Search results

lol you should see how many of your own countrymen have taken this article seriously. :lol:

It does, for a change. Pakistani national assembly has passed a resolution saying a majority of those killed in drone strikes are innocent civilians. Popular Pakistani politician Imran Khan regularly claims that drones mostly kill civilians. He has even held a very successful dharna on the...

I'm not an expert on this but I hope this implies that there are some loopholes that we can exploit. The Kashmiris badly need electricity and development, something that Pakistan is not willing to let them have.

You would have reached 5000 by now had you worried so much about your own posts. ;)

So Pakistan is an elephant and India is grass which will get trampled? Social throes of legalized marijuana. :disagree:

Krishna is still waiting for the voice samples of the accused to be sent to him as was promised by your govt. Pakistan is deliberately not letting the investigations conclude.

Bharat did provide the proof at the UN and got a few Pakistani organizations and individuals banned. Now please don't say they were not Pakistanis.

There's no post by either you or any other poster that shows (gives a link i.e.) a Pakistani official claiming that 95-97% of those killed in drone strikes have been terrorists. Please stop lying.

Are you seriously thinking of using Made in USA F-16's against the USA in case of any hostilities?

Please ask Ahmed Qureshi yourself. ---------- I'm sure there must be a Zaid Hamid somewhere in there too. :lol:

1. Who's the author of this article? Is he a guest author or a correspondent of the newspaper? I'm sure no rational person can accord any value to a piece of text by an anonymous author. 2. Does the newspaper endorse the author's views? Every newspaper takes a position...

According to latest media reports, the proof was presented to Shuja Pasha when he and Mike Mullen met in the US recently. I hope you do not log in on PDF or internet in general looking to get 'proof' of stuff that intelligence agencies partake in. If you do, nobody can help you. If you don't...

Pakistan is a relatively insignificant country, especially when one talks of the biggest populations, economies, militarizes of the world. No need to boost your ego by trying to sneak in backdoor and be clubbed with India and China. Pakistan is nothing. No economy. No foreign policy of...

I hate it the way India is being pushed against China, as a mix of factors both in and beyond its control. India-China enmity doesn't benefit 40% of the world.

Your countryman, Mr. Haider, is making the claim of the figure being 95-97/5-3 %. That without an official Pakistani source/spokesperson to back it up.

A simple analogy: An ant growing faster than an elephant doesn't make the ant stronger than the elephant. Really? You obviously have no idea how much influence Uncle Sam exercises over the global economy. My advice, ask an economist. ...and please make sure it's not Riaz Haq you refer...

I'm sure that whatever price it might be, it would exact a far heavier toll on Pakistan, both monetary and military, than it would on the US.

Ohh! So is it normal for the Pakistani NA to lie to the Pakistani people by falsely claiming that an exaggerated number of innocent civilians are being killed in the drone strikes when it is not so? Oh and generic statements are no use. When you give figures such as 95-97/5-3 %, be ready to...

Either it is you who is lying or it is the people/media/body politik/national assembly of Pakistan that is/are lying. Which one is it? BTW, I would very much like to see a Pakistani Official claiming that ratio of 95-97/5-3 %.

I'm sorry my knowledge of English fails me when it comes to that sentence.