Search results

Most historical? I don't think so.

:rolleyes: Please. Had you even heard that term before Vinod here mentioned it? I certainly haven't.

Its the only reason. The "sin" stuff was made up to scare muslims into obeying. Its the same for all religions btw. Erm, that's precisly why its in the quran.

Theological justifications aside, the real reason why muslims are not allowed to marry non-muslims are purely political. This rule, along with the "death for apostasy" and other assorted edicts, are simply to ensure that the number of muslims keeps increasing and does not decrease.

Thanks fatman17 :D No, its not me ;)

Kidnappers release video of UN official By Saleem Shahid QUETTA, Feb 13: The Baloch Liberation United Front (BLUF), which has claimed the kidnapping on Feb 2 of a top UN official in Quetta, released his videotape on Friday. A man calling from an unknown location told the reporter of a...

You guys flatter yourselves.

Interesting history, but rather subversive conclusions.

Well yeah, some Indians were also involved in indentifying the targets, providing logistic support etc. I think that has been clear from the outset.

Wth? Do you have to pass snarky comments about Hindus every second post? I'd like to quote a previous post of yours at this point: Please replace Islam with Hinduism.

Sri Kotravaleeswarar Temple, Karaikudi, TN

Traditional Temples in Himachal Pradesh

I think you mean conspiracy theorists who think they are exposing the truth, and then wondering why nobody takes them seriously.

Justice Taliban style... Suspected Taliban kill two women in Pakistan Suspected Taliban militants shot dead two women and dumped their burqa-clad bodies by a roadside in a northwest Pakistan town, officials said Friday. It was not immediately clear who killed the women in the town of...

I think its photoshop. No shadow has such a weird shape.

Wow. The godless commies are paving the way to Mecca. You just can't make this stuff up can you?

Comeon. If anything, you should be going after Roadrunner. This is unfair.

Well, since we are comparing ethnic groups, I'm assuming that we'll be comparing them on the terms of looks. Is there any other way to do that? What does clothes and food have to do with it? (btw, by language I meant "culture" - my mistake)

Where did you get this? I don't know about Punjab/Haryana , but in Himachal Pradesh, non-Himachalis are not allowed to buy property.

Sindhis and Gujaratis are pretty much alike, apart from language. Erm, grandfather and native-village references don't really cut it. And, if you haven't heard of Haryana then that's your fault. Also, I'm not buying the percentage argument either, but then, what exactly are we arguing...