What's new

Rajnath Singh says can't guarantee full resolution of intrusions

Feng Leng

BANNED
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,355
Reaction score
-21
Country
China
Location
China
Rajnath Singh says can't guarantee full resolution of intrusions
It is in our character not to hurt the self-esteem of any other country. But, if anyone attempts to hurt India's self-esteem, we will on no account tolerate it and will respond forcefully," Singh said

Rajnath Singh | India China border row | Chinese incursion in Ladakh

Ajai Shukla | New Delhi Last Updated at July 18, 2020 00:56 IST

1595013567-7258.jpg

Amplifying the defence minister’s warning was the location where it was delivered: Lukung is just 40 kilometres from Finger 4, where Chinese and Indian soldiers clashed violently in early May and continue facing off.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, on a two-day visit to Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, is the first senior leader to signal that China might not agree to fully resolve the crisis in Ladakh and that, in that event, India would not hesitate to use force.

Addressing soldiers at Lukung, on the shore of the scenic Pangong Tso that is at the centre of the ongoing Sino-Indian crisis, Singh warned: “Based on the progress of (Sino-Indian) talks so far, the situation should be resolved. But, to what extent it will be resolved, I cannot guarantee. However, I can assure you that no power on earth can touch, or capture, even an inch of Indian territory."


In an unvarnished warning to China, the defence minister went on: “We want peace, not conflict. It is in our character not to hurt the self-esteem of any other country. But, if anyone attempts to hurt India’s self-esteem, we will on no account tolerate it and will respond forcefully.”

Amplifying the defence minister’s warning was the location where it was delivered: Lukung is just 40 kilometres from Finger 4, where Chinese and Indian soldiers clashed violently in early May and continue facing off.

Before his visit, Singh tweeted that he would be “visiting the forward areas to review the situation at the borders and also interact with the armed forces personnel deployed in the region.”

Singh is visiting at a time when there is limited progress on disengaging Indian and Chinese troops in three of the five areas where tension has run high after People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops crossed the traditional Line of Actual Control (LAC) that has existed since the ceasefire of 1962.

This follows a 14-hour meeting on Tuesday, in which senior Indian and Chinese military commanders discussed troop disengagement in the Galwan River valley (at Patrolling Point 14, or PP-14), the Hot Spring-Gogra sector (PP-15 and 17A) and the Pangong Tso (Finger 4).


The only sector where disengagement is complete is in the Galwan valley. As Business Standard reported on July 9, (Withdrawal from Galwan Valley puts Indian troops further from LAC) the terms of disengagement have shifted the LAC here by one kilometre into Indian territory, benefiting China. The traditional LAC, which ran along PP-14, now effectively runs through the Y-nullah junction.

There has also been some disengagement this week in the Hot Spring-Gogra areas. Near PP-15, many of the 1,000 PLA troops that had intruded 3-4 kilometres across the LAC have disengaged and withdrawn, leaving a smaller number about one kilometre inside Indian-claimed territory.

At PP-17A too, many of the 1,500 Chinese soldiers who had intruded across the LAC have now withdrawn, but several hundred remain a kilometre or so inside Indian-claimed territory.


1595013981-3065.jpg













In the Pangong Tso north bank, most of the Indian and Chinese soldiers who had confronted each other at Finger 4 have now disengaged. The Chinese have pulled back to Finger 5, while Indian soldiers have pulled back to the so-called Dhan Singh Post, which is located between Fingers 3 and 2. The Indians are now more than 10 kilometres from Finger 8, which they patrolled till April, and have vacated the Indo-Tibetan Border Police administrative base near Finger 3.

Meanwhile, some of the Chinese troops that had built bunkers in the Green Tops area – the commanding heights north of the Pangong Tso – are thinning out.

However, in the Depsang sector to the north, there is no disengagement from the positions the PLA intruded into, 16-18 kilometres on the Indian side of the LAC. In this sector, Indian troops can no longer reach five patrolling points on the LAC – PP 10, 11, 11A, 12 and 13. The Chinese have flatly refused to discuss a pull back from Depsang in all four senior commanders’ meetings held so far.

Also unchanged is the heavy Chinese troop build-up on its side of the LAC. The army estimates there are 3,000-4,000 PLA soldiers across the LAC at Depsang, 3,000 opposite Galwan, 1,000 each opposite PP-15 and PP-17A, about 3,000 at Khurnak Fort, some 4,000 opposite the Pangong lake and another 4,000 opposite Demchok and Fukche. That adds up to about five PLA brigade groups.

Besides the pressure from the Indian troop build-up, military planners assess that the Chinese are now more open to disengaging and pulling back because they have succeeded in building a “no-man’s land” inside territory that had so far been under Indian control.

https://www.business-standard.com/a...-resolution-of-intrusions-120071800033_1.html



Let the military prove its worth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He is twisting the words. Stop following this fake guy.
Rajnath didn't say "he cannot guarantee that China will withdraw India's territory.... "

What a shameless guy he is.

@LeGenD Members here should be restricted to post fake and twisted speeches.
This is his full speech. Go to 5:10
 
Last edited:
Why hasn't this shameless guy resigned yet?

He is single-handedly responsible for soiling India's prestige and dragging it through mud in front of the whole world...

But come to think of it - probably no better choices available.

I feel sorry for Indian Jawans.....
 
So China has occupied 60 square kilometers of Indian territory before. That is 9.3E10 or 93 billion square inches of Indian territory ... and yet India says it will respond "if any country takes an inch of our territory." :rofl:
Prove that China has taken 60 sq km of Indian territory.
I measured the land between F4 LAC and F8 LAC in Pangong Lake and it turns out to be only a mere 8.4 sq km.
 
Modi and Rajnath keep saying that if anyone takes "One inch" of Indian territory, they would do this, do that.
Even in the above speech Rajnath repeated the mantra that no one can take 1 inch of Indian territory.

Here is a snap of what India has lost recently. Not to mention the liberated Kashmir and Aksai Chin.

upload_2020-7-18_6-46-46.png


It seems India has lost 30 Km of area to the Chinese recently.
Take that Modi.
But Godi media.............:agree::azn::rofl::rofl:

Before Indians cry here, it is from your own source.
https://www.business-standard.com/a...-resolution-of-intrusions-120071800033_1.html
 
Modi and Rajnath keep saying that if anyone takes "One inch" of Indian territory, they would do this, do that.

Here is a snap of what India has lost recently. Not to mention the liberated Kashmir and Aksai Chin.

View attachment 652029

It seems India has lost 30 Km of area to the Chinese recently.
Take that Modi.
But Godi media.............:agree::azn::rofl::rofl:
Lol.:rofl::rofl:
Source is Ajai Shukla who has been exposed as Congress agent by ex Army Chief VK Singh.
 
Moo-tor jawab is what the PAF would've given by shooting 9 Indian jets. It isn't surrendering 93,000,000,000 inches square of territory and saying you will retaliate to those who take 1 inch of land.
 
Prove that China has taken 60 sq km of Indian territory.
I measured the land between F4 LAC and F8 LAC in Pangong Lake and it turns out to be only a mere 8.4 sq km.
Denying the Chinese has even taken your territory will only embolden them to take even more :rofl:. Just like PM said, "there has been no Chinese intrusion into our borders." :partay:
 
Lol.:rofl::rofl:
Source is Ajai Shukla who has been exposed as Congress agent by ex Army Chief VK Singh.

Business Standard published it.
Why Indians do not prove him wrong!!

Secondly, if no territory lost.
Why there were negotiation for disengagement and China's let go of the territory!!:china:
 
Barking Dogs Never Bite.
 
@The BrOkEn HeArT

The opening post contain the original source as well as a tweet in relation.

That is fine.

I have cautioned members about opening a thread on the basis of a single tweet unless it is a solid source in itself.

The source should be verifiable to ensure quality.

You may quote the original post and offer a rebuttal and/or argument of your own. No issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom