"You'' represents Pakistan army, and when he's talking about govt turning blind eye, he's talking about support given by the army to those militants. The question put was straight forward but the answers in twisted form. Sure Musharraf has learned few tricks. He never said No. He could have...
You are taking an issue of micro level to a macro. You think if that guy had stepped out of his car he would be praised by those kids. They'd had killed him or seriously injured him.
The boy seriously didn't care for his life, and obviously he didn't care for the drivers too.
India to build cyber attack proof operating system
Bangalore, Oct 9 (IANS) The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is developing a futuristic operating system to protect its sensitive data from cyber attacks, including hacking, a top official said Saturday.
'We initiated...
Pakistan should rather think of saving Baluchistan from Taliban rather than saving Kashmir. It might end up loosing both. Pakistan is just stretching the rubber.
It was a matter of winning hearts in that state, but such kind of statements must be avoided. He now has given more fodder to the separatists. But it never changes India's stand on Kashmir, he never was a good politician.
The strategy of Chinese in GB will tilt things to their favor cause they very well know the Indian navy threat in the Indian ocean. They won't be depending on just seas. Maybe in future they may built Oil/gas pipeline in that region. India has to ensure no Chinese involvement in P.O.K which it...
Keep your personal remarks to yourself. If you keep arguing about WMDs then there's no point talking to you cause you simply don't wanna get it. Whats logical here is to wait and watch, its easy for you to conclude that anyone arguing Pakistan state sponsored terrorism is a blatant lie and fools.
And its always Pak who pleads US to mediate the Kashmir issue only to be shown the middle fingers, and you talk about who the **** cares. Its not something only US have been telling. You might remember UK primes visit to India.
Its not about 'might' and 'are', its the third time in this past week that fingers are being raised at Pakistan's state organization and army supporting act of terrorism. Its not India, this time its former head of the state and Pakistan's neutral ally.
David Coleman Hadley, US citizen. Why doesn't US shows some bone and hand him over to India for interrogation. Why only in front of FBI.
On other note, why doesn't India have a cup of Tea with Musharraf to know each other well:azn:
I don't blame Pakistani's for calling names to Indian leaders, cause they don't respect their own leaders (rightfully so). The only respectable 1 might be Jinnah. Other than that dictators and beggars. I bet Pakistani's would have loved Indira if she was their leader.
For Superiority, every one liked to be looked upto. 'Power', thats what humans like and want.
Its Greed to have more which can't be satisfied leads to aggression towards others.
Its a behavior not only in humans but animals as well, fighting for territories.
Perhaps Darwin's theory of...
I think the next attempt would be from China, probably by 2025. They already have the experience of sending man in space. Surely they intend to go one step further to moon.
I think international space agencies can collaborate to invest in a space voyager, so that exploration can be done more...
Withdrawal of forces can only happen provided right environment. Pakistan is backing insurgency to disrupt peace in the valley and you think Indian troops are gonna sit and watch. Man if you people want to liberate Kashmir, come with your armed forces, we don't mind. But don't play this dirty game.