Search results

I consider Japan a very friendly brother nation. The only problem is a SMALL handful of politicians who betray their own Asian blood, and sell themselves to the White man. Contrary to false beliefs, India has very little bearing on Asia. India's general cultural influence is about the same...

Often these "common people" drag their sorry arses into other people personal affairs. :)

Terrible. What incident was this one? :eek:

Not many registered members (many lurkers though). But there are quite a handful of "Chinese" members who share the similar Indian logic.:azn::cheesy::sniper:

If we don't base on claims on what people SAY and DO, then what do we base them on??? :) Simple FACT: Zangnan which is part of TIBET, which is part of CHINA was ILLEGAL "ANNEXED" BY BRITAIN. The "McMahon Line" is an artificial line drawn by some white european, it bears NO semblence to...

Before you accuse someone of being an idiot, perhaps you should look through this VERY FORUM, where INDIAN MEMBERS have on numerous occassions CLAIMED TIBET (on dubious grounds, particularly "religion"). You don't need to go to BRF. When confronted they lie and weazel their way out. :woot:

Correction: BRIC did the snubbing. :)

I agree. :tup: If India wants the transit, it must prove in actions that it will not use it to harm Pakistan. In life you cannot expect to get something for nothing. If you want somebody to give you something you want, you in return must give them something of value they want.

The New Millennium By Henry C. K. Liu The year 2000 marks two chronological events in the Western Calendar: a new millennium and a new century. Its celebration marks the global dominance of Western culture in the 20th century. The millennium is merely year 4398 in Chinese lunar...

I think we all missed the crucial fact: -- India needs to borrow to finance its military. In other words, they are tight on finances (aka money problems). What does this mean? It means they don't have the luxury or leverage.

Yes, it meant Malvinas.

Interesting analysis. Let's see if it turns out to be true.

To me it is more practical to go directly to Pakistan, and from there to India. If it costs you more than what you can recover, then it doesn't matter how "big" the "market" is. :azn:

This must be ISI propaganda!!! :angel:

It's common sense. If it is CONSTRUCTIVE POSITIVE criticism there is no problem -- in fact it is encouraged. The problem arrives when foreigners attempt to MALIGN, SABOTAGE, and INFLICT DAMAGE on the people -- just like what International Terrorists do.

I personally think the line going west should go directly to Islamabad. Why does the train must pass through India to reach Pakistan???:pakistan: Also, it would be good if it can go to Cairo and down to Africa in the distant future.

Fair enough. Judging from the recent protests and history of resistance, the Sikhs appear more inclined towards Pakistan than India -- but overall they seem to want INDEPENDENCE FROM BOTH nations, aka Khalistan. Do I think Khalistan will succeed within the next 5 years? No, because any...

No wonder the Taliban are winning. :) I kid, I kid.

Don't be so hard on him.... all traitors have a tough time. Subconsciously he knows he betrayed his own people, even killed (or help kill) his own people. That is why he acts out like this. It is similar to how Indians are arrogant - they are over-compensating for their Inferiority Complex...

A lot has been talked about the New Silk Road, aka Asia's Super-Trains. But how many has seen the proposed tracks?