Syrian air defenses repel Israeli aggression, intercept several hostile missiles over Damascus

[Trench Broom]

No Iranian gets killed. As usual Israeli airforce bombs poor native Arabs employed by IRGC.

Sure, Iranians are invincible like Qasem Salami...oh wait.

Iranians have boots on the ground in Syria. Iranians are smuggling weapons in Syria to Hezbollah. Israel is hitting these weapons. And you believe the Iranians are escaping each time, yet independent observers are reporting Iranian deaths each time.

Coffin makers in Tehran is a thriving business.

 

[Genghis khan1]

Its common knowledge that 95% of the casualties in the Israeli (or US) airstrikes in Arab countries are native Arabs working for the IRGC. Pakistanis and Afghans are in the second place by recruiting numbers and casualties.

About this attack, show proof they are Iranian soldiers from Iran.

Then these poor Arabs pass along Sulemani Location to US and Kaboom..

 

[Rukarl]

Sure, Iranians are invincible like Qasem Salami...oh wait.

Iranians have boots on the ground in Syria. Iranians are smuggling weapons in Syria to Hezbollah. Israel is hitting these weapons. And you believe the Iranians are escaping each time, yet independent observers are reporting Iranian deaths each time.

Coffin makers in Tehran is a thriving business.

Again, you are not providing any evidence at all. Sure a few top military officials will be targetted once in a while but the majority of the airstrikes, like i said, are killing native fighters/citizens of those countries.

Ofcourse Iranians have boots on the ground in Syria, but i doubt the supervising commanders and officers sipping on their cup of tea in a safe military headquarters were the target. High likely that the job of transportation logistics and setting up were done by the people in the lower chain of command (comprises of mostly native or Afghans or Pakistanis).

 

[Mrc]

These air defences in syria never shoot down a fighter or a drone

But they are so good i' shooting down missiles (unvarifiable claims)

 

[500]

Assadist-English dictionary:

- Syrian air defence repel Israeli aggression
- Fired some SAMs into nowhere 20 minutes after Israelis left.

 

[Aramagedon]

Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "The Jews will fight with you, and you will be given victory over them so that a stone will say, 'O Muslim! There is a Jew behind me; kill him!' "

The Messenger of Allah(ﷺ) said, "The Last Hour will not come until the Muslims fight against the Jews, until a Jew will hide himself behind a stone or a tree, and the stone or the tree will say: 'O Muslim, there is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him! "

https://sunnah.com/search/?q=Jew

https://sunnah.com/bukhari/61/100

 

[khansaheeb]

Those are the targets we bomb lmao


Syria has it's own S-300 shortly since the IL20 incident. But it's useless.


It did.


Imagine being this delusional.

Israel has been "bombing Syria periodically" for decades now.

Remember if you bomb, you can be bombed; and boy is Iran making big bombs, enough to flatten Tel-Aviv.

 

[Beny Karachun]

This is strange form of reasoning. Just because the weapon in questions belong to Iran, it does not equate to casualties being Iranian too.

It sure does mean that when Israel reports on Iranian casualties and the trucks and weapons are Iranian, especially if it's the thousandth time it does it.

Remember if you bomb, you can be bombed; and boy is Iran making big bombs, enough to flatten Tel-Aviv.

You overestimate Iran's capability to reach Israel, conventional warhead strength and Iranian ballistic missile accuracy, while greatly underestimating Israel's ability to intercept those missiles and Israel's ability to prevent further Iranian missile launches, conventionally or unconventionally.

Iranian ballistic missile might be able to destroy a somewhat large Israeli village with a few hundred houses, nothing more.

Its common knowledge that 95% of the casualties in the Israeli (or US) airstrikes in Arab countries are native Arabs working for the IRGC. Pakistanis and Afghans are in the second place by recruiting numbers and casualties.

About this attack, show proof they are Iranian soldiers from Iran.

How is it common knowledge lol I have never heard that, show me proof for your 95% claim.
My proof is what Israel says, so you wouldn't believe it anyways. Are you denying Israel killed Iranians with our airstrikes?

It would appear the main substance of my comment went over your head. I am not surprised. Try focusing on why they're not replying right now.

It would appear the opposite, notice how I said for decades, that's before any civil war in Syria. 2007 Syrian nuclear reactor bombing is a great example, all Syria could do is deny, as it always does.
I guess your excuse is Syria being preoccupied but the troops killed were Iranian, maybe we will just conquer it .

Because it's preoccupied, am I right?

 

[khansaheeb]

It sure does mean that when Israel reports on Iranian casualties and the trucks and weapons are Iranian, especially if it's the thousandth time it does it.


You overestimate Iran's capability to reach Israel, conventional warhead strength and Iranian ballistic missile accuracy, while greatly underestimating Israel's ability to intercept those missiles and Israel's ability to prevent further Iranian missile launches, conventionally or unconventionally.

Iranian ballistic missile might be able to destroy a somewhat large Israeli village with a few hundred houses, nothing more.


How is it common knowledge lol I have never heard that, show me proof for your 95% claim.
My proof is what Israel says, so you wouldn't believe it anyways. Are you denying Israel killed Iranians with our airstrikes?


It would appear the opposite, notice how I said for decades, that's before any civil war in Syria. 2007 Syrian nuclear reactor bombing is a great example, all Syria could do is deny, as it always does.
I guess your excuse is Syria being preoccupied but the troops killed were Iranian, maybe we will just conquer it .

You are clearly out of touch with reality, Iran proved their capability by their deadly accurate strike in Iraq. Their long range IBMs are just as accurate, they also have cruise missiles. As for Pakistan's ability don't even think about it, as we can wipe you off the map in minutes.

 

[Philosopher]

It sure does mean that when Israel reports on Iranian casualties and the trucks and weapons are Iranian, especially if it's the thousandth time it does it.

Israel has never provided any evidence of these "Iranian casualties". Apparently Israel equated Iranian hardware destroyed to Iranian casualties.

Iranian ballistic missile accuracy

How could Iranian missiles get any more accurate? They're already as pin point as it can get practically.

Iranian ballistic missile might be able to destroy a somewhat large Israeli village with a few hundred houses, nothing more.

Then I suggest you listen to your own Israeli experts like Uzi Rubin. He has stating many times that Iran does not even need nukes when it has the accurate missile systems it does. A few attacks on Israeli power plants and your entire nation is paralysed.

It would appear the opposite, notice how I said for decades, that's before any civil war in Syria. 2007 Syrian nuclear reactor bombing is a great example, all Syria could do is deny, as it always does.

I am talking in the context of Iran in Syria today. What Syria did decades ago matters little in my discussion.

I guess your excuse is Syria being preoccupied but the troops killed were Iranian, maybe we will just conquer it .

Because it's preoccupied, am I right?

It is rather simple, I cannot make it easier to digest for you. The fact that these various groups in Syria and Syrian army itself are not retaliating is to prevent further escalation for the time being. As I explained to the other member above, this is about the long game. Only a fool will sacrifice their long term goals for some momentary and short term glories. Do you think Syria could not retaliate back? of course it could, but what would it gain right now?

 

[500]

Mullahs destroyed Iranian economy by supporting Assad and other terrorists. That what matters. How mow many their baboons die in Syria - not important at all.

 

[Beny Karachun]

You are clearly out of touch with reality, Iran proved their capability by their deadly accurate strike in Iraq. Their long range IBMs are just as accurate, they also have cruise missiles. As for Pakistan's ability don't even think about it, as we can wipe you off the map in minutes.

What deadly accurate strike

4 Missiles failed in flight, 1 didn't explode, and another one missed by 20 kilometers.
6 out of 17 missiles. That's already 65% success rate.
Now out of the 11 that hit the air base, only 5 managed to hit an actual building or a garage or something or significance. So only 29 percent of the missiles actually hit their probably intended target. And we're talking about an airbase with no missile defense system.
The only casualties that were inflicted were traumatical and not physical.
I would call this attack a fail.

Israel has never provided any evidence of these "Iranian casualties". Apparently Israel equated Iranian hardware destroyed to Iranian casualties.

Do you want us to extract the body remains from Syria and deliver them to Iran for confirmation? Our intelligence says they're Iranian. I believe them.

 

[Aramagedon]

Mullahs will be on your throats soon.

The Messenger of Allah(ﷺ) said, Black standards will come from Khurasan (Iran), nothing shall turn them back until they are planted in Jerusalem.

 

[Beny Karachun]

How could Iranian missiles get any more accurate? They're already as pin point as it can get practically.

29% accuracy at most in Iran's recent strike at Iraq.

Then I suggest you listen to your own Israeli experts like Uzi Rubin. He has stating many times that Iran does not even need nukes when it has the accurate missile systems it does. A few attacks on Israeli power

I don't need to listen to anyone I have my own brain. Alright bomb our powerstation, we will do the same in return with a few megatons of bombs.
Just be sure to not miss them by 20 kilometers.

It is rather simple, I cannot make it easier to digest for you. The fact that these various groups in Syria and Syrian army itself are not retaliating is to prevent further escalation for the time being. As I explained to the other member above, this is about the long game. Only a fool will sacrifice their long term goals for some momentary and short term glories. Do you think Syria could not retaliate back? of course it could, but what would it gain right now?

You're not getting it, Israel has been bombing Syria long before they've been preoccupied by anything. Syria keeps threatening that it will launch ballistic missiles at Israel in response, or use the S-300, but it doesn't. What did it buy the S-300 for? Definitely not ISIS.

 

[Philosopher]

29% accuracy at most in Iran's recent strike at Iraq.

What sort of "analysis" is this?

Lets assume those facts are correct. If 4 missiles failed during the firing state and 1 failed to explode, then how does that count in terms of missiles missing their targets i.e accuracy? Furthermore, you're trying to pretend as if you know what Iran was targeting in order to claim it missed that targets. This is the level of accuracy we're talking:

That is the facts, not your seemingly deliberately attempt at misinformation using wikipedia as a source.

I don't need to listen to anyone I have my own brain.

As you have just demonstrated above, your ability to do even a simple analysis fell very short. So yes, you indeed do need to listen to actual experts.

Alright bomb our powerstation, we will do the same in return with a few megatons of bombs.

Ah the good old "we'll nuke you back" argument.

Just be sure to not miss them by 20 kilometers.

As long as you learn to refrain from such a lackluster breakdown of the attacks, then don't worry, in the real world things are different to your wikipedia assembled "facts".

You're not getting it, Israel has been bombing Syria long before they've been preoccupied by anything.

I am afraid you're the one not getting the simple issue of time scale. We're talking about the lack of response from Syria and non-Syrian groups today and you're talking about decades ago.

Syria keeps threatening that it will launch ballistic missiles at Israel in response, or use the S-300, but it doesn't. What did it buy the S-300 for? Definitely not ISIS.

S-300 is most definitely under Russian control. And the S-300 is not a silver bullet system, as you can see, Israel is using tactics to avoid being in it's eyes.

Do you want us to extract the body remains from Syria and deliver them to Iran for confirmation? Our intelligence says they're Iranian. I believe them.

You can choose to believe claims without facts, but we're may not be so willing to buy everything your government or intelligence claims.