You are comparing a tactical battle field wepon with a strategic deterrent.. As per your doctrine ,your tactical warhead needs a low yield nuke ranging from single digits to tens of KT.. Miniaturization of high yield strategic thermonuclear nuke with 100-250 KT is not as easy as developing a low...
One of the major problem faced by Chinese economy is its Over capacity.. Cutting this overcapacity is the first step of Supply side reforms.. Now China doing is nothing more than creating demand by lending money..
For example China produces 10 ton steel.. Actual demand is only 8 ton steel.. How...
Good for Pakistan.. Will make a public feeling that any kind of terrorism (good ya bad) is despicable.. This is the ultimate solution for Pakistan's security problems.. Otherwise anyone can exploit people in the name of jihad..
Even TTP is good terrorists for someone, bad terrorists for...
China Loves Pakistan … but Most Chinese Don’t
China's pro-Pakistan state media blitz may be more about convincing its own people.
Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s first state visit to Pakistan, and the $46 billion infrastructure and energy deal announced between the...
In September 2010 India’s newly constituted tri-services Strategic Forces Command (SFC) submitted a proposal to the Defence Ministry for setting up two dedicated squadrons of aircraft comprising 40 Su-30MKI air dominance fighters. The task of this “mini air force” is to deliver nuclear weapons...
Su-30 flies with BrahMos missile for first time
Integration of BrahMos with Su-30 MKI gives the weapon multi-platform capability, making the IAF the only Air Force in the world in procession of a supersonic cruise missile system
India’s Brahmos supersonic cruise missiles. (Source: Reuters)
In a...
Our new strategy to distract Pakistan from its real problem.. When we point Pakistan's vulnerabilities, you people will ignore it without thinking..:cheesy::cheesy:
Let us discuss the results..(according to your post)
1. Pakistan divided to two halves or Pakistan lost half of its territory..
2. India lost 1/3 of Kashmir.. That is Pakistan occupied part of Kashmir..
No need of your education man.. We are also saying the same things.. That is why we are...
Obviously Pak nukes helped subcontinent from some serious clashes between India &Pakistan.. Especially in 1999,2001&2008.. But silly terrorist attacks like Parliament attack, Mumbai, Uri etc seriously damaged the value of your deterrent..
If there is no difference between these, Pakistan's support of LeT and JuD cause next war.. Because Western Pakistan attacked India for our support of Mukti Bahini, so we have every right to attack Pakistan because of their support to LeT & JuD (according to your logic)..
NASR is a Tactical nuclear wepon.. How can you compare a low-yield battlefield weapons with strategic nuclear deterrent?? Here you need high yield thermonuclear miniaturized payloads..
India have no such capability to track missile tests by other countries with such precision..
For acquiring MIRV tech, you have to master many sophisticated technologies from boosters to radars, seekers and sophisticated mission control centers..Also cutting edge techs like weapon dispersion...
Whether Pakistan has mastered MIRV technology given that it merely mentions that the missile is “capable” of being fitted with a MIRV warhead, rather than announcing that it has mastered the technology and developed MIRV payload (Miniaturized nuclear warheads for MIRVs).