What's new

Ghaggar-Hakra believed to be mythical Rig Veda Sarasvati river proven false

We have been monotheists since Noah.

You invaded us and converted us to Hinduism and planted your monarchy on us.

That is we created Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism in pursuit of the singularity of God.

You converted us, we have reverted back to our true beliefs.

Noah is called "adam-e-sani ,BECAUSE the world began again AFTER the great flood .only those people who were in the ship of noah were alive and others were dead and all were muslims and many of them became saints but after along time (may be in the time of hazrat sheen )satan did his work again and forced and kept in the mind of the generations of the son of nooh and other people to make the idol of the ur saints and pious people to remember them and then gradually they started to worship of those people . ..
satan iblles and Religion ka hamesha takroo rehta he .......EVEN SATAN can use religion for political purpose .....
when GOD SAID to iblles (when he did not bow to adam )that u r free till qayamat ,u can do wat ever u want till qayama and he sent iblees on earth ....iss liye buraee and achaee ka takrao hota he :pop:
 
Lord Buddha never visited places outside Nepal, Bihar and UP.



:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Gandhara is the region that now comprise of Peshawar valley, Mardan, Swat, Dir, Malakand, and Bajuaur agencies in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Taxila in the Punjab, and up to Jalalabad in Afghanistan. It is in this region that the Gandhara civilization emerged and became the cradle of Buddhism. It was from here that Buddhism spread towards east as far away as Japan and Korea.

So how Iranian scientists and philosophers have been labelled as "Arab" findings is how you have claimed Pakistani discoveries as Indian.
 
From the same article I posted above.

Almost 200 years ago, a French scholar named Vivien de Saint-Martin, too, argued that all the streams that flow from the west to the east, the Ghaggar, the Markanda, the Dangri, the Sarsuti and the Chautang unite in a single bed which is the Rig Veda’s Sarasvati.

Marc Aurel Stein, another archaeologist who came to India in the late 1880s, postulated that the easternmost tributary of the Ghaggar was still known as the Sarsuti, a corruption of ‘Sarasvati’.

Almost 200 years ago is important part, science has come a long way since then. Now we don't need religious scriptures and biased archaeologists to prove anything. Seriously PNAS is respected international institute, and the research was done in last year and not 200 years ago. Lets quote updated sources shall we?

Ghaggar-Hakra was important part of Harappa and it was mostly in Pakistan anyway and rest in Indian punjab. And no Pakistani deny that Indian punjabis share similar heritage and culture with Pakistan punjab but not rest of 97% Indian population. But was Ghaggar-Hakra the mythical sarasvati river? Not really if one goes by description of Sarasvati river in RV.
 
Gandhara is the region that now comprise of Peshawar valley, Mardan, Swat, Dir, Malakand, and Bajuaur agencies in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Taxila in the Punjab, and up to Jalalabad in Afghanistan. It is in this region that the Gandhara civilization emerged and became the cradle of Buddhism. It was from here that Buddhism spread towards east as far away as Japan and Korea.

Gandhara has important place in our civilization, people there were once Hindus and Great Chanakya was associated with Taxila University who saved your land from the Greeks onslaught.
 
Ghaggar-Hakra was important part of Harappa and it was mostly in Pakistan anyway and rest in Indian punjab. And no Pakistani deny that Indian punjabis share similar heritage and culture with Pakistan punjab but not rest of 97% Indian population. But was Ghaggar-Hakra the mythical sarasvati river? Not really if one goes by description of Sarasvati river in RV.

All people from Kashmir to Tamil Nadu has shared a same civilization under the name of the country called 'Bharat' since ancient time and most of the modern Indians are descendants of the same people.

There was no third civilization in between the Indian and Iranian civilization in any ancient historical records.
 
@shan @Menace2Society
indians always spread false history :rofl:

inke to history he apni hoty he :cuckoo::cuckoo:

Only a single question ... If you dnt even have your own language to speak then how can you claim for history that not belongs to you???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@shan @Menace2Society
indians always spread false history :rofl:

inke to history he apni hoty he :cuckoo::cuckoo:

Always.

What they can't get their heads round is Pakistani Melehha people spread the first civilization in the sub continent whilst Indians were in jungles pretending to be monkeys.

There is no such thing as India, it is a word created by British Empire to label everyone in the sub continent.

They got this name from the Arabs and Iranians who described Pakistanis as Sindh and Hind. They are describing the Indus Valley Civilization, not India.

Therefore there is no such thing as "Ancient India" as Indian civilization came much later on than Pakistani civilization.

Through history when the people of the world have referred to the sub continent they are referring to the dwellers in the Indus Valley which is Pakistanis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ghaggar-Hakra was important part of Harappa and it was mostly in Pakistan anyway and rest in Indian punjab. And no Pakistani deny that Indian punjabis share similar heritage and culture with Pakistan punjab but not rest of 97% Indian population. But was Ghaggar-Hakra the mythical sarasvati river? Not really if one goes by description of Sarasvati river in RV.

Why is Punjabi called Indo-Aryan language and why are Punjabi people referred as indic people. :cuckoo: Pakistan is not just Punjab, you are forgetting Sindhi and Muhajirs.

What similarity does a Pashtun share with a Sindhi.
 
All people from Kashmir to Tamil Nadu has shared a same civilization under the name of the country called 'Bharat' since ancient time and most of the modern Indians are descendants of the same people.

There was no third civilization in between the Indian and Iranian civilization in any ancient historical records.

Again you can believe anything, thats not the point. If it really was one civilization and same people then Tara Singh would have let Ambedkar and his Dalit followers to convert to Sikhsim to increase numbers. But he didn't like the idea of non-Punjabis dominating sikh religion. There were two civilizations, our is based on Indus and yours Ganges.
 
Pakistan existed before you had any civilization at all.

India is a British word given to us all by the British because of their ignorance. India through history is just a collective landmass of the sub continent. There is no such thing as a single entity India before 1947.

There is no such thing as India or Ancient India. "Ancient India" is the Indus Valley civilization which is Pakistan.

There was no Republic of India before 1947 as well. Before 47 it was British India. Before British India it was Muslim India and before Muslim India there was no India.
yeah of course, guess ashoka was a muslim too
IndiaMauryaEmpire.jpg

just look how Ashoka's empire covered whole of modern day pakistan and also most of modern day india . :lol:
 
yeah of course, guess ashoka was a muslim too
IndiaMauryaEmpire.jpg

just look how Ashoka's empire covered whole of modern day pakistan and also most of modern day india . :lol:

Mauryans invaded modern day Pakistan towards the end of the Indus Valley Civilization.

This is after the Indus Valley civilization. :hitwall::hitwall:

The empire was called the Mauryan Empire, not Indian empire. :hitwall:
 

Back
Top Bottom