Search results

China is rich. They can do what the second largest economy can do. That being said, India has a exclusive relationship with Russia that China does not have with anyone. The Russians may need Chinese money, but they are not found of the CCP buying too many assets in Russia. A lot of Russian...

hmm, worth my time to read this? I think not. dont waste my time with 1 liners. exp insults.

You really think Indians are building Agni missiles, supersonic and hypersonic missiles because of Pakistan? There is nothing to counter.

This not news. its a spin. India has huge influence on nepal despite the rhetoric its largely good. no fence, no border. nepals relationship with india is on different level. besides, who wants to China`s (CCP`s) best friend...

Their Govt. are largely in favor of India despite scapegoating. The Indians have disputes outside diplomatic. As far as SAARC is concerned, Pakistan is the black sheep. Hopefully pressure from the civilian govt. and washingtons backing have already made a change in FO in Pakistan. Although...

SA sould not be on the list. Crude oil is its only worth. No people or actual power. And oil is loosing value as alternatives arrive.

umm Pakistan? was 25% non muslim. No 99% muslim. Don't tell me all those non muslims didn't exist.

I don't know about that. The HQ-9 and FD-2000 are Ukrainian (exSoviet) designs. Despite this as interim solution China still purchased the S-300 system. The System on offer to India has Isreali radar and newer hit to kill Russian missiles for the S-500 missile family. IE India will get S-500...

Wow, your poorly informed. What does you name mean any ways? So you think India couldn't modernize with out Britian? For the 200 years, Britian ruled India, India WAS SH!TE POOR! now in the last 50 years, India's a supapower! With poor people who are better. 200 years of british rule-massacre...

India can live with that. You have British people living their, fine. If its empty or colonized, be it whatever, if its used to place B-52's and B-2s than thats an issue. I don't see Britian fielding that stuff and being a threat since it is no longer GREAT BRITAIN just britain with quent...

Sounds absurd for European Island Nation to have territory in the "Indian" Ocean and stuff like this is why OBL justified attacks on 9/11. I think British or UN base may be alright as long as the Americans leave. For a country like India, with Nehrus vision on multi polar world, a big power...

They are also idiots. Many reasons NOT to build a skyscraper(s) over delicate sites and the did it. Its not only a security issue but a natural hazard. As I said before, Fuk the Saudis.

Explain the cost?

Actually Indian politicians fluent that Gandhi mantra and pursue it as well with Nehruvian twist. As for the military, and certain politicians have a more realistic approach. India is following the exact same doctrine(s) as the United States but with out a specific enemy. Monroe doctrine...

Agresive patroling by the PLAN. The PLA has problems with internal showboating over taking reason. Sometimes escalating situations. Ontop of the this the top PLA CCP high ranks are alienated from PLA middle ranks and yet the PLA is a private army. Their (PLA) top generals are CCP memebers...

Russians have to step up on the delivery of the engines. Airframe is not an issue, its very good. Engines are the trouble. They need to allow it to atleast fly at near same ceiling as the Raptor. Only the Mig-31 has comparable flight performance. You got a better idea for heavy combat...

The aquisition process is actually very good. They generally drawo out the best weapon. End of it comics down to politics sinc EVERY govt. in India has had issues with BIG ticket purchases. However, all these deals generally have a very thought out strategic element. The Su-30MKI assembly in...

So whats the service of the Malasyian and Chinese Flankers? Last I heard the Malaysians didn't even have the ground equipment.

INS Vishal is just the beginning. The IN may decide they need even bigger. Which is logical.

Yea, your making a small difference. Both aircraft were designed to do the same role. Go through its, history and you'll see the BAE footprint. You should really try not spin my worlds out of context when proving a point. Cm-400 on JF-17 exp with 2 missiles or 4 tons. Heck, thats not a lot...