Search results

Have you seen anyone to know will be severely suppressed, but she, a mother with her children still, it Will never happen, only when they know that they are safe ,this is just a show and then bring their children to start performing, the Western media, you do a nice job. Western reporters to...

Close look at those pictures, you will find something Who shot it? It is a good point, tell you the truth, all photos are taken by the Western media, you see, some people even have been set a position to show. In first week, China's open to Western correspondents, they enter Urumqi, then ...

Do you think I was afraid that when the war is really coming? I will apply, if war occurs, so the final still might is right? Rest assured, the most worried about who will not is China. ---------- Post added at 06:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:09 PM ---------- Every generation...

international arbitration? you believe it? a Security Council resolution for the no-fly zone, into a bombing pass, you believe there is any fairness and justice in the so-called international arbitration? you daydream? In fact, most of the territorial dispute must not have any international...

You serious? Ok, leaving aside how ridiculous your logic, so to speak, China's management has continued to this day from the Tang, so your argument can into the trash.

You see, GAMIT, in fact, your logic is that might is right, I said that if Vietnam is to this logic, I can agree ,but you can determine the Vietnam hope so? Also, I do not care how narrow you in the end, but so to speak, failed and successful period of time, it will not be missing in China's...

If you say "vague", to a certain extent, I agree, it is not clear enough as modern, but, I think, to the ancient standard for an area of sovereignty, it is sufficient, first it has a clear statement of a region, the second, there are some islands name, though not all the islands, and, the Qing...

You really need the truth? I do not think you need it as some other Indians.

I ask you, GAMIT, if a book to record territory of the Tang Dynasty in the chinese government and the royal family records, the South China Sea is clear and unambiguous records in it, what do you think it is?

You mean, Vietnamese troops occupied it , so it was Vietnamese, this is your logic, I say, no problem, this logic, we can use it, do not complain about that time, because this is your logic . Not only in ancient times, ancient but that we have enough qualified than others, the South China Sea...

I said, as the house owner, I have a lot of houses, some of the house is remote, so it is empty, but I have a record of the sovereignty of the house in a formal document, it is better evidence, the army has never been evidence that at least you can not put it as the only evidence.The sovereignty...

I can not look at that map, any connection?

It was "discovered" that there is no claim to sovereignty. The South China Sea is completely different, because the Chinese Tang dynasty, there is a formal record of the sovereign, not "discovered" that if you want to compare the "discovery", HAN has found recorded in the South China Sea, but...

1838? You think it is more ancient evidence than china, you said, the Vietnamese sent troops earlier than YUAN, give me this evidence.

Oh? Give me a clear Vietnamese official records in that era, otherwise it only shows you steal something when the owners do not pay attention. Only when there is an official record of the Vietnamese Government in the official documents, as a sovereign state, the Ming Dynasty government has no...

Well, if there are enemies, it may need a navy to those islands, but the ancient Chinese have any enemies in those islands? Some time to other Southeast Asian countries even do not have enough sailing skills. Dispatching Navy to defense who in the South China Sea? Only the Yuan Dynasty and Qing...

Such as the Yuan Dynasty navy, so it belongs to China

Sometimes, I feel admiration for the Indians of ignorance you even say so, of course, if you know the truth, I admire you even more for your face.

Very funny, you get a new property, to give up you all the other property, just because it comes from different times? Property ownership is not the case. Prove your ownership of property, if they can prove you have enough qualifications to get it, if it has a dispute, you need to prove you...

Any surprise there? Even from ancient China, a large number of non-yellow people living in China, even living in China's core areas, such as Jews.