What's new

Iranian links to Taliban

H. Dawary

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
565
Reaction score
-2
Country
Afghanistan
Location
Canada
  • Iranian Links: New Taliban Splinter Group Emerges That Opposes U.S. Peace Deal
    June 09, 2020 16:53 GMT
    BA800EFA-A84B-4B14-AE5D-03302C5533E8_w408_r1_s.jpg

    Taliban prisoners are released from an Afghan prison late last month as part of a U.S.-Taliban deal to achieve peace in the war-torn country. Progress on the agreement has stalled recently and now there are reports of possible divisions within the Taliban's ranks.
    60

  • SEE ALSO:
    The Taliban, The Government, And Islamic State: Who Controls What In Afghanistan?

    A new report by a United Nations monitoring team made public on June 1 said that "at least one group of senior Taliban" had "formed a new group in opposition to any possible peace agreement."

    The breakaway faction was "composed mainly of dissident senior Taliban members residing outside Afghanistan," said the report, which was based on information provided by Afghan and foreign intelligence and security services, think tanks, experts, and interlocutors.

    Iran Building Taliban 'Combat Capabilities'

    The Hezb-e Walayat-e Islami joins a growing list of Taliban factions that support continued fighting against Afghan and international troops.

    "There are several Taliban leaders, fronts, and commanders who oppose peace and are linked to Iran," said Giustozzi.

    Among them, he added, is Sirajuddin Haqqani, the deputy leader of the Taliban and the head of the Haqqani network, a powerful Taliban faction that is a U.S.-designated terrorist organization.

    That is despite Haqqani's op-ed in February in The New York Times, in which he voiced support for the peace deal with the United States.

    Haqqani, who is the Taliban's operational chief, has a $10 million U.S. bounty on his head. He is the son of the late radical Islamist leader Jalaluddin Haqqani, the founder of the Al-Qaeda-linked network blamed for some of Afghanistan's deadliest suicide attacks.

    1B9C12AE-07B5-4CD4-8427-114C56588747_w408_r1_s.jpg

    Jalaluddin Haqqani, the late founder of the militant Haqqani network.
    The Haqqani network has strong ties to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. But Giustozzi said the network is "getting closer" to Iran as Islamabad and Riyadh cut funding to it.

    Other Iran-linked Taliban leaders who oppose peace efforts include Mullah Qayum Zakir, a powerful battlefield commander and the former military chief of the Taliban until 2014. A former inmate in the infamous U.S. prison at Cuba's Guantanamo Bay, Mullah Zakir has the backing of hard-line field commanders.

    Mullah Zakir leads a conservative Taliban faction along with Ibrahim Sadr, the Taliban's former military commission chief. In October 2018, Sadr was among eight Taliban members designated global terrorists by the U.S. Treasury Department.

    "Iranian officials agreed to provide Ibrahim with monetary support and individualized training in order to prevent a possible tracing back to Iran," the Treasury Department said, adding that "Iranian trainers would help build Taliban tactical and combat capabilities."

    An Afghan intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the new splinter group included the followers of Sadr.

    The officials said the new group also includes members of the Feday-e Mahaz (Suicide Brigade) a small, hard-core offshoot of the mainstream Taliban.

    The group is believed to be led by Haji Najibullah, a loyalist to radical Taliban commander Mullah Dadullah, who was killed in a U.S.-led attack in Helmand Province in 2007.

    The group, vehemently against reconciliation with Kabul, has claimed several high-profile assassinations over the years.

    'Material Support'

    Iran backed the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance before the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, when the Taliban controlled most of Afghanistan. Tehran also provided help to U.S. forces as they toppled the Taliban regime. But in recent years the Islamic republic and the Taliban have forged closer ties, with militant leaders even visiting Tehran.

    Tehran has confirmed it has contacts with the Taliban but insists that it is aimed at ensuring the safety of Iranian citizens in Afghanistan and encouraging the Taliban to join peace talks.

    But U.S. officials have accused Tehran of providing material support to the Taliban, an allegation it denies.

    DDFCF6FC-2EB1-44FB-A034-30A74A54C671_w408_r1_s.jpg

    U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (file photo)
    U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in January accused Tehran of "actively working" to undermine the peace process in Afghanistan, adding that Iran was supporting the Taliban and the Haqqani network.

    In a report released in November, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) said Iran provides financial, political, training, and material support to the Taliban.

    "Tehran does not seek to return the Taliban to power but aims to maintain influence with the group as a hedge in the event that the Taliban gains a role in a future Afghan government," the report said, adding that Iran's support enabled it to advance its interests in Afghanistan and attain "strategic depth" in the country.

    Taliban Divided Over Peace

    The emergence of the Taliban splinter group has exposed serious divisions within the militant group.

    The Taliban is believed to be divided over a peace settlement.

    Its political leadership based in Pakistan is believed to be more open to a peace deal, but hard-line military commanders on the battlefield in Afghanistan demand the restoration of the Taliban regime that ruled from 1996 to 2001.

    Internal Taliban divisions have intensified after the death of founder and spiritual leader Mullah Mohammad Omar, whose death was revealed in 2015, more than two years after he had died in Pakistan.

    B6CC04A7-90D9-4E30-9C85-DBD8EDFC6C0D_w408_r1_s.jpg

    A combination image of what are believed to be photographs of Mullah Mohammad Omar (left) and Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansur
    Some Taliban commanders accused his successor, Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansur, of covering up Mullah Omar's death and assuming leadership of the extremist group without proper approval.

    Mullah Mansur struggled to quell the internal dissent and reconcile feuding factions, with some commanders splitting from the group and challenging his leadership.

    Mullah Mansur was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan in May 2016.

    The succession of Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, a low-key Islamic scholar who was Mullah Mansur's deputy, was also opposed.

    But experts said the Taliban has overcome the succession crises, has fended off competition from the global appeal of the Islamic State (IS) extremist group, and has remained a relatively coherent fighting force despite a deadly war against foreign and Afghan forces.

    E6CA1E4B-4EE2-4794-A901-54142D4A23CA_cx3_cy31_cw94_w408_r1_s.jpg

    Taliban leader Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada (file photo)
    Borhan Osman, an independent analyst and a leading expert on Islamic extremism and the militant networks operating in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region, said divisions within the Taliban are not yet visible.

    "So far, the Taliban has been successful in spinning the agreement with the United States as an outright victory," he said.

    Osman said the Taliban's unity will be tested during intra-Afghan talks, when Afghan and Taliban negotiators will discuss a permanent cease-fire and a power-sharing deal.


    SEE ALSO:
    Afghanistan's Mass Release Of Taliban Prisoners Revives Peace Process, But Seen As 'Big Gamble'

    The negotiations were scheduled to start in March but were delayed by disputes over the release of Taliban prisoners by the government and escalating militant attacks.

    "The Taliban will be forced to come up with specific positions on issues and present their vision for a future Afghanistan," said Osman.

    The Taliban has been ambiguous on key issues, including women's rights, the future distribution of power, and changes to the Afghan Constitution, reflecting the divisions within the group.

    Many expect intra-Afghan negotiations to be complex and protracted, considering the gulf between the sides on policy and the sharing of power between the Taliban and the Afghan government.

    Taliban Offshoots

    Internal rifts and rivalries have led to the emergence of various Taliban offshoots over the years, although many lack the military strength and support to pose a threat to the mainstream group.

    0B52616B-2D4D-47BF-8A0F-DD8EF033E60F_w408_r1_s.jpg

    Mullah Mohammad Rasul (file photo)
    The High Council of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan -- led by Mullah Mohammad Rasul -- has been engaged in deadly clashes with fighters from the mainstream Taliban in southern and western Afghanistan since 2015, leaving scores dead on both sides.

    The clashes have left the offshoot severely weakened, experts said, with many considering the group to be militarily irrelevant.

    Mullah Rasul is believed to receive arms and support from Afghan intelligence in an attempt to divide the militant group.



    .

    https://www.rferl.org/a/afghanistan-taliban-splinter-group-peace-deal-iranian-links/30661777.html
 
Would love what our Iranians members here think :D
 
Fake. Radio Liberty is famous for being a US propagandist channel in Europe.
 
Brace for the ‘Iranian Taliban’ in Afghanistan
June 10, 2020 | Ahmed Quraishi
About three weeks ago, the Afghan intelligence arrested a senior Taliban commander moments after he crossed the border from Iran to Afghanistan. The smooth capture stunned the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force (IRGC-QF), which until now has not faced difficulties in transporting Taliban fighters across the border. The arrest did not register in the American media, but it could be the latest sign for how Iran is positioning Afghanistan to impact U.S. politics ahead of the November election, with reports of shifting of some of its proxy fighters from Syria to the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. More importantly, the incident signifies Iran’s role as the tip of the spear in regional efforts to hasten an American defeat in Afghanistan.

The capture of Qari Shafi, also known as Hafiz Omeri, Taliban’s military chief for Herat province, was significant enough for the Afghan intelligence service, the National Directorate of Intelligence (NDS), to take the rare step of issuing a press statement after the bust, on May 23 (two days after the arrest). It also marked a new level of vigilance by the Afghan intelligence along Iran’s border, and a quiet escalation in tensions between Kabul and Tehran. One thing is for sure: the development would force a change in the operations manual of the IRGC-QF along the border region after years of playing it easy.

The top commander traveled in an IRGC-QF car to the border, and his movement was probably monitored by the Afghans. The IRGC has an informal office for the Afghan Taliban in Mashhad, Iran’s second largest city, not far from the Afghan border. And with the IRGC recruiting some of the Iran-based Sunni Afghan refugees to bolster Taliban ranks, it is likely that Kabul is keeping an eye on the activities of Taliban commanders inside Iran. Indeed, the arrest comes on the heels of Afghanistan expelling two Iranian diplomats over their ties to intelligence operations and membership in the IRGC.

Iran’s immediate objectives in using the Taliban in Afghanistan include retaining influence in Afghan peace talks, stopping Afghan hydropower projects, blocking the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline (which will cross Herat), and generally using its Afghan muscle as a bargaining chip in any future negotiations with United States and the West. Afghanistan is an emerging bargaining chip for Iran’s Khomeinist ruling clique, much like Yemen, Gulf, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza. And, unlike the others in this list, it is an unused one, so far.

But more important is Iran’s larger objective that has received little international attention: ensuring that Afghanistan is firmly placed in the Iran-Russia orbit in case of a complete American disengagement and withdrawal, instead of being dominated by Pakistan and Arab countries, as was the case before 2001. None of this is surprising since Tehran had worked with Moscow (and New Delhi) to support Afghan factions in the civil war of 1990s and up until 9/11.

Qari Shafi, who is also a member of the Taliban’s local leadership council in Herat, left the Tapa Seyah base in Khorasan province in Iran, reportedly one of the IRGC-run camps. At the base, he met Iranian officials who tasked him to sabotage the strategic Afghan Pashdan dam, conduct assassinations in Herat, and generally keep the highways in the Afghan province unsafe, the NDS statement said.

Iran has been using Afghan water for free since the collapse of the Afghan state after the Soviet invasion in 1979, and has become reliant on this source for its parched eastern provinces. The new Afghan hydropower projects will regulate the downriver supply to Iran. Improved Afghan irrigation will also mean the revival of Afghan agriculture, threatening the dominance of Iranian produce supply in the Afghan market. Additionally, the Iranian port of Chabahar is being positioned to play a key role in getting Afghanistan off the American and Pakistani dependency, the two countries responsible for the current Afghan peace process.

The assassinations and highway attacks orchestrated by the Taliban at IRGC’s behest keep the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) weak and disoriented in Herat. The managed chaos keeps Herat and the western provinces destabilized enough to make TAPI and dam projects unsafe. (Similar tactics have been attributed to IRGC-linked cells busted in Bahrain, Karachi/Pakistan, and Tajikistan.)

The reported partial withdrawal (or redeployment) of Iranian proxies from Syria to Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the increased Iranian activity on the Iran-Afghanistan border, shows that Tehran is increasingly likely to use Afghanistan as an avenue for retaliation against the U.S. government ahead of its presidential election in November, one more pressure card against the Trump administration.

Post-9/11, as America, Pakistan, and Kabul quarreled, Iran has systematically cultivated unprecedented influence in Afghanistan, and did it discreetly and methodically, making inroads into Afghan media, government, and politics. The IRGC’s support has been crucial in Taliban’s ability to overrun key provinces in western Afghanistan. The IRGC-QF recruited a British military officer attached to Sir David Richards, then commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan in 2008.

Besides developing a so-called Afghan Card for future negotiations with Washington, the IRGC seems to be representing the interests of state actors in the region that want to get back at America for various reasons (from grievances related to Cold War days to grievances about the Afghan peace process) but do not want to do it overtly and find the Iranian channel a convenient proxy in Afghanistan.

As the arrest of the key IRGC-backed Taliban commander indicates, Iran might finally be readying to profit from its years of quiet investment in Afghanistan, especially after Esmail Ghaani was promoted to the commandership of the IRGC-QF after the death of Qassem Soleimani. Ghaani spent his years as IRGC-QF deputy commander focusing on Afghanistan, and he will likely draw upon his vast network there.

Mohammed Arif Shah Jehan, a former intelligence officer who later became governor of the western Afghan province of Farah, was quoted in 2017 as saying: “The regional politics have changed. The strongest Taliban here are Iranian Taliban.”

Ahmed Quraishi is a journalist based in Islamabad and Dubai who covers national security.
 
Last edited:
Fake. Radio Liberty is famous for being a US propagandist channel in Europe.

چرا دروغ میگی عزیز؟
آیا شما ما را فریب دهید
به من بگویید که آیا این طلبه در ایران است؟

 
چرا دروغ میگی عزیز؟
آیا شما ما را فریب دهید
به من بگویید که آیا این طلبه در ایران است؟

یک، درست صحبت کن، خودت دروغ می گی
دوم، شما که طرفدار طالبان هستی و در تاپیک های دیگه از طالبان پشتیبانی می کنی. هنوز یادم نرفته می گفتی آرزوت هست طالبان برگرده سرکار و حکومت مذهبی بهتر از ناسیونالیزم هست. پس کانادا چی کار می کنی؟
سوم، نزدیک به 4 میلیون افغان در ایران هست، ممکن هست توش تعدادی طرفدارهای طالبان هم باشند که مثل 90% افغان ها غیرقانونی مهاجرت کردن به ایران. خود تو طرفدار طالبان هستی و تو کانادا هستی و تازه احتمالاً قانونی هم مهاجرت کردی. حضور آدمی مثل تو چه ربطی به کانادا داره؟
چهارم، یک ویدئو یوتیوب که حتی چهره طرف هم معلوم نیست از کی مدرک به حساب میاد؟ از کجا معلوم طرف اصلاً به طالبان ربطی داره؟
پنجم، رادیو لیبرتی رسماً از سوی دولت آمریکا پشتیبانی می شه و در جمهوری چک پروپاگاندای آمریکا رو پخش می کنه. حرفش سند نیست​
 
یک، درست صحبت کن، خودت دروغ می گی
دوم، شما که طرفدار طالبان هستی و در تاپیک های دیگه از طالبان پشتیبانی می کنی. هنوز یادم نرفته می گفتی آرزوت هست طالبان برگرده سرکار و حکومت مذهبی بهتر از ناسیونالیزم هست. پس کانادا چی کار می کنی؟
سوم، نزدیک به 4 میلیون افغان در ایران هست، ممکن هست توش تعدادی طرفدارهای طالبان هم باشند که مثل 90% افغان ها غیرقانونی مهاجرت کردن به ایران. خود تو طرفدار طالبان هستی و تو کانادا هستی و تازه احتمالاً قانونی هم مهاجرت کردی. حضور آدمی مثل تو چه ربطی به کانادا داره؟
چهارم، یک ویدئو یوتیوب که حتی چهره طرف هم معلوم نیست از کی مدرک به حساب میاد؟ از کجا معلوم طرف اصلاً به طالبان ربطی داره؟
پنجم، رادیو لیبرتی رسماً از سوی دولت آمریکا پشتیبانی می شه و در جمهوری چک پروپاگاندای آمریکا رو پخش می کنه. حرفش سند نیست​

Why don't you share with the world how those alleged 4 million Afghan refugees are treated in Iran?
 
Why don't you share with the world how those alleged 4 million Afghan refugees are treated in Iran?
Because
1. It's irrelevant to the thread,
2. Most of them are illegal refugees and have not entered Iran legally,
3. They are treated a lot better than in Pakistan,
4. They are treated well in most cases and that's why they continue to live in Iran and do not return to Afghanistan or go to other countries like Pakistan.

Meanwhile, good to know that you understand a bit of Persian. At least enough to extrapolate.
 
Because
1. It's irrelevant to the thread,
2. Most of them are illegal refugees and have not entered Iran legally,
3. They are treated a lot better than in Pakistan,
4. They are treated well in most cases and that's why they continue to live in Iran and do not return to Afghanistan or go to other countries like Pakistan.

Meanwhile, good to know that you understand Persian.

there is constant war in their country. for all the self sufficiency and material richness you guys harp about. you surely have very tiny hearts to accommodate just 4 million of them.

its not like war in Afghanistan has hampered your economy like it ravaged Pakistan's.

have some heart man. even an agnostic heart would do
 
یک، درست صحبت کن، خودت دروغ می گی
دوم، شما که طرفدار طالبان هستی و در تاپیک های دیگه از طالبان پشتیبانی می کنی. هنوز یادم نرفته می گفتی آرزوت هست طالبان برگرده سرکار و حکومت مذهبی بهتر از ناسیونالیزم هست. پس کانادا چی کار می کنی؟
سوم، نزدیک به 4 میلیون افغان در ایران هست، ممکن هست توش تعدادی طرفدارهای طالبان هم باشند که مثل 90% افغان ها غیرقانونی مهاجرت کردن به ایران. خود تو طرفدار طالبان هستی و تو کانادا هستی و تازه احتمالاً قانونی هم مهاجرت کردی. حضور آدمی مثل تو چه ربطی به کانادا داره؟
چهارم، یک ویدئو یوتیوب که حتی چهره طرف هم معلوم نیست از کی مدرک به حساب میاد؟ از کجا معلوم طرف اصلاً به طالبان ربطی داره؟
پنجم، رادیو لیبرتی رسماً از سوی دولت آمریکا پشتیبانی می شه و در جمهوری چک پروپاگاندای آمریکا رو پخش می کنه. حرفش سند نیست​

سلام و احترام. محترم! این شما بودئید که در سال 2001 در کمک مستقیم و غیر مستقیم آمریکا دولت طالبان را بزانو در آوردید. یعنی شما به گونه یی همکار شیطان بزرگ یا امریکا شدید. ثالثاً شما نشنلیزم تاجیک را تحت نشنلیزم فارس و هزاره ها شیعه را تحت مذهب شعیه علیه دولت برحال و ضد طالبانی افغانستان کمک میکنید، در حالیکه خودتان کمتر به مذهب شیعه پابند و معتقد هستید. با اینها شما در حال کمک کردن به طالبان سُنی مذهب علیه دولت افغانستان هستید و جنگ را در افغانستان مشتعل نگهمیدارئید، همزمان از حضور مهاجرین وپناهندگان افغان در ایران شاکی هستید، درحالیکه هر میدان جنگ از خود مهاجرین و پناهندگان دارد. در خاتمه اینکه من در کانادا هستم نتیجه هیپوکراسی کشورهای همسایه افغانستان چون ایران است، ورنه افغانستان زیبا ترین کشور در خاورمیانه میباشد
 
there is constant war in their country. for all the self sufficiency and material richness you guys harp about. you surely have very tiny hearts to accommodate just 4 million of them.

its not like war in Afghanistan has hampered your economy like it ravaged Pakistan's.

have some heart man. even an agnostic heart would do
Turkey is hosting fewer than 4 million Syrian refugees and it constantly cries about it, thinking that it justifies their invasion of the Syrian territory. As a supporter of Turkish policies on this forum, you surely have no shame to bring such a thing up. Needless to say that hosting 4 million refugees is indeed a huge help to Afghanistan.

Iran is currently under sanctions. You are proud of your support for Al-Qaeda affiliated Taliban. So, why don't you take them if you are so keen on interfering in their internal affairs?

سلام و احترام. محترم! این شما بودئید که در سال 2001 در کمک مستقیم و غیر مستقیم آمریکا دولت طالبان را بزانو در آوردید. یعنی شما به گونه یی همکار شیطان بزرگ یا امریکا شدید. ثالثاً شما نشنلیزم تاجیک را تحت نشنلیزم فارس و هزاره ها شیعه را تحت مذهب شعیه علیه دولت برحال و ضد طالبانی افغانستان کمک میکنید، در حالیکه خودتان کمتر به مذهب شیعه پابند و معتقد هستید. با اینها شما در حال کمک کردن به طالبان سُنی مذهب علیه دولت افغانستان هستید و جنگ را در افغانستان مشتعل نگهمیدارئید، همزمان از حضور مهاجرین وپناهندگان افغان در ایران شاکی هستید، درحالیکه هر میدان جنگ از خود مهاجرین و پناهندگان دارد. در خاتمه اینکه من در کانادا هستم نتیجه هیپوکراسی کشورهای همسایه افغانستان چون ایران است، ورنه افغانستان زیبا ترین کشور در خاورمیانه میباشد
دوست گرامی، طالبان شما 5 نفر از دیپلمات های ایران رو سر برید. کمکی که ما به آمریکا کردیم چیزی جز حق طالبان نبود و اگر دوباره تاریخ تکرار بشه شک نکن باز هم به آمریکا برای سرنگون کردن طالبان کمک می کنیم

طالبان عزیز شما چند هزار نفر از هزاره های بی گناه رو دست جمعی کشت و سال ها مردم افغانستان رو سرکوب کرد و از نخستین حقوق مانند درس خوندن محرومشون کرد بعد کسی مانند شما در کانادا نشسته از چنین گروه کثیفی پشتیبانی می کنه

شما یک گروه شیعه مذهب که الان داره با دولت افغانستان می جنگه رو نام ببر. اگر نمی تونی سکوت گاهی خیلی خوب هست

این که شما در کانادا هستی اما از طالبان پشتیبانی می کنی ولی چون یک طرفدار طالبان در ایران هست تلاش می کنی مدرک سازی جعلی بکنی نشون دهنده هیپوکرسی شما هست دوست گرامی من​
 
Last edited:
Turkey is hosting fewer than 4 million Syrian refugees and it constantly cries about it, thinking that it justifies their invasion of the Syrian territory. As a support of Turkish policies, you surely have no shame to bring such a thing up. Needless to say that hosting 4 million refugees is indeed a huge help to Afghanistan.

Iran is currently under sanctions. You are proud of your support for Al-Qaeda affiliated Taliban. So, why don't you take them if you are so keen on interfering in their internal affairs?

You cannot really compare Afghanistan with Syria. Afghanistan has seen war since the 70s.

Turkey has every right to create safe zones if everyone is hell bent on destroying Syria.

I have no intention of discussing Al Qaeda with an Iranian whose state policy is out of one of Al Qaedas brochure.
 
You cannot really compare Afghanistan with Syria. Afghanistan has seen war since the 70s.

Turkey has every right to create safe zones if everyone is hell bent on destroying Syria.

I have no intention of discussing Al Qaeda with an Iranian whose state policy is out of one of Al Qaedas brochure.
It doesn't matter. 4 million refugees is 4 million. The rest is irrelevant.

That just proves your hypocrisy and invalidates your claims of high morality, which was clearly hypocritical from the very beginning.

I think you tried this strategy of engaging me in such a debate once and you were severely defeated in another thread. :D Your country is proud of supporting Taliban in Afghanistan, pretending that it's against the US, while your country has never made any move against the US interests. Even when the US violated your sovereignty. Your country fully complies with US regional policies and dictates.
 
It doesn't matter. 4 million refugees is 4 million. The rest is irrelevant.

That just proves your hypocrisy and invalidates your claims of high morality, which was clearly hypocritical from the very beginning.

I think you tried this strategy of engaging me in such a debate once and you were severely defeated in another thread. :D Your country is proud of supporting Taliban in Afghanistan, pretending that it's against the US, while your country has never made any move against the US interests. Even when the US violated your sovereignty. Your country fully complies with US regional policies and dictates.

My first question to you was to show the world how you truly treat those alleged 4 million refugees.

I don't need to entertain your antics about the US.
 
My first question to you was to show the world how you truly treat those alleged 4 million refugees.

I don't need to entertain your antics about the US.
And you were given a clear response. Read it again.

You can read it again and again. Nothing is stopping you.
 
Back
Top Bottom