Search results

do you pay tax for an apple, a chair or many other things after you brought and owned it?"common way to raise money to operate the govt"? maybe common in your country, not mine. At least in China, we don't pay tax for keeping what belongs to us, not even a house. maybe I mdke a mistake here...

US gov maybe is bankrucpted, but Wall Street if flooded with money. However, if you want to persuade them to invest something else, like infrastructure, forget it!

the best thief never get caught, which means they are not good enough.

on topic. 1) money. China's gov controls all the state-owned companies, so money is never a problem. 2) land. 3) willingness and vision. the chinese gov has to spend the money anyway, so they choose to invest in infrastructure to boost the economic. 4) decission making process. no...

In China, the gov owns all the land, so every has to pay and lease the land. In US, you are the "owner" of the land, but 1) you have pay tax for it (does "owner" need to pay tax for something they really really own?) 2) you can not sell it to another countries' citizenes (so the "owners"...

can help to give you a thank, I love the image.

don't link corruption and CCP together. every country is confronting with such a problem, even the so-called democracy countries, China is not alone. guess what, only two countries through out the human history have successfully rooted out corruption: one was USSR and the other one was China...

the globe demand of commercial jets in the next 20 years is expected to reach $250-600 bn, so if anyone think that building them is not profitable, think again. And guess how much China has invested in developing C919, RMB 10-20 bn only. Moreover, it can create more than 10,000 hi-tech job...

maybe they have no say on what goes in Afghan, but US have NO say on what goes TO Afghan neither: From those you want, such as supply to those you don' t want, such as weapons.:woot:

uncle sam must be very very unhappy about this

1)you can make claims, but it would be better if you could support them with credible source at the same time; otherwse, it is nothing. 2) can it? I don't know. you have any source or idea? 3) I am also interested in it, may I know what are they?

you can keep believeing what you believe, what I try to point out are: 1) you source is not credible; 2) it is not possible, even theoretically.

sorry, re-posting something posted by GodlessBastard which is from The Hindu will not satisfied me. unless you can answer my questions above. that is, what: radars, ECM, engines etc how: produce whith what and you don't need to be an expert to conclude that "100 percent indigenisation"...

I hope can provide a more credible source rather than from wiki which was again auoted from "bharat-rakshak".

to find something the doesn't exist is of course "hard to find". And all I know is countries like Germany, Japan and Israel that do not have them right now, so they import engines; countries like US, Russia and Frence have that kind of equipment so they export engines. and don't just focus...

oh sorry, Israeli ECM. Russian radar.

why is so difficult for you to understand. without the hydraulic forging press, all you can do is to assemble, not produce. so if you want to convince me that you are actually "producing" them, please convince me that you have the capability to do that. Building and manufacturing an engine is...

my point is do you have the equipment to build them?

here is a section quoted from you source. can you identify some problems here? what about some critical component: CPUs and other hardwares. what about the source codes inside? or maybe we could go to a higher level. MKI use: engines from Russia, radars from Israel, Fire control system...

to some extent, it matters. today in US, those who advocasting "good Sino-US relationships" are those who earning money from China; while the hawks are those who can earn money from fighting China. This is what politic is indeed. so if some chinese politician can be benefited from GM's...