i think percentage of Woman is quite high to equal including tertiary level

why-sri-lanka-the-statistics-11-638.jpg


causes-and-effects-of-dropouts-at-primary-level-22-638.jpg


@Godman @HeinzG .. Any specific stats on this
 
Last edited:
Columbus tried to reach India or Pakistan ?
East India Company ...existed before 1947 but India did not ?

Columbus tried to reach India as a geographical location. Just like Europe or Arabia is a geographical expression.

I don't know about the others but mughals (babur) was and did believe it was a continuation of Timur.


Yes. India was a land, a geographical expression. India need to teach it's kids that British created India and that all those empires and kingdom existed earlier were not related to India. And finally, admit that Churchill was correct that India was a geographical expression.
 
India can use any ancient symbol it wants. But this empire ceased to existed long time ago. And this empire is not like ancient Israel, which is a people and a nation. People of India today identify with the empire it belonged to, not the concept of India. The Slavic or Germanic people are more of a "nation" than even Indians.
Who told you all this. This British/western propaganda. The people of the old time have the same culture, ancesity, heritage what we have today. With time many other people came, and bring new ideas, culture, but didn't replaced it but gets merged within it. So actually the society keep growing and becoming rich e..g with time new Sect like Budhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Radha Swami got created, it does not means the people gets devided but new ideas, better thoughts keep on emerging. than the Sufism also got popular. New languages got created like Hindi, Urdu.

Actually there is a phrase in Hindi Kos Kos par badle Paani, chaar kos par Paani means aver every one km the water changes, and after every four km Dialect. So if you can see how many dialect are in India its more than 100s and official language close to 20, it does not means people cannot talk to each other. Infact many dialect are very cloose to each other like Punjaabi, himachali and doogri

Yes. India was a land, a geographical expression. India need to teach it's kids that British created India and that all those empires and kingdom existed earlier were not related to India. And finally, admit that Churchill was correct that India was a geographical expression.
Correct yourself its not the land that makes the country, rather the people that makes the country.
 
Indian states were bonded very close with the cultural and religious ties. A Sikh Empire was in Modern pakistan, but several of its religious places exists in Maharastra like in Nasik. Ever heard of Sufism, a maratha could serve under Sikh emperor. Sikh empire, or the Maratha empire are the geographical location of the kings whom they rule but does not confined people across the whole country. Language wise all languages are derived from Sanskrit. Religious wise Sikh is just a sect of Hindu. Unity in Diversity was the Mantra and still the Mantra.

We faces many attacks and forieghn rule but we are still standing tall with our Rich cultural heritage. which we can feel proud of.



Nothing is going to happen. Its a distant Dream, hope it didn't turn out to be another Kargil

There were many empire in today's India. But the biggest is that the founding fathers of India hijacked the term India and use it incorrectly. That is the source of all the confusion.
 
There were many empire in today's India. But the biggest is that the founding fathers of India hijacked the term India and use it incorrectly. That is the source of all the confusion.
Where are you from ? First the Name India was the western Name derieved from river Indus

Second For Arabs it was Hindustan -- Land below Hindu Kush or the Land of Hindus

Third for Indians the name is Bharata --- Mentioned check a old book named Mahabharata -- Maha + Bharata which is 3000 BC old.

Fourth Greek History mentioned India in their books.
 
There were many empire in today's India. But the biggest is that the founding fathers of India hijacked the term India and use it incorrectly. That is the source of all the confusion.

India uses the same logic that PRC uses to emphasize its territorial claims. The logic being old maps. It was not Britain that united India. The credit goes to Sardar Vallabbhai Patel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom