Search results

Oh, rly? If you do not stop your trolling and patronising bullshit immediately, I will show the guys here the real face of China. Things like this: By bangalorean at 2010-08-08 There is much more, and much worse where that came from. Keep that in mind before proceeding.

And you said exactly what the Chinese troll wanted you to say. You warmed the cockles of his trollish heart. India has a lot to improve upon, but in cases like worker rights and sheer brutality, India has nothing to learn from China. Yes, we can learn a thing or two about infrastructure and...

Why does the thread starter 'TechLahore' not understand that this case was not about punishing the Mosque demolishers? There is a separate case ongoing in that regard. This case was about establishing the land title, and the court has given an impartial and fair judgement!

Sure, they should have prevented the mob from getting near enough the Mosque to demolish it. That was a black mark. But really, even though India might not have a stellar record on this front, it is much much better than most nations. Given the dynamics and nature of the Indian population...

Oh come on. One Mosque was was demolished two decades back by a group of fanatics, and I completely disagree with their action. The fact that the issue has been disputed for more than 60 years, and a court has delivered an impartial verdict speaks volumes about India's secular credentials. In a...

Again this nonsense comparison of minority oppression? Really? Buddhism totally wiped out in Pakistan: Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan Christian harrassed for "blashpemy charges": Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan Forced conversions in Pakistan...

This is malicious and an attempt to defraud readers by trying to present your own views as the BBCs. Edit your post and clearly demarcate your own views, separate from the BBCs.

Consider for a moment - you got so offended when that poster whom you replied to you even suggested such a thing. Then, why the discrimination against Ayodhya, which is considered among the most sacred places for Hindus? I myself am not bothered whether a Temple comes up there or a Mosque. I...

In a country where Hindus form a huge majority, a dispute kept going on and on for 63 years, a court case went on for 17 years, on whether or not a temple should exist in one of Hinduism's most sacred locations. If this is not secularism, I don't know what is. See, if India was indeed as...

Well, times were different around 600 years back. We weren't a powerful army with nuclear weapons back then, and it is too simplistic to ask, "why was it not kept safe". If a certain invader/ruler/king (whatever you call him) defeats your army decisively, it is rather tough to 'keep it safe', as...

Replace all the minority names with Muslims/Christians, replace Pakistan with India, and I can do a search-replace and type the same post back. Where will I stop if I start naming all the successful Muslims in Indian society? And I mean, really, hugely successful. The point is, there is no...

Yahbut - I posted several links on persecution of minorities in Pakistan too, and all of them were from either Pakistani or neutral sources. Whatever its flaws, India protects its minorities better than Pakistan does. Far be it from me to derail threads by posting unrelated stuff, but it was...

Really? That's all you can come up with? Did you read the judgement, do you even know what the judgement is? Or did you just suddenly notice this thread and think, "Hey, those Hindus must have finished giving their biased judgement by now", and then rushed to type your comment? That's what it...

Ayodhya had "special status", and there is no way this is going to snowball into anything like challenging other structures. This dispute is not just from 1992, there are records of violence over this structure as farback as during the British rule in 1800s - it does have separate significance...

No more Masjids will be demolished. This was considered holy land by many Hindus, hence the huge issue. The Indian judiciary is not such that we can "make it come up with a verdict" . Statements like this, and linking the judge's religion to the judgement, etc. are making Pakistan look bad, more...

Agree with you, you are right. The judgement summary has been posted above by some posters including me. This is indeed the most equitable solution.

Really? Buddhism totally wiped out in Pakistan: Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan Christian harrassed for "blashpemy charges": Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan Forced conversions in Pakistan: http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=199286...

Based on your posts about this topic, it does not seem that you understand what happened today. You are not able to read a simple summary of a court judgement and understand it. You are again and again typing lies about the judgement. By the way, you also need to go further back to understand...

No, the temple existed, was destroyed, mosque was built, Hindus and Muslims used to pray there together till around 300 years back, and then mosque was destroyed by fanatics in 1992. And the court says, both parties have a right due to the above circumstances. Why are you twisting the truth...

Terrible example. Kindly do read the judgement summaries posted above. The court did establish that this land was being frequented by Hindus even before (and during) the Mosque's existance. So, the claim of the other party to the title is legitimate. Your Mahalakshmi temple example, however...