Search results

ME says murder the peaceniks who propose talks first .Lahore declaration then Kargil.Composite dialogue -26\11.Now this.Sometime I feel the inveitable thing should be done.How many more of our countrymen should we loose to this indiscriminate bombings

What is the quid pro quo US has to offer for talks with pakistan

male :-),its an evil yindoo name:P

do a lot of quantitative aptitude and analytical reasoning enroll for online tests

but vitriol no thanks

Sir tell him not to spare that ba*** angry:

At most **** of an article .Poor Javed Naqvi angry on MMS for opening the free market forces,hence making the Indian economy grow and hence helped in widening the military parity between the neighbours bad,bad,bad. Javed Naqvi seems to have vented all his mental frustrations in the article .I...

Gentlemen here is some food for thought Fatman17 sir especially for you regarding Cold Start India can take on Pak & China simultaneously Indian detterence doctrine Do India need WMD? - Page 2 India and Nuclear testing and how detterence works in the case of China and India Indian...

Gentlemen here is some food for thought Fatman17 sir especially for you regarding Cold Start India can take on Pak & China simultaneously Indian detterence doctrine Do India need WMD? - Page 2 India and Nuclear testing and how detterence works in the case of China and India Indian Nuclear...

Previous used to think of direct action.Nowadays generation is using the monkeys Trap and Cold start doctrines

Bigger booster ,more payload,more satellites launched ,more business,more money

a)If not for Sharif,your Karachi port would have been in Cinders and the Strike corps would have been sitting in Lahore.We had already blockaded your port and you were left high and dry PS:We may have even blockaded the Indus river waters.Well in love and war everything is fair b)1965-Ayubs...

Gentlemen sorry to barge invited but this is want an esteemed Indian officer had to say about the Pakistani response to Indian retaliation in the following forum.Please read POST# 22 from the link I posted below India can take on Pak & China simultaneously - Page 2 See that my country...

how much verbal diaorrhea everyone spews on this forum.The harsh truth is it belongs to Indias india's only.Right now our neighbour is a nobody in the world cares about pakistans stance .The Indian establishment is seeing pakistan stewing in its own juices for the nxt decade so no problem for us

no one in the indian establishment wants peace with pakistan,no need of harmony no thanks

IF you read his blog you can trace a lot of misplaced frustration in him.An inferiority complex

It was because they were banking on the GoI to provide security to the players,which the GoI naturally refused as it is a private tournament,then it may have it them that pak players are simply not viable for the buck they are paying.A case of late realization on the franchises part

It was not that AM, 26\11 is still fresh in the mindsof the public and no one knows when the two bit non-state actors from the other side of the border will launch another strike .When such a scenario is looming it is sound business sense to not invest in pakistani players.Good for them and good...

Bong sense of humour Huh