^^^ Hence proven; this guy in HongWu (TentWu) or Martian2. :laugh:
Chinese bra-less girls are best for giving exams... :tup:
Cadmiurm rice is the key nutrient which "nourishes" commie brains. :laugh:
Even sub-saharan haven't upgraded to the level of cadminum for meeting "nutrition" needs...
Are you HongWu aka TentWu's alternate username?
Looking at the quality of chinese tents, they s*ck at both military and education... at both, china compares to sub-saharan africa.
And with no more food, either, china just has coal to mine .... keep digging .. digging .. digging. :laugh:
China has gone even further .... they have "tents". :laugh:
Perhaps, US feels its utter waste of money to get sophisticated weapons ... when "tents" can be rolled back by just tweaking china's ear, like India did.
No need for weapons.. Obama will tweak Xi Jingping ears, and he'll rollback his...
I think Antony has done a good job. :tup:
In general, India's defence preparedness is much better now than a decade back.
Further, continuity has its own advantages. :tup:
Good job: MM singh, Chidambaram and Antony. :tup:
There is no treaty bound "obligation", if that's what you mean by promise.
But increasing capabilities will be developed to keep the sea lanes to Japan and Korea, via SCS, open, when necessary by force.
Support means that there would be more frequent naval deployments to SCS; naval exercises...
Civilisations must develop a certain level of maturity to have a high level of cultural and literary achievements.
Ramayana talks about air travel; and its no co-incidence that Oppeheimer instantly recalled what Bhagwat Gita said, when he saw the first atomic explosion.
One needs a certain...
Yes, but more with chinese money now. (Su-35, which India declined; 2 AIP submarines).
We're making our Su-30MKIs completely in India, including the AL-31 engines.
China doesn't have an option .... its Russia which sets the procurement terms for china, since all other don't deal with china.
It's about time you changed your name from HongWu to TentWu.
PRC is all ready to invade the world with a "tent".
You must be upset, Japan didn't set up a "tent" in Nanking. Too bad for you. :laugh:
Arrey yaar.. aisa mat bolo.. tumhare "all weather friend" ka dil toot jayega.
They are bra-less ... but look at them as your sisters, not wh0res ... and mind you.. don't be behen-ch*d.
So, where is the "tent" now ?
And where is the "mega moga shoga armoured thrust to new delhi".... all fizzled out; and India didn't need to mobilize a single soldier.
PRC has a "tent" but makes its foolish subjects believe it's an aircraft carrier.
And c'mon what is even more humiliating is...
Come.. and we'll get an excuse to beat the $hit out of china so horribly, that japanese plunder of 1937-45 will look a minor thing to you.
Guts of a "tent" .. and megafarts of "hongwu" ... that's what PRC stands for.
So, you clearly imply, that faithfulguy has no credibility.
We'll leave faithfulguy (whose "faith" just got a severe jolt at your hands), to sort out with you.
Let us know, if faith remains intact or the con-world. :laugh:
Really. :laugh:
Next, you'll say China spanked Japan between 1937-45. :laugh:
China was stripped naked in DBO and paraded back nude, in full global view.
And all that HongWu could do is to post his "heavy armoured brigage photographs" on a lousy defence forum !!!
After all Sun Tzu...
Still good enough ... only USA and Russia have proven MIRV capability.
I'm not saying we shouldn't test it, but testing MIRV will need to be "managed" internationally.
There could be much greater "noise" than test of Agni-V itself, if India were to test MIRV too soon.
Perhaps, govt...
Why not? - we got china to roll back its tent without mobilising one soldier.
Strength lies in a heavy capability, so powerful that you never need to use it.
We didn't mobilise a single soldier, but china got a plain message that the tent has to go.
This wouldn't have been the case, if the we...