What's new

Reliance Power bags $1.3 billion LNG-based project in energy-starved Bangladesh

Bilal9

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
26,545
Reaction score
9
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
May 5, 2016 11:30 pm JST
Reliance Power bags $1.3 billion LNG-based project in energy-starved Bangladesh
KIRAN SHARMA, Nikkei staff writer

NEW DELHI -- Indian energy firms are aggressively seeking to expand their presence in neighboring Bangladesh, which is aiming to double its power generation capacity to 24 gigawatts a day by 2021 to meet growing demands.

Reliance Power is the latest company to announce that it will set up a 750 megawatt liquefied natural gas-based plant along with a floating storage and regasification unit (known as FSRU) in Bangladesh at an estimated cost of $1.3 billion.

The company is part of Reliance Group, which is led by Anil Ambani, brother of Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani. It is involved in many power projects in India's private sector, including in coal, gas, hydro and renewable energy.

In a stock exchange filing in Mumbai, Reliance Power said the Bangladesh government had given approval in-principle for the power plant, which will be set up at the Meghnaghat area, around 40km southeast of the capital city of Dhaka. The land for the plant will be provided by the Bangladesh Power Development Board.

Under the project, the FSRU terminal will be established at Maheshkhali Island in the Cox's Bazar district of Bangladesh.

"This will be the largest foreign direct investment in Bangladesh with a potential investment of over $1.3 billion," Reliance Power said.

The project is part of a memorandum of understanding signed between Reliance Power and the BPDB in June last year during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Dhaka visit. The MoU spoke of developing in phases a 3,000MW LNG-based combined cycle power project in Bangladesh at an estimated investment of about $3 billion.

A combined cycle power plant is highly efficient as it uses both gas and steam turbines to produce electricity. The gas turbine produces electricity using natural gas, while the steam one generates additional power with the waste heat from the gas turbine.

The approval from the Bangladesh government has come for the first phase, which will be commissioned in the financial year beginning April 2018. This will be the largest such project in the country.

As of April 10, Bangladesh’s total installed power generation capacity was about 12.3GW a day, and it was producing around 8.3GW. Only 60% of Bangladesh's population of 160 million has access to electricity, while the country's power demand is growing at a rate of 10% annually.

Modi said in Dhaka last year that India can be a major partner in achieving Bangladesh's goal of installing 24GW capacity. He requested Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to facilitate the entry of Indian companies into Bangladesh's power generation, transmission and distribution sector.

Separately, India's Adani Gas, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Adani Enterprises,is seeking to grab a segment of Bangladesh’s cooking gas sector, which is heavily dependent on imports.

The company recently submitted an expression of interest to India's Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board for "laying, building, operating or expanding" a 650 km liquefied petroleum gas pipeline, from its proposed LPG terminal in eastern Odisha state to West Bengal state's Asansol area, as well as its Duttapulia region near the Bangladesh border.

Adani Group is constructing a 1.6 million ton capacity LPG terminal at Odisha's Dhamra port. The project is slated for completion by mid-2018. By seeking to construct the pipeline, the company aims to supply gas to central and eastern parts of India as well as to Bangladesh.

Last month, state-run Indian Oil Corp. inked a pact with Bangladesh Petroleum Corp. to explore ways of setting up an LPG import terminal at Bangladesh's Chittagong coastal region and laying a pipeline from there to the eastern Indian state of Tripura.

Bangladeshi private companies import about 150,000 tons of LPG per year while the state-run BPC produces just 20,000 tons locally -- but the combined total is still less than half of the country's total annual demand.

Given the abundance of opportunities in power- and gas-deficient Bangladesh, Indian private and state-run firms have their sights set firmly on their neighbor.
 
Something new this time....or will it be the same barrage of usual comments by usual quarters? :D
 
hopefully no controversy by Bangladeshis this time
 
India-Bangladesh should come together and start a combine exploration in the region. Both the nations are on the good growth trajectory. Plus I think we are enjoying the best phase of the Bilateral relation since 1971. After transit & border dispute resolution it's time to solve Teesta river water sharing issue, but many things are depending on results of West Bengal elections.
Personally I would love to see Bangladesh as the 2nd largest economy of the region by 2025 AD.
 
I doubt it will be easy...
 
I doubt it will be easy...

Well, BD government never provide anything free to the private companies, but for Indian they always come here with a list of stuffs they expect would be free for them from the government. That's the basic problem nothing else. They think BD government is dumber than Indian government which is actually the opposite.
 
Well, BD government never provide anything free to the private companies, but for Indian they always come here with a list of stuffs they expect would be free for them from the government. That's the basic problem nothing else. They think BD government is dumber than Indian government.
every govt does it... for investment.. govt in India does it for foreign companies to attract FDI... give subsidy and tax breaks and cheaper land. bd is no special. its not as if FDI is raining on bd.
anyway, I would prefer if reliance invests within India, but then why would corporates be driven by national interest.
 
every govt does it... for investment.. govt in India does it for foreign companies to attract FDI... give subsidy and tax breaks and cheaper land. bd is no special. its not as if FDI is raining on bd.
anyway, I would prefer if reliance invests within India, but then why would corporates be driven by national interest.

FDI is great but we got used to without it. Great domestic companies are popping up and I hope it will remain this way. By the way we already provided Indians with Special Economic Zone and after all those hustling and bustling not much going on there, whereas Chinese and Japanese SEZs are cruising ahead. ;)
 
FDI is great but we got used to without it. Great domestic companies are popping up and I hope it will remain this way.
I wish you luck then.
I want more FDI in India though, wherever the company might be from. More investment means more jobs, more prosperity, more competition. I want the red tape to be reduced so that its easy to invest in India. Once its attractive destination, we wont need to give discounts or tax breaks, the investment money will find its way automatically.
 
I wish you luck then.
I want more FDI in India though, wherever the company might be from. More investment means more jobs, more prosperity, more competition. I want the red tape to be reduced so that its easy to invest in India. Once its attractive destination, we wont need to give discounts or tax breaks, the investment money will find its way automatically.

Well, India is still in the primitive stage. But from the experience of Thailand, Vietnam and newly Myanmar, we dont want to go to that path. FDI/Gross Domestic Savings should be less than 5%. As our Gorss Domestic Savings are around 60 billion, so another 1/2 billion dollar we need for 5% threshold and I am sure we can get that easy. That will increase 0.5% point of our GDP growth rate.
 
Well, India is still in the primitive stage. But from the experience of Thailand, Vietnam and newly Myanmar, we dont want to go to that path. FDI/Gross Domestic Savings should be less than 5%. As our Gorss Domestic Savings are around 60 billion, so another 1/2 billion dollar we need for 5% threshold and I am sure we can get that easy. That will increase 0.5% point of our GDP growth rate.
I dont get it.. so primitive India is after FDI, but lower than primitive bd will manage it with their own savings? if your saving is low should you deliberately look at low FDI to get that 5% threshold. Its quite odd logic.

malayasia, indonesia, thailand and china are success stories we would love to emulate, at some stage.
 
I dont get it.. so primitive India is after FDI, but lower than primitive bd will manage it with their own savings? if your saving is low should you deliberately look at low FDI to get that 5% threshold. Its quite odd logic.

malayasia, indonesia, thailand and china are success stories we would love to emulate, at some stage.

It is more to do with Indian compulsion to cover the current account deficit than growth. BD posts healthy current account surplus years after year.

None of the stories except China are success as Chinese domestic investment was so high that it offset FDI dominance in their economy and that is the reason they are the one in the sure path of becoming the high income country. Chinese FDI was always 5-10% of GDCF except few years here and there.

Thailand is a complete lost cause but you are presenting it a success. They are dropped from the list of economy which will be able to graduate to high income economy.
 
I dont get it.. so primitive India is after FDI, but lower than primitive bd will manage it with their own savings? if your saving is low should you deliberately look at low FDI to get that 5% threshold. Its quite odd logic.

malayasia, indonesia, thailand and china are success stories we would love to emulate, at some stage.

This guy is a known ostrich with head in sand that refuses to see basic Bangladesh failure in attracting investment and will go to any length to project it actually as some success of internal resilience or whatever.

It is pointless trying to reason with him (head stuck in sand)....best to keep the FDI turnaround going in India and get our GCF back to mid 30% range and try get it to 40% even....while they can keep their "non-FDI" banian economy and wonder why they have to import bajaj pulsars in increasing number from India.

And then he quotes that FDI in China was always below 10% in terms of GCF, not realising it is about 10% for India currently now as well.
 
Well, India is still in the primitive stage. But from the experience of Thailand, Vietnam and newly Myanmar, we dont want to go to that path. FDI/Gross Domestic Savings should be less than 5%. As our Gorss Domestic Savings are around 60 billion, so another 1/2 billion dollar we need for 5% threshold and I am sure we can get that easy. That will increase 0.5% point of our GDP growth rate.

Does Bangladesh even produce nuts and bolts? What is the level of industrialization in your country except exploiting woman labour for fulfilling EU and USA granted benevolent quotas?
 
Does Bangladesh even produce nuts and bolts? What is the level of industrialization in your country except exploiting woman labour for fulfilling EU and USA granted benevolent quotas?

They will bring up Walton such and such.

Here is the wiki site:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walton_Group

Tell me if you are able to find basic financial parameters for this group (revenue, net income etc)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom