according to pakistan defence-india didnt exist untill 1947.

[mkb95]

Pakistan Defence ‏@defencepk
India didn't exist until the 15th of August 1947. @shahhiral11 @ShivAroor

• Retweets 12
• Likes 33
• 

7:45 AM - 23 Nov 2015
went through their twitter feed,someone is obsessed with india.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Whatever makes them happy... please don't steal them of their moment... this is how they justify their existance.

 

[GURU DUTT]

Pakistan Defence ‏@defencepk
India didn't exist until the 15th of August 1947. @shahhiral11 @ShivAroor

• Retweets 12
• Likes 33
• 

7:45 AM - 23 Nov 2015
went through their twitter feed,someone is obsessed with india.

who cares what they think of india but there is also one more fact they say they are not ethnically indian origin but use hindu caste names like rajput , rana , rao , Khokharr , saigal but at the same time also are decendants of turks , arabs , iranians , central asians..... interesting naa

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

According to Indians, Bangladesh didn't exist before 1971.

 

[TheNoob]

who cares what they think of india but there is also one more fact they say they are not ethnically indian origin but use hindu caste names like rajput , rana , rao , Khokharr , saigal but at the same time also are decendants of turks , arabs , iranians , central asians..... interesting naa

IF you really think we're originally of indian ethic.
I pity you.

But yes, Officially and statiscally, You did not exist until 15th August.
Just like Pakistan until 14th August.

This thread, and some users here, Are literally, an insult to the common intelligence of human beings.

 

[Jacob Martin]

who cares what they think of india but there is also one more fact they say they are not ethnically indian origin but use hindu caste names like rajput , rana , rao , Khokharr , saigal but at the same time also are decendants of turks , arabs , iranians , central asians..... interesting naa

The use of Urdu became mainstream in Pakistan only post-Partition, again in order to "create" a "unique" identity that didn't exist until then. What is referred to as Urdu today was referred to as Hindi until the 19th century. Even their language is imported.

According to Indians, Bangladesh didn't exist before 1971.

Yes it didn't. It was East Pakistan - no matter how preposterous an idea that might have been. Show me ONE text before 1971 that mentions the name Bangladesh.

 

[Jacob Martin]

IF you really think we're originally of indian ethic.
I pity you.

Then leave this land, as you wish the Israelis to leave their land claiming that they are Europeans.

 

[GURU DUTT]

The use of Urdu became mainstream in Pakistan only post-Partition, again in order to "create" a "unique" identity that didn't exist until then. What is referred to as Urdu today was referred to as Hindi until the 19th century. Even their language is imported.



Yes it didn't. It was East Pakistan - no matter how preposterous an idea that might have been. Show me ONE text before 1971 that mentions the name Bangladesh.

Urdu, like Hindi, is a form of Hindustani. It evolved from the medieval (6th to 13th century) Apabhraṃśa register of the preceding Shauraseni language, a Middle Indo-Aryan language that is also the ancestor of other modern languages, including the Punjabi dialects. Urdu developed under the influence of the Persian and Arabic languages, both of which have contributed a significant amount of vocabulary to formal speech. Around 99% of Urdu verbs have their roots in Sanskrit and Prakrit.

Although the word Urdu itself is derived from the Turkic word ordu (army) or orda, from which English horde is also derived, Turkish borrowings in Urdu are minimal. Urdu words originating from Turkish and Arabic were borrowed through Persian and hence are Persianized versions of the original words. For instance, the Arabic ta' marbuta ( ة ) changes to he ( ه ) or te (
Arabic influence in the region began with the late first millennium Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent. The Persian language was introduced into the subcontinent a few centuries later by various Persianized Central Asian Turkic and Afghan dynasties including that of Mahmud of Ghazni. The Turko-Afghan Delhi Sultanate established Persian as its official language, a policy continued by the Mughal Empire, which extended over most of northern South Asia from the 16th to 18th centuries and cemented Persian influence on the developing Hindustani.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urdu

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

Yes it didn't. It was East Pakistan - no matter how preposterous an idea that might have been. Show me ONE text before 1971 that mentions the name Bangladesh.

Well, in that case India didn't exist before that either.

 

[mkb95]

IF you really think we're originally of indian ethic.
I pity you.

But yes, Officially and statiscally, You did not exist until 15th August.
Just like Pakistan until 14th August.

This thread, and some users here, Are literally, an insult to the common intelligence of human beings.

then why it was called east INDIA company?
two things happened in 1947
india was freed
pakistan was created.
dont put both countries in same league.
and "officialy" and "statisticaly" dont put random words together.

 

[danish_vij]

According to Indians, Bangladesh didn't exist before 1971.

what according to indians?? so u mean acc to pakistanis bangladesh existed before 1971? waake up dude

 

[Great Sachin]

According to Indians, Bangladesh didn't exist before 1971.

is it not true.....ask Pakistan they still don't recognize you

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

is it not true.....ask Pakistan they still don't recognize you

It's only India that doesn't.

 

[Jacob Martin]

Urdu, like Hindi, is a form of Hindustani. It evolved from the medieval (6th to 13th century) Apabhraṃśa register of the preceding Shauraseni language, a Middle Indo-Aryan language that is also the ancestor of other modern languages, including the Punjabi dialects. Urdu developed under the influence of the Persian and Arabic languages, both of which have contributed a significant amount of vocabulary to formal speech. Around 99% of Urdu verbs have their roots in Sanskrit and Prakrit.

Although the word Urdu itself is derived from the Turkic word ordu (army) or orda, from which English horde is also derived, Turkish borrowings in Urdu are minimal. Urdu words originating from Turkish and Arabic were borrowed through Persian and hence are Persianized versions of the original words. For instance, the Arabic ta' marbuta ( ة ) changes to he ( ه ) or te (

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urdu

The origins of the word Urdu is yet another reason for the deluded mindset of Pakistanis. Because, as you pointed out, the Turkic origin meant army camp, so they started calling it "lashkari zabaan" (martial language) after importing it from UP. Thereby further feeding into the failed state Martial mindset that makes them perpetually belligerent and over-confident in their military abilities. Mind you - all this over a language borrowed from India as late as post-independece!

Now imagine the decadent Nawaabs of Awadh smoking hukkah, eating galouti kebabs, watching dancers and speaking in the "lashkari jabaan"!!!

 

[GURU DUTT]

According to Indians, Bangladesh didn't exist before 1971.

or did it ?

before 1947 it was called east bengal and after 1971 it was renamed Bangladesh looks like you are more confused than ... kahir jane do sanu ki