What's new

Search results

  1. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    This is the problem in Pakistan, the civilian military equation, there shouldn't be two different entities, military and civilian government should be complementing each other instead of fighting it out who are the boss, and who calls the shot. There shouldn't be any confrontation between the...
  2. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    What is your point here exactly, according to Geneva rule about POW's pilots have to be released within a stipulated period of time. And that was also a goodwill CBM measure, like slap hard but later be lenient and show goodwill and compassion. Ho Halqa-e-Yaran To Baresham Ki Tarah Naram...
  3. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    It's mostly in bits and pieces, not some blanket approval or stereotyping the whole nation. Like judging India by Modi and BJP, the Hindutvadis and Hindutva reign hegemon gives us the bad vibes, the Babri mosque desecration, the Gujrat riots and killings, the Beef related killings of 44...
  4. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    It is an axiom of practical politics never to believe anything until it has been officially denied. US and India denying it... It's basically Bajwa, tangeein kaanp Rahi theein, maathay per paseena tha. Bullies are cowards, so are the traitors.
  5. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    He accepted it openly. He said he misunderstood the military establishment. And military establishment misunderstood him as well, IK added. Alluding to the fact that establishment will work against corruption with him, the government, and corrupt people like Shahbaz becoming PM is out of...
  6. N.Siddiqui

    No Pakistani General has ever succeeded; not will Asim Munir!

    No damage was done with nukes here to stay.
  7. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Yes true, he is not a politician, not the new politician on the block, people have high regard for him as a leader of sorts, all and every politician in the country are united against him. People knew he is not our standard political class person. And people thought this would be a good thing...
  8. N.Siddiqui

    No Pakistani General has ever succeeded; not will Asim Munir!

    Abdul qadeer was a scapegoat, anyways that was a sarcasm, written in lighter vein.
  9. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    It's like this. People who don't lie expect others as not lying, contrary to a liar who will think that the other person is also a liar. Similarly a person who is trustworthy will trust others, a deceiver will think of others as deceivers too. Imran Khan is just to simple minded and at times...
  10. N.Siddiqui

    No Pakistani General has ever succeeded; not will Asim Munir!

    He is a kind of Pakistan own chaddi dharis.
  11. N.Siddiqui

    Caught in a cleft stick - India asked PM Hasina to drop 5 influential ministers for close relation with China

    For close relations or to close the relations. India will always act like a hegemon.
  12. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Am doing this on purpose, to get the people shift from too much of anti fauj propaganda, which is damaging to Pakistan, an Awam versus Army is the worst case scenario. And to evoke the India centric thought, that might be helpful to Pakistan and to subdue the over the board propaganda against...
  13. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Than why did he moved to Pakistan a country created by kafir e Azam, as per his thought about Jinnah. The contradictory statement my mullahs are not new. There must be many who were against the creation of Pakistan initially in India, but waking up to Hindu hatred for Muslims realized it was a...
  14. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Sarkari indian mullahs was against the creation of Pakistan, maybe on Hindu elders payroll. And to your earlier comment, east and west Pakistan as one entity proved far fetched. But the idea of separate homeland for Muslims is very much there even with BD created. It's not that BD merged with...
  15. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Why was than he called the Butcher of Gujrat. That large scale killing of Muslims led Modi to become a Hindutva leader, anti Muslim, and later to become the PM of Bharat. That Gujrat massacre was his biggest achievement, a political game changer.
  16. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Jinnah had nothing to do with it. It was a Bhutto narcissist thought to rule and establishment idiotic thought that they can do it with force. A convergence of stupidity.
  17. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    You need to engage with people even to insult them, to debunk them, to don't give a shit. And to break their propaganda, the media falsehood, which India is an expert. Just quitting and keeping quiet would be counter productive.
  18. N.Siddiqui

    If the Generals knew the India role in regime change, could it be stopped, evoking some India centric Ghairat.

    Just as Jinnah did to get Pakistan, he compromised with Britishers, with Gandhi, with India, and with Muslims to achieve a bigger goal. Imran Khan was compromising with the establishment, the elephant in the room, to reach a bigger goal.
Back
Top Bottom