What's new

Syrian air defenses repel Israeli aggression, intercept several hostile missiles over Damascus

You fail to understand that the reason there is no proof for specifically Iranian casualties, is that Israel never took responsibility for the bombing.

This is a strange logic. Regardless of whether you took responsibility or not, those people would have still died, right? so where is the evidence any such people died? Any names?


Iran, on the other hand, did claim responsibility and should prove they killed Americans, as long as they didn't, we assume they are lying.

By this logic, as long as we can't see proof of people killed in Syria by Israel, then we should assume you're lying to then when you claim Israel killed x or y. Taking responsibility is irrelevant here. They either died or did not die.

I am telling you I was wrong, it wasn't the Israeli intelligence that claimed the casualties are Iranian. Those were Syrian claims.

Good, so now let's wait to see your proof these Syrian "claims" were not just misinformation.
 
By this logic, as long as we can't see proof of people killed in Syria by Israel, then we should assume you're lying to then when you claim Israel killed x or y. Taking responsibility is irrelevant here. They either died or did not die.
You want to know about Iranians killed in Syria?
Just look at this long list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Israel_conflict_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War#cite_note-84

Amongst them, the most recent key figure that was identified was Farhad Dabirian.
 
You want to know about Iranians killed in Syria?
Just look at this long list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Israel_conflict_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War#cite_note-84

Amongst them, the most recent key figure that was identified was Farhad Dabirian.

Your sources are getting stranger by the second. Wikipedia? I can edit that now to say Soleimani was killed by a drone controlled by Netanyahu. Iranians have died in Syria, but only a very small number have died due to your strikes. Anyway, this has gone off track to the original comment. We were discussing Iran's attack.
 
Your sources are getting stranger by the second. Wikipedia? I can edit that now to say Soleimani was killed by a drone controlled by Netanyahu. Iranians have died in Syria, but only a very small number have died due to your strikes. Anyway, this has gone off track to the original comment. We were discussing Iran's attack.
They're all referenced and confirmed in the bibliography.
Small number is relative. Because the number of Iranians killed is at least in the few dozens. possibly a couple hundred.

I'm tired of this, I have nothing to gain by proving something to you.
 
They're all referenced and confirmed in the bibliography.

Vast majority of those sources are Israeli.


Small number is relative. Because the number of Iranians killed is at least in the few dozens. possibly a couple hundred.

Dozens yes, couple hundred? very unlikely.

I'm tired of this, I have nothing to gain by proving something to you.

If you could prove anything, this would not have been tiresome for you. At the end of the day, what I said from the beginning is lets just wait for evidence but not make statements like "Iran is lying".
 
yes, couple hundred? very unlikely.
You do understand that my sole purpose was to show Iranians were killed in airstrikes, without any response against Israel, right?
 
You do understand that my sole purpose was to show Iranians were killed in airstrikes, without any response against Israel, right?

We have already had this discussion (few days ago), have we not. I explained to you why Iranian groups in Syria were not retaliating?
 
You want to know about Iranians killed in Syria?
Just look at this long list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Israel_conflict_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War#cite_note-84

Amongst them, the most recent key figure that was identified was Farhad Dabirian.
but that article from Jerusalem Post didn't provide evidence only claims
 
We have already had this discussion (few days ago), have we not. I explained to you why Iranian groups in Syria were not retaliating?
That kinda makes you look weak, that "preoccupied" excuse.

but that article from Jerusalem Post didn't provide evidence only claims
Which article?
 
That kinda makes you look weak, that "preoccupied" excuse.

It's not just the pre-occupied comment. It's the fact the Syrians and the groups in Syria have little to gain by retaliating against Israel and giving Israel excuse for further escalation and even allow the US to get more deeply involved. Surely you can see this? like I have said many times over, only a foolish nation risks its long terms goals for some short term glory kills, retaliation etc.
 
the one you linked
I linked Wikipedia bro

It's not just the pre-occupied comment. It's the fact the Syrians and the groups in Syria have little to gain by retaliating against Israel and giving Israel excuse for further escalation and even allow the US to get more deeply involved. Surely you can see this? like I have said many times over, only a foolish nation risks its long terms goals for some short term glory kills, retaliation etc.
Iran is not preoccupied.
And seems like to your little alliance, glory kills is a top priority.
 
Iran is not preoccupied.

Iran itself rarely gets involved directly with other hostile nations. So we're focusing on mainly Iranian allies in Syria.

And seems like to your little alliance, glory kills is a top priority.

If that was true, then you would have seen countless attacks against Israeli interests.
 
EXGW299XsAAvrjE


EXGW3-cWoAEEimT


9 bunkers in center of Syria destroyed. Magic S-400, S-300, Buk-2, Pantsir etc etc as usually counld not do anything. More Iranian petrodollars gone with the wind.
 
Syria needs an airforce
 
Back
Top Bottom