What's new

Here is the response of "Let's Burry The Past" From Indian Army Chief

It is a racist post when a Punjabi warrior was the one who not only captured a Pushtun land forever but also made sure that no thug ever tries his adventure in Punjab. The only fault of Punjabis is that they are accommodating and don't go after titles/posts.

Lolz seems u got offended,didnt mean to. U called pashtun warriors as thugs and a sikh as ur warrior 😂. That is why u also never feel ashamed for fighting as slave army for the brits and spilling blood of muslims for the white master. Can u also point to which land they took "forever"?
 
Lolz seems u got offended,didnt mean to. U called pashtun warriors as thugs and a sikh as ur warrior 😂. That is why u also never feel ashamed for fighting as slave army for the brits and spilling blood of muslims for the white master. Can u also point to which land they took "forever"?
Apprantly, your idea of ethnicity is based on religion only so you don't know that a sikh is son of soil (Maharaja Ranjeet Singh) and he took KPK forever. And now lar o bar Afghan can cry all they want.

Anyone attacking from a foreign land to native lands is called a thug but for slaves who love slavery, the invaders become their masters.
Also about joining brits and killing others,

download.gif
 
Last edited:
Apprantly, your idea of ethnicity is based on religion only so you don't know that a sikh is son of soil (Maharaja Ranjeet Singh) and he took KPK forever. And now lar o bar Afghan can cry all they want.

Anyone attacking from a foreign land to native lands is called a thug but for slaves who love slavery, the invaders become their masters.

Well frankly to us, religion is more important than ethnicity and if someone of same ethnicity is with a different religion, we see them as outsiders. So its kind of ethno religious combination.
Now how did he take KPK forever when there is not even 1℅ sikhs?? The sikhs mostly fought for their lands as lahore was taken multiple times by pashtuns and even amritsar was destroyed.

Your last paragraph summarizes it well. So this is the reason we see brits and even mughals as thugs but u happily served the brits and accepted them as masters, served them and upto some extent still their loyal servant. Weird how u see muslims as thugs but sikhas and brits as ur masters. But again u explained the mentality of slaves so cant do much with slaves. Still same slave mentality ppl are our military and govt leaders, what can we expect from them other than "foeget the past and move on" type comments.
 
Well frankly to us, religion is more important than ethnicity and if someone of same ethnicity is with a different religion, we see them as outsiders. So its kind of ethno religious combination.
Now how did he take KPK forever when there is not even 1℅ sikhs?? The sikhs mostly fought for their lands as lahore was taken multiple times by pashtuns and even amritsar was destroyed.

Your last paragraph summarizes it well. So this is the reason we see brits and even mughals as thugs but u happily served the brits and accepted them as masters, served them and upto some extent still their loyal servant. Weird how u see muslims as thugs but sikhas and brits as ur masters. But again u explained the mentality of slaves so cant do much with slaves. Still same slave mentality ppl are our military and govt leaders, what can we expect from them other than "foeget the past and move on" type comments.
Haha triggered? Ask Afghans and the looters who went after them and how. And do tell who gets more aid from Brits and Americans, you will know the truth. Punjab was invaded when Punjabis were not the leaders, whenever a Punjabi became a leader they stopped Alexandar and the thugs from Afghanistan. Do tell me about 40 Pathans and Trans frontier force while we are at who is slave and who is not...
 
I usually dont believe in ethnicities but our army and its top tier is mostly punjabi and we all know our punjabi brothers are not much fond of fighting. If the top tier of military were pashtun and balochs, ud see a totally different army. We need an army lead by pashtuns and baloch, the warrior people who are not afraid of war or death. History is something to learn from.

I love all our ethnicites and I only hope to remove this province nonsense and move away from ethnic based politics, its a curse and this mindset is uncivilized.
 
Haha triggered? Ask Afghans and the looters who went after them and how. And do tell who gets more aid from Brits and Americans, you will know the truth. Punjab was invaded when Punjabis were not the leaders, whenever a Punjabi became a leader they stopped Alexandar and the thugs from Afghanistan. Do tell me about 40 Pathans and Trans frontier force while we are at who is slave and who is not...

No bro i dnt get triggered so easily. Also seems u dont know much, lar o bar Afghan is an Afghanistan propaganda after partition, pashtuns of east have always been separate from Afghanistan after ahmed shah abdali. There have been wars between pashtuns of current Pakistan and Afghanistan. These wars took place in bajaur, dir. So ur assertion that whoever talks of pashtuns are Afghanistan supporters is wrong, that one idiot even mentioned ANA to me lolz. Let me tell u, if pashtuns of Pakistan wanted to be part of Afghanistan then no punjabi, sindhi, sikh, Christian or brit could have stopped us, it was wish of pashtuns to stay away from Afghanistan. The relations were poisoned especially after Afghanistan struck a deal with brits and let the pashtuns of Pakistan alone to face the brits. We still kept fighting till 1947.
Am not surprised to see u using same language as indians. Read history and ull know who are slaves. Pashtun lodhis ruled india before mughals. We didn't even accept mughals as rulers n kept fighting. Remember that famous birbal? Well he was killed in a war with pashtuns. We didnt accept Turkics, whom u proudly wave as ur ancestors but actually made u slaves. We didnt accept the brits, n kept fighting, remember why churchil was posted here?? From Britain to USSR to US, u should have some idea abt who easily becomes slave and who fights forever.
As far as aid from US and britain is concerned, i have no idea and dont care. Ur thinking that am an Afghanistan supporter is wrong n shows how little u know. Maybe Afghanistan puppet govt got more aid but Pakistan unpuppit govt got got something too right? Billions of dollars flowing in mush era. Or was that halal aid?
 
I don't think there is any point of burying the past we will have to Bury their future as well

Destroy their world reputation and take all their trade. Its a simple formula. Dancing with the devil will not give you glory.
 
No bro i dnt get triggered so easily. Also seems u dont know much, lar o bar Afghan is an Afghanistan propaganda after partition, pashtuns of east have always been separate from Afghanistan after ahmed shah abdali. There have been wars between pashtuns of current Pakistan and Afghanistan. These wars took place in bajaur, dir. So ur assertion that whoever talks of pashtuns are Afghanistan supporters is wrong, that one idiot even mentioned ANA to me lolz. Let me tell u, if pashtuns of Pakistan wanted to be part of Afghanistan then no punjabi, sindhi, sikh, Christian or brit could have stopped us, it was wish of pashtuns to stay away from Afghanistan. The relations were poisoned especially after Afghanistan struck a deal with brits and let the pashtuns of Pakistan alone to face the brits. We still kept fighting till 1947.
Am not surprised to see u using same language as indians. Read history and ull know who are slaves. Pashtun lodhis ruled india before mughals. We didn't even accept mughals as rulers n kept fighting. Remember that famous birbal? Well he was killed in a war with pashtuns. We didnt accept Turkics, whom u proudly wave as ur ancestors but actually made u slaves. We didnt accept the brits, n kept fighting, remember why churchil was posted here?? From Britain to USSR to US, u should have some idea abt who easily becomes slave and who fights forever.
As far as aid from US and britain is concerned, i have no idea and dont care. Ur thinking that am an Afghanistan supporter is wrong n shows how little u know. Maybe Afghanistan puppet govt got more aid but Pakistan unpuppit govt got got something too right? Billions of dollars flowing in mush era. Or was that halal aid?
1 - Faqir of IPI tried a stunt to join with Afghanistan and we all know what happened to that.
2 - Afghans have not accepted Durand line and there are lar o bar supporters in KPK and FATA and we all know how that is working for such people.

I am not sure how you believe that Pushtuns are the warrior race and Punjabis are not while in the same breadth you guys whine about Punjabi domination. I am not an ethnic Punjabi however i have no delusions about any ethnicity of Pakistan. You rooted out Turks and others, we can say the same about Pushtuns and Brits later on. Such stereotypes that one race is superior than other is all hogwash.
 
No bro i dnt get triggered so easily. Also seems u dont know much, lar o bar Afghan is an Afghanistan propaganda after partition, pashtuns of east have always been separate from Afghanistan after ahmed shah abdali. There have been wars between pashtuns of current Pakistan and Afghanistan. These wars took place in bajaur, dir. So ur assertion that whoever talks of pashtuns are Afghanistan supporters is wrong, that one idiot even mentioned ANA to me lolz. Let me tell u, if pashtuns of Pakistan wanted to be part of Afghanistan then no punjabi, sindhi, sikh, Christian or brit could have stopped us, it was wish of pashtuns to stay away from Afghanistan. The relations were poisoned especially after Afghanistan struck a deal with brits and let the pashtuns of Pakistan alone to face the brits. We still kept fighting till 1947.
Am not surprised to see u using same language as indians. Read history and ull know who are slaves. Pashtun lodhis ruled india before mughals. We didn't even accept mughals as rulers n kept fighting. Remember that famous birbal? Well he was killed in a war with pashtuns. We didnt accept Turkics, whom u proudly wave as ur ancestors but actually made u slaves. We didnt accept the brits, n kept fighting, remember why churchil was posted here?? From Britain to USSR to US, u should have some idea abt who easily becomes slave and who fights forever.
As far as aid from US and britain is concerned, i have no idea and dont care. Ur thinking that am an Afghanistan supporter is wrong n shows how little u know. Maybe Afghanistan puppet govt got more aid but Pakistan unpuppit govt got got something too right? Billions of dollars flowing in mush era. Or was that halal aid?

Waffling about the past when people lived in huts and fought with swords. Doesn't require much intelligence thats why ghenghis invaded everything.

This is the age of intelligence, organised intelligence and the ability to recognise multi dimensional 5th gen subversion which all the communities bordering Afghanistan do not understand. Its a mob and are easily manipulated. Who allowed TTP fighters in? Who gave them a place in their home to hide? It was a simple trick of drugs, subliminals, religion and simple propaganda which managed to dupe everyone. Its stupidity so please you have no clue.

A nation state requires brutal nationalism and the eye to see it all, all the games all the BS. Some of us have some of us don't but its okay we will bring them all up to speed.
 
No bro i dnt get triggered so easily. Also seems u dont know much, lar o bar Afghan is an Afghanistan propaganda after partition, pashtuns of east have always been separate from Afghanistan after ahmed shah abdali. There have been wars between pashtuns of current Pakistan and Afghanistan. These wars took place in bajaur, dir. So ur assertion that whoever talks of pashtuns are Afghanistan supporters is wrong, that one idiot even mentioned ANA to me lolz. Let me tell u, if pashtuns of Pakistan wanted to be part of Afghanistan then no punjabi, sindhi, sikh, Christian or brit could have stopped us, it was wish of pashtuns to stay away from Afghanistan. The relations were poisoned especially after Afghanistan struck a deal with brits and let the pashtuns of Pakistan alone to face the brits. We still kept fighting till 1947.
Am not surprised to see u using same language as indians. Read history and ull know who are slaves. Pashtun lodhis ruled india before mughals. We didn't even accept mughals as rulers n kept fighting. Remember that famous birbal? Well he was killed in a war with pashtuns. We didnt accept Turkics, whom u proudly wave as ur ancestors but actually made u slaves. We didnt accept the brits, n kept fighting, remember why churchil was posted here?? From Britain to USSR to US, u should have some idea abt who easily becomes slave and who fights forever.
As far as aid from US and britain is concerned, i have no idea and dont care. Ur thinking that am an Afghanistan supporter is wrong n shows how little u know. Maybe Afghanistan puppet govt got more aid but Pakistan unpuppit govt got got something too right? Billions of dollars flowing in mush era. Or was that halal aid?

Pashtuns of Pakistan are Pakistanis who willingly joined Pakistan. There is no debate here brother.

No one in the right mind would glorify sikhs against our pashtuns brethren. Never. No intention to cause offence. apologies in advance.

1 - Faqir of IPI tried a stunt to join with Afghanistan and we all know what happened to that.
2 - Afghans have not accepted Durand line and there are lar o bar supporters in KPK and FATA and we all know how that is working for such people.

I am not sure how you believe that Pushtuns are the warrior race and Punjabis are not while in the same breadth you guys whine about Punjabi domination. I am not an ethnic Punjabi however i have no delusions about any ethnicity of Pakistan. You rooted out Turks and others, we can say the same about Pushtuns and Brits later on. Such stereotypes that one race is superior than other is all hogwash.

Please brother, this is a useless debate. What our brother is perhaps trying to say is that some elements in Pakistan army are just intellectually bankrupt and are have lost the valor once they had.

Many of us are disappointed with the present military leadership. There is nothing wrong with.

I apologize if u find this offensive.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom