What's new

Bakhshali manuscript from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa has the earliest recorded origin of the zero symbol

True but to put it diplomatically we rejoice what we do not share [7,000 years of Indus] with you and eternally regret what we share with you. The "share" being the bloody 98 years we spent with you under the British imposed rule.

98 cursed years. Damn the British for that.

Please don't bring your bias because you feel certain way.
 
Indian's are like ugly b*tch you laid when you were drunk - but when your sober you want desperately to forget the ignominy your d*ck brought on yourself. But now you can't rid of her because she thinks just because you gave her one in drunken desperation she owns you.

And keeps coming back, again, again and again. And does not know the meaning "f*uck off".

At a given point I read your posts and find some nice gems in them that really hit the spot.

And then I run into stuff like this!!! :O :O
 
Instead of a rebuttal you are spewing insults, log off you have already lost Gangadweller.
Don't be such thin skinned... you said Hindu term was invented by British, I showed you much earlier use.. correct yourself and move on..
 
In regards to religion yes it was. Hind is merely a region not a religious faith PERIOD,,,,well until the damn Brits arrived.
It is not a religion even now.. it is collection of indeginous beleafs. And yor ancestors were part of one or the other belief..ergo hindus.
 
Actually my ancestors were probably Buddhists before accepting Islam.

People of Indus river valley hated people of the Ganga! lol :lol:
Buddhists were converted hindus. And you were damn right about "indus" people hating "ganga" people..
 
It is not a religion even now.. it is collection of indeginous beleafs. And yor ancestors were part of one or the other belief..ergo hindus.
Now I can see why Nehru nor the supreme court of India could define Hinduism,,,,,Never the less, thank you for attempting to explain whatever you tried to explain...... BTW who decides "indigenous" , you, Nehru,,,Adi Shankara , for if we are to listen to the words of Adi Shankara what is now my land Ghandaran region has nothing to do with four mathas of supposed Bharat, so whose definition of India do we accept, yours , Adi's ....the Brits lol
 
Last edited:
Now I can see why Nehru nor the supreme court of India could define Hinduism,,,,,Never the less, thank you for attempting to explain whatever you tried to explain.
I feel like Einstein trying to explain theory of relativity to the world!
 
I feel like Einstein trying to explain theory of relativity to the world!
BTW who decides "indigenous" , you, Nehru,,,Adi Shankara , for if we are to listen to the words of Adi Shankara what is now my land Ghandaran region has nothing to do with four mathas of supposed Bharat, so whose definition of India do we accept, yours , Adi's ....the Brits lol, the whole concept is one big mess:lol::lol:

Relativistic mechanics are like child play compared to defining so called India lol.
 
BTW who decides "indigenous" , you, Nehru,,,Adi Shankara , for if we are to listen to the words of Adi Shankara what is now my land Ghandaran region has nothing to do with four mathas of supposed Bharat, so whose definition of India do we accept, yours , Adi's ....the Brits lol, the whole concept is one big mess:lol::lol:
Geography. That has been always the definition..
 

Back
Top Bottom