What's new

Who will benefit the most from the RCEP?

Viva_Viet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
7,503
Reaction score
-6
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Viet Nam
What is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)?

After eight years of grueling negotiations, 15 economies in Asia inked the world’s biggest free trade agreement (FTA) this month. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP for short, was signed on November 5th by China, Japan, South Korea, the ASEAN-10 (Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines and Vietnam), as well as Australia and New Zealand. Together, these economies account for $26 trillion in GDP and 2.26 billion in population, roughly one third of the global total. Trade amongst signatories amounted to over $10 trillion in 2019, roughly 27% of global trade. Amidst a pandemic-induced global slowdown and concerns about ‘de-globalization’, the deal will help to sustain regional trade and economic growth.

From a geopolitical perspective, it signals a move towards a more China-centric trade order in Asia and sends a strong message that Asia is willing to move ahead with further trade liberalization in the absence of the U.S. At this moment, nine out of the 15 members still need to ratify the deal within their respective domestic legal contexts before it can take effect.
placeholder-default.svg


View info
Why this deal matters

The deal will provide a modest boost to regional trade and income growth over time. According to the Peterson Institute of International Economics (PIIE), RCEP will add $186 billion to the world economy and 0.2% to its members’ GDP on a permanent basis. The same analysis also points out that the global income benefits of RCEP will compensate for two-thirds of the income losses caused by the U.S.-China trade war. Assuming the current U.S.–China trade restrictions are not removed, the economic benefits of RCEP will be 70% larger than the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). So how are the gains distributed? In absolute terms, China, Japan and Korea will see the largest estimated income gains of $85 billion, $48 billion and $23 billion, respectively.

But as a share of national GDP, certain ASEAN economies, particularly Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines are also key beneficiaries (see chart 2). Much has been said about India’s decision to pull out last year, reportedly over concerns about the impact on domestic manufacturing and dairy industries1. By not joining, India stands to see a modest loss of around -$6 billion (or- 0.01% of GDP), alongside Taiwan (-$3 billion or -0.4% of GDP), from shifting trade patterns in the region.
Chart2_11.23.2020.jpg


View info
From a sector perspective, manufacturing, particularly electronics, industrial machinery, and autos, will be the biggest winners from the RCEP. The signatories of RCEP have committed to lower their tariffs to 0% within 10 years, for more than 90% of their products. While some products are still left out, such as certain agricultural products, manufacturing goods are generally included. Although Asia already has several FTAs in place (for example, between China and ASEAN and between Japan and ASEAN), there is no trade agreement linking China, Japan, and Korea.

Extending the coverage will help to boost the regional manufacturing supply chain, which increasingly features all three blocs—with Japan and Korea on the highest positions, China in the middle, and ASEAN occupying a mix of middle-to-lower positions on the technology value chain. In addition, it is common for companies with global supply chains to face tariffs within a free trade zone if their products contain components made elsewhere, because of restrictions around ‘rules of origin’. Apart from extending the coverage of the tariff free treatment, RCEP also uses a more flexible and cumulative approach to ‘rule of origin’. This helps to better realize the effect of tariff reductions.

What does all this mean for investors?

The broader manufacturing supply chain is a clear winner in the RCEP deal. Companies with existing supply chains that fall within the RCEP realm will likely see a reduction of tariff rates. The eventual establishment of a tariff-free Asia supply chain will also alleviate pressures faced by companies who are currently caught between the U.S.–China trade war.

In time, these companies will have opportunities to restructure their supply chains. Sectors like electronics, industrial equipment, and autos will likely see the most benefit. In the equity space, RCEP strengthens our convictions in cyclical sectors, such as industrials, in our preferred markets, including China and South Korea.

Lastly, we continue to like Chinese central government bonds (CGBs) due to their attractive carry and low volatility, as well as the RMB against an overall softer U.S. dollar backdrop.

.
 
What is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)?

After eight years of grueling negotiations, 15 economies in Asia inked the world’s biggest free trade agreement (FTA) this month. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP for short, was signed on November 5th by China, Japan, South Korea, the ASEAN-10 (Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines and Vietnam), as well as Australia and New Zealand. Together, these economies account for $26 trillion in GDP and 2.26 billion in population, roughly one third of the global total. Trade amongst signatories amounted to over $10 trillion in 2019, roughly 27% of global trade. Amidst a pandemic-induced global slowdown and concerns about ‘de-globalization’, the deal will help to sustain regional trade and economic growth.

From a geopolitical perspective, it signals a move towards a more China-centric trade order in Asia and sends a strong message that Asia is willing to move ahead with further trade liberalization in the absence of the U.S. At this moment, nine out of the 15 members still need to ratify the deal within their respective domestic legal contexts before it can take effect.
placeholder-default.svg


View info
Why this deal matters

The deal will provide a modest boost to regional trade and income growth over time. According to the Peterson Institute of International Economics (PIIE), RCEP will add $186 billion to the world economy and 0.2% to its members’ GDP on a permanent basis. The same analysis also points out that the global income benefits of RCEP will compensate for two-thirds of the income losses caused by the U.S.-China trade war. Assuming the current U.S.–China trade restrictions are not removed, the economic benefits of RCEP will be 70% larger than the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). So how are the gains distributed? In absolute terms, China, Japan and Korea will see the largest estimated income gains of $85 billion, $48 billion and $23 billion, respectively.

But as a share of national GDP, certain ASEAN economies, particularly Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines are also key beneficiaries (see chart 2). Much has been said about India’s decision to pull out last year, reportedly over concerns about the impact on domestic manufacturing and dairy industries1. By not joining, India stands to see a modest loss of around -$6 billion (or- 0.01% of GDP), alongside Taiwan (-$3 billion or -0.4% of GDP), from shifting trade patterns in the region.
View attachment 691159

View info
From a sector perspective, manufacturing, particularly electronics, industrial machinery, and autos, will be the biggest winners from the RCEP. The signatories of RCEP have committed to lower their tariffs to 0% within 10 years, for more than 90% of their products. While some products are still left out, such as certain agricultural products, manufacturing goods are generally included. Although Asia already has several FTAs in place (for example, between China and ASEAN and between Japan and ASEAN), there is no trade agreement linking China, Japan, and Korea.

Extending the coverage will help to boost the regional manufacturing supply chain, which increasingly features all three blocs—with Japan and Korea on the highest positions, China in the middle, and ASEAN occupying a mix of middle-to-lower positions on the technology value chain. In addition, it is common for companies with global supply chains to face tariffs within a free trade zone if their products contain components made elsewhere, because of restrictions around ‘rules of origin’. Apart from extending the coverage of the tariff free treatment, RCEP also uses a more flexible and cumulative approach to ‘rule of origin’. This helps to better realize the effect of tariff reductions.

What does all this mean for investors?

The broader manufacturing supply chain is a clear winner in the RCEP deal. Companies with existing supply chains that fall within the RCEP realm will likely see a reduction of tariff rates. The eventual establishment of a tariff-free Asia supply chain will also alleviate pressures faced by companies who are currently caught between the U.S.–China trade war.

In time, these companies will have opportunities to restructure their supply chains. Sectors like electronics, industrial equipment, and autos will likely see the most benefit. In the equity space, RCEP strengthens our convictions in cyclical sectors, such as industrials, in our preferred markets, including China and South Korea.

Lastly, we continue to like Chinese central government bonds (CGBs) due to their attractive carry and low volatility, as well as the RMB against an overall softer U.S. dollar backdrop.

.

Nice article, we will see what will be the case now after the signing.
 
Chart2_11.23.2020.jpg


Its easy to understand why JP-SK got biggest benefit cos they can sell more cars, phones, electronic stuff etc .

Dont know why Malay got.more benefit than VN while most of factories leaving CN come to VN, not Malay ( Samsung, LG Foxconn Luxshare, Panasonic, shoes, tire-auto part etc )

For CN, exactly like what I said, its just a "spiritual victory " to make her look like a "Winner" against US who scrapped TPP. CN only get benefit from selling natural resources ( coal, rare earth ) and components to factories in VN while millions Jobs loss due factories left CN ( newest one is Foxconn)

For ID, @Indos bro can explain, right ??
 
View attachment 691170

Its easy to understand why JP-SK got biggest benefit cos they can sell more cars, phones, electronic stuff etc .

Dont know why Malay got.more benefit than VN while most of factories leaving CN come to VN, not Malay ( Samsung, LG Foxconn Luxshare, Panasonic, shoes, tire-auto part etc )

For CN, exactly like what I said, its just a "spiritual victory " to make her look like a "Winner" against US who scrapped TPP. CN only get benefit from selling natural resources ( coal, rare earth ) and components to factories in VN while millions Jobs loss due factories left CN ( newest one is Foxconn)

For ID, @Indos bro can explain, right ??

Malaysian have many Japanese and Taiwanese companies who produce electronics, thats where they think Malaysia will be among the most benefit nations in RCEP.

I dont know why they put Indonesia as among the lease country to get benefit, but most probably by seeing those industries that currently exist and use ceteris paribus while doing the calculation.

Actually I am quite optimist about Indonesia, particularly after we have Omnibus Law and our Anti Corruption Body (KPK) performance so far. This is where other important variables that is related to regulation can possibly make Indonesia get more benefit from the RCEP, particularly in term of FDI increase and small and medium size enterprises growth.

We also tend to produce better leader for time to time. Next Indonesian President I think and hope is Ridwan Kamil, current West Java Governor.

1606356296035.png

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest available country-specific data shows that 77.3% of products exported from Malaysia were bought by importers in: China (14.2% of the global total), Singapore (13.9%), United States (9.7%), Hong Kong (6.7%), Japan (6.6%), Thailand (5.7%), India (3.8%), Taiwan (3.7%), Vietnam (3.5%), South Korea (3.4%), Indonesia (3.1%) and Australia (2.9%).

From a continental perspective, 72.3% of Malaysia exports by value were delivered to Asian countries while 11% were sold to North American importers. Malaysia shipped another 10.4% worth of goods to Europe. Smaller percentages went to Oceania (3.6%) led by Australia and New Zealand, Africa (1.9%) then Latin America (0.8%) excluding Mexico but including the Caribbean.

Given Malaysia’s population of 32.8 million people, its total $238.1 billion in 2019 exports translates to roughly $7,300 for every resident in the Southeast Asian country.


Malaysia’s Top 10 Exports


The following export product groups represent the highest dollar value in Malaysian global shipments during 2019. Also shown is the percentage share each export category represents in terms of overall exports from Malaysia.


  1. Electrical machinery, equipment: US$82 billion (34.4% of total exports)
  2. Mineral fuels including oil: $34.5 billion (14.5%)
  3. Machinery including computers: $21.8 billion (9.1%)
  4. Animal/vegetable fats, oils, waxes: $11.5 billion (4.8%)
  5. Optical, technical, medical apparatus: $10.1 billion (4.2%)
  6. Plastics, plastic articles: $9.6 billion (4%)
  7. Rubber, rubber articles: $7.1 billion (3%)
  8. Iron, steel: $4.4 billion (1.8%)
  9. Other chemical goods: $4.1 billion (1.7%)
  10. Organic chemicals: $4 billion (1.7%)

Malaysia’s top 10 exports accounted for almost four-fifths (79.4%) of the overall value of its global shipments.
 
Malaysian have many Japanese and Taiwanese companies who produce electronics, thats where they think Malaysia will be among the most benefit nations in RCEP.

I dont know why they put Indonesia as among the lease country to get benefit, but most probably by seeing those industries that currently exist and use ceteris paribus while doing the calculation.

Actually I am quite optimist about Indonesia, particularly after we have Omnibus Law and our Anti Corruption Body (KPK) performance so far. This is where other important variables that is related to regulation can possibly make Indonesia get more benefit from the RCEP, particularly in term of FDI increase and small and medium size enterprises growth.

We also tend to produce better leader for time to time. Next Indonesian President I think and hope is Ridwan Kamil, current West Java Governor.

View attachment 691182
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest available country-specific data shows that 77.3% of products exported from Malaysia were bought by importers in: China (14.2% of the global total), Singapore (13.9%), United States (9.7%), Hong Kong (6.7%), Japan (6.6%), Thailand (5.7%), India (3.8%), Taiwan (3.7%), Vietnam (3.5%), South Korea (3.4%), Indonesia (3.1%) and Australia (2.9%).

From a continental perspective, 72.3% of Malaysia exports by value were delivered to Asian countries while 11% were sold to North American importers. Malaysia shipped another 10.4% worth of goods to Europe. Smaller percentages went to Oceania (3.6%) led by Australia and New Zealand, Africa (1.9%) then Latin America (0.8%) excluding Mexico but including the Caribbean.

Given Malaysia’s population of 32.8 million people, its total $238.1 billion in 2019 exports translates to roughly $7,300 for every resident in the Southeast Asian country.


Malaysia’s Top 10 Exports


The following export product groups represent the highest dollar value in Malaysian global shipments during 2019. Also shown is the percentage share each export category represents in terms of overall exports from Malaysia.


  1. Electrical machinery, equipment: US$82 billion (34.4% of total exports)
  2. Mineral fuels including oil: $34.5 billion (14.5%)
  3. Machinery including computers: $21.8 billion (9.1%)
  4. Animal/vegetable fats, oils, waxes: $11.5 billion (4.8%)
  5. Optical, technical, medical apparatus: $10.1 billion (4.2%)
  6. Plastics, plastic articles: $9.6 billion (4%)
  7. Rubber, rubber articles: $7.1 billion (3%)
  8. Iron, steel: $4.4 billion (1.8%)
  9. Other chemical goods: $4.1 billion (1.7%)
  10. Organic chemicals: $4 billion (1.7%)

Malaysia’s top 10 exports accounted for almost four-fifths (79.4%) of the overall value of its global shipments.
Tks,I got it. But Malaysia use migrant workers, and Covid surely hit their factories hard when the workers cant go back to Malaysia .

Investors cant earn more profit from Malaysia's factories when many factories there must close during Covid while vnd ones still open 24/24 till now.

Just like SG, using too many migrant workers, thats why her economy got hit hard and got a little benefit from RCEP.

------

  • Researchers said Malaysia has done little to protect low-wage migrant workers from the effects of the coronavirus pandemic — which could hurt an economy that's struggling to recover from the virus.
  • Migrant workers are an important part of Malaysia's economy and failing to protect their jobs would affect "the survival of industries and businesses," said Tan Theng Theng, an independent researcher.
  • Malaysia is home to at least two million migrant workers, who comprise around 15% of the total workforce, said Jarud Romadan, a researcher at Khazanah Research Institute.
 
Tks,I got it. But Malaysia use migrant workers, and Covid surely hit their factories hard when the workers cant go back to Malaysia .

Investors cant earn more profit from Malaysia's factories when many factories there must close during Covid while vnd ones still open 24/24 till now.

Just like SG, using too many migrant workers, thats why her economy got hit hard and got a little benefit from RCEP.

------

  • Researchers said Malaysia has done little to protect low-wage migrant workers from the effects of the coronavirus pandemic — which could hurt an economy that's struggling to recover from the virus.
  • Migrant workers are an important part of Malaysia's economy and failing to protect their jobs would affect "the survival of industries and businesses," said Tan Theng Theng, an independent researcher.
  • Malaysia is home to at least two million migrant workers, who comprise around 15% of the total workforce, said Jarud Romadan, a researcher at Khazanah Research Institute.

Well, I really dont know about Malaysia, I dont read about their economy much, just a snapshot, but yes, they rely so much on immigrant workers. It is where they can still be competitive. Their economy has rebounded in the third quarter and posted around 2 percent negative growth, much improvement than minus 17 percent growth they had in second quarter due to lock down effect.

IMO As long as they still can get huge low wage workers from their surrounding countries, they will likely to be just fine. Despite so, countries with huge population like Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippine I think will have more appeal among foreign investors than smaller population nations for investment location, this is also one of the reason of why both China and India can get high growth since 2000 where market liberation take effect.
 
View attachment 691170

Its easy to understand why JP-SK got biggest benefit cos they can sell more cars, phones, electronic stuff etc .

Dont know why Malay got.more benefit than VN while most of factories leaving CN come to VN, not Malay ( Samsung, LG Foxconn Luxshare, Panasonic, shoes, tire-auto part etc )

For CN, exactly like what I said, its just a "spiritual victory " to make her look like a "Winner" against US who scrapped TPP. CN only get benefit from selling natural resources ( coal, rare earth ) and components to factories in VN while millions Jobs loss due factories left CN ( newest one is Foxconn)

For ID, @Indos bro can explain, right ??

You may see benefit in relative or absolute terms, as well as in direct and indirect forms. In a trade agreement, there may be political gains, as well as economic ones.

A trade agreement may spur other pending agreements, such as CN-JP-SK.

Like the article points out, in relative terms, normally, smaller countries will get the most benefit, while, in absolute terms, it should be larger GDPs.

We also need to wait and see how much of trade in services liberation this agreement will promote because, trade in goods, East Asia already is quite opened-up through various FTA schemes.

I think RCEP made CPTPP obselete now because, RCEP is open regionalism. RCEP also made it especially very difficult for an anti-China TPP to be formed.

In general, to be in a trade regime is better than not to be in it although it may require lots of domestic homework and bitter medicine. I guess India pulled out of it because India's powerful business classes were not willing to disturb their established interest mechanisms.
 
You may see benefit in relative or absolute terms, as well as in direct and indirect forms. In a trade agreement, there may be political gains, as well as economic ones.

A trade agreement may spur other pending agreements, such as CN-JP-SK.

Like the article points out, in relative terms, normally, smaller countries will get the most benefit, while, in absolute terms, it should be larger GDPs.

We also need to wait and see how much of trade in services liberation this agreement will promote because, trade in goods, East Asia already is quite opened-up through various FTA schemes.

I think RCEP made CPTPP obselete now because, RCEP is open regionalism. RCEP also made it especially very difficult for an anti-China TPP to be formed.

In general, to be in a trade regime is better than not to be in it although it may require lots of domestic homework and bitter medicine. I guess India pulled out of it because India's powerful business classes were not willing to disturb their established interest mechanisms.
But u have almost Nothing good that another RCEP nations need except raw materials, components and rare earth while Huawei, Hikvision still got ban.

SK -JP have many good stuff to sell (car,phone, electronic stuff) and VN also got big benefit bcs their factories r in VN. CN only can sell raw materials, rare earth, thats why your benefit from RCEP is quite small like it is showed on the chart.
Chart2_11.23.2020.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom