What's new

Indian forces took part in Lankan war(2009): Plea

It was PAF Mirage jets and pilots that were deployed in 2009 war. Not SSG

From what I can make with extensive google search, the pilots were stationed at Colombo, and were involved in planning air strike missions and assisting their counterparts in the SLAF. No info regarding any sorties being flown by the PAF pilots, so this refutes the idea of 'active combat involvement', which though he claimed in the case of SSG, but doesn't comply in the case of PAF pilots too.
 
From what I can make with extensive google search, the pilots were stationed at Colombo, and were involved in planning air strike missions and assisting their counterparts in the SLAF. No info regarding any sorties being flown by the PAF pilots, so this refutes the idea of 'active combat involvement', which though he claimed in the case of SSG, but doesn't comply in the case of PAF pilots too.

Well that bit can't be disclosed. It did occur initially when PAF pilots conducted several bombing themselves.
 
HAHAHA well i can understand this might be a little hard to digest as its just natural. But they were the most Great Rulers yr country ever had. BTW im a Azad Kashmiri so obvious Himalayan But our areas never fought against our own rather we had supported them all along.
greatest ruler was Samrat Ashok from far east asia to far west of afghanistan

HAHAHA well i can understand this might be a little hard to digest as its just natural. But they were the most Great Rulers yr country ever had. BTW im a Azad Kashmiri so obvious Himalayan But our areas never fought against our own rather we had supported them all along.
Kashmir was snatched from Mughals, that's why he had a Hindu Raja. Bhai Itihas(tareekh) parh ke aja
Fateh Shah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Well that bit can't be disclosed. It did occur initially when PAF pilots conducted several bombing themselves.

They may well have, I'm not denying. Simply asking for the source of that claim, or as a matter of fact, how do YOU know if it was never disclosed? (Or if I'm mistaken and you're saying you can't disclose)
 
greatest ruler was Samrat Ashok from far east asia to far west of afghanistan
O pagal we had achieved that in the times Akbar as well. But more land mass is no criteria for greatness anyways.

[/quote]Kashmir was snatched from Mughals, that's why he had a Hindu Raja. Bhai Itihas(tareekh) parh ke aja[/quote]
who hari singh?
 
O pagal we had achieved that in the times Akbar as well. But more land mass is no criteria for greatness anyways.

Kashmir was snatched from Mughals, that's why he had a Hindu Raja. Bhai Itihas(tareekh) parh ke aja
who hari singh?
What I remember, the last raja was a Rajput not a Mughal and Yes hari singh! And kindly google Kingdom of Garhwal, Kumaon. Mughals tried till last breath but could never conquer that part of India. Those are proper himalyan kingdoms. rest were considered under Punjab.
 
They may well have, I'm not denying. Simply asking for the source of that claim, or as a matter of fact, how do YOU know if it was never disclosed? (Or if I'm mistaken and you're saying you can't disclose)

The Janes article which published in 2010 ( or 2011). Though stated as rumour by them as well, that Sri lankan jets were not properly quipped for precision strikes nor they had any training for conducting such strikes. So PAF pilots trained them as well as conducted bomb strikes initially.

And about not disclosing such facts. Because Our ambassador in Sri Lanka survived an assassination attempt in 2009 ( Bomb blast). If disclosing Pakistan involvement, we would have had face more serious retaliations from tamils.
 
Kashmir was snatched from Mughals, that's why he had a Hindu Raja. Bhai Itihas(tareekh) parh ke aja
who hari singh?[/quote]
What I remember, the last raja was a Rajput not a Mughal. And kindly google Kingdom of Garhwal, Kumaon. Mughals tried till last breath but could never conquer that part of India.[/quote]
O bhai, I have already mentioned u that in times of Akbar we were ruling yr entire country. If im not wrong after Ashoka if somebody was able to unite yr kind then it was Akbar, otherwise u guys were all those blood thirsty scavengers u would have killed reach other. Anyways thats not the topic here and i have also prove my point abt SSG. So there is no point in further discussing this.......Im Signing off this thread. Bye.
 
who hari singh?
What I remember, the last raja was a Rajput not a Mughal. And kindly google Kingdom of Garhwal, Kumaon. Mughals tried till last breath but could never conquer that part of India.
O bhai, I have already mentioned u that in times of Akbar we were ruling yr entire country. If im not wrong after Ashoka if somebody was able to unite yr kind then it was Akbar, otherwise u guys were all those blood thirsty scavengers u would have killed reach other. Anyways thats not the topic here and i have also prove my point abt SSG. So there is no point in further discussing this.......Im Signing off this thread. Bye.

lol, entire country? i asked you to google. many parts were left. Any ways, what ever you proved was just a pic. such pics are not called as proof here. Bye.
 
Intelligence squads which had infiltrated Tiger defences were able to vector attacks, taking out several top Tiger leaders with air-delivered precision guided munitions provided by Pakistan. Chief of the air staff air Marshal Roshan Gunatilleke steadfastly refuted the allegation that Pakistan air Force (PAF) pilots flew their aircraft.

Source: Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Conflict: How Eelam War IV was Won
Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi

And about not disclosing such facts. Because Our ambassador in Sri Lanka survived an assassination attempt in 2009 ( Bomb blast). If disclosing Pakistan involvement, we would have had face more serious retaliations from tamils.

Yeah, could well be. I think we can rest our case here.
 
lol, entire country? i asked you to google. many parts were left. Any ways, what ever you proved was just a pic. such pics are not called as proof here. Bye.
Dude i think i have made it clear already that i have made my point Abt SSG from where the discussion gone so off topic that now its in past. Thats why im not going to reply again.
 
pakistan has deployed SSG all along them world! SSG's one company still guards the House of Saud of Saudi Royal Family. In past it has deployed them in Afghanistan, Iran, ME countries including Lebanon, Palestine, Bosnia Srilanka etc etc. Visit SSG pictures thread to see the pictures of SSG in Srilanka against Tamil terrorists.

i was talking about SSG's combat deployment in overseas, not about their deployment for training. SSG's deployment in SA is not combat deployment....SA is not at war...Afghanistan, Iran, and SA are pakistan's neighboring countries. i don't know about the deployment of SSG in ME countries....

my be you are talking about this: https://defence.pk/attachments/1535561_588432891227978_653740545_n-jpg.13033/
that SSG officer(as u said) dos't look like he is in the middle of war-zone, he looks more to a trainer.
 
Dude i think i have made it clear already that i have made my point Abt SSG from where the discussion gone so off topic that now its in past. Thats why im not going to reply again.

If SSG was involved in killing LTTE then Pakistan would have been summoned by UNSC for war crimes along with Lankan Military. ONly intel, logistic and training was there not strike. But the point is Pakistan took interest in our backyard which gives India full rights to be present in Afghanistan!

And for your small information. Recon is intelligence unit.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom