Search results

As the world speaks of AESA the other side moves on with 400billion $ budget,

Malay since you are talking of RCS... ;) Neo I'm not too sure about PAF being able to afford rafale and typhoon in numbers, either way the day you will start inducting that we will move a step ahead, economies is what determines such even with J10 and jf17 PAF's asset is not net...

Rafale uses slotted array radar, let me tell you something here what we are trying to achieve with MMR is in the level of Rafales slotted array radar.... no AESA does not loose importance over net centric warfare, what is net centriuc? LOOK FIRST, TRANSMIT DATA FAST AND FIRST KILL FIRST...

Absolutely SURE, Will provide sources tomorrow... Russian AESA is not yet developed fully, NIIP guys categorically said in AI we need to work with your scientist for the 1080 module AESA. Avionics can be Russian but the electronics of avionics should be Indian, why do you think we will go...

Honestly I would hate that :tsk: :tsk: 5 years? more like 10 years atleast if they wants first get the J10's. By then MCA and PAKFA :devil: As I said Rafale needed to be optimised for naval role can be used for dual purpose from Indian carriers INCASE DIRE STRAITS OF NECESSITY...

Neo Rafale cannot beat a fighter equipped with AESA... but the french are coming and that too directly with GAN MODULED AESA 10x times the power of Current TR modules consuming 10x less energy!!!

To me personally I like the Mig 29 OVT airframe above all, but like the EJ 2000 engine and the Elta 2052 radar. Rest sensor fusion etc can be done if IAF spills money we dont lack electronics expertise.

Neo 6 years to decide which aircraft to buy lol, trust me it'll take 3-4 years sor sure, by then EJ engine will have TVC, Integrating TVC will take atleast 5 years, demostrating TVC which we have done in missiles first stage is different than putting it in aero engine and doing the flight...

Dont forget one thing EF is very crude fighter much like Raptor, powerful, big Radome et al while Rafale is tactical much like JSF, optimized for carrier thus its special design.

NEO MKI of Mig 35 is a CERTAINITY IF IT IS CHOSEN, The russians havent yet developed it completely, the AESA is not yet developed. NIIP openly claimed in Aero India they lacks processing power of OAC (open architecture computers0 small enough to deal with 1080 TR/RX moduled AESa the reason...

Neo I said EJ 2000 MLU, they are developing a TVC for EJ 2000 so it wont be much of problem having TVC 6 years down the line. Check it, http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk/Eurofighter/engines.html Malay RCS is classified figure, but from, design perspective a little bit of airflow idea...

no idea, but i heard it happened, Russians has a famous record of creating some sort of issue in paris air show, in Aero India they brough 10 pair of Engines incase the engine screws up! Seriously enough of this RD crap! I'm willing to take Mig 29OVt but only its airframe, put EJ 2000 MLU...

malay not really Rafale lacks power. to me it is better than Eurofighter, what it needs is better power.... It is impossible to distinguish between EF and Rafale like that, EF's engine is better while Rafales lack power. Rafales canard-delta design is stealthier compared to Ef's design, EF...

The reva was developed by DRDO isnt? and tech transferred to pvt industry? the fuel cell car? or thats a diff one?

Canarded fighter actually adds up to its RCS, plus a fighter with external stores, RCS does not matters much. Rafale to me has the best design among all the canard-deltas....and I'd love if it wins the MRCA...

dont you think we have heard this news, its time for officials to stop saying the same news over and over lol.

malay no airframe like that gets obsolete, the Raptors airframe is of 80's tech developed in 70, so aerodynamics has been stagnant for years and years in fighter arena what matters what is going isnide. Mig 35 needs to be indiagenoused which will take generous amout of time that thing is half...

It would be much better if without quoting articles one reads the reports themselves, a clear relevation of the Chinese being all saints in the war busted along with a faulty and absurd Indian leadership of Nehru. http://www.foia.cia.gov/cpe.asp The 147 documents in this collection...

yeah Z bhai eat cheap goods of tata birla, and what about the 3 billion dollar investment? the Jobs it will create? Why dont you ask your govt to dump our goods and opt for "Costlier" European goods since our ones are cheap ones? MBI Munshi, if not for Nehru facilitated Calcutta udner...

Batman I dont see my post being equated with any naiveness, perhaps you missed the questions mark? which means i'm asking and not proposing.