the fact is u are just stupid....if u just look at the colonial history of US u will understand beyond doubt that the reference is indisputably made about red indians....in US red indians are just called as indians, hence it can be said so.....read the history of thanksgiving day for better...
u didn't even bother to understand the article before starting to troll......the word indians here means red indians.....obviously u don't whats that, beacause u are too illiterate to know abt that, isn't it????
don't get so emotional dude, China maybe a good friend to pakistan, but this drama of supporting pakistan is fishy, you should look for the facts for yourself.....tell me, other than supplying pakistan with weapons, what has china done for it????
really??? saying the truth may be bad in your country, where people are killed for speaking the truth......but the fact stands that the biggest beneficiary of NATO attack is China.....
by backing up do u mean shouting in UN and exporting them weapons to earn huge profits?????
its very clear what china's actual intentions are, i think there is even a possibility that the current NATO attack had an involvement of China too....
people always keep saying that, but karzai has remained in power till now, US is not a fool, if they are leaving before 2014, they will have a plan to make sure that afghanistan doesn't falls in the hands of taliban......
as far as i see it, china is the biggest beneficiary of NATO attack, now they can export more weapons to pakistan, and use pakistan to counter US......
i thought china said that attack on pakistan will be considered as attack on china, why are they sitting and only talking now??? why not respond to the attack?///