What's new

ICJ rejects India’s plea for acquittal, repatriation of Kulbhushan - Updates, News & Discussion

What a great show of indian mentality ,,, ICJ did not bound Pakistan with any thing (in regards of courts , ICJ did not cancel or said anything about courts or verdict) so we can chose time and place of our own choice "If we want to"...….
Indian media lol
D_rznSpXoAE62hY.jpg
 
Source.
Or call yourself a dumb head
That is your fuking problem dumbfuk ……. Your guy caught pent down ICJ accepted now enjoy ….. Run from this reality as much as you want ………… lololololo
For source go check icj web don't waist mu time
 
If things were in my hands, I would have hired a some people, who would foght the reqo deck case on the terms that, we are suing Tethyan 10 million dollars, and if we won the case, 5 millions goes to Lawers.
 
i have lately being seeing china..slowly distance itself from pakistan in world forums to improve its image....

I think the push towards usa...is having its effect
That's a
Your telling your story to Pakistan!!

His case is being reviewed by Pakistan as per Pakistani law

Do you understand!!!

He's toast
As per pakistani law -----
Civil not military......

Now military courts will have the limelight
 
Your telling your story to Pakistan!!

His case is being reviewed by Pakistan as per Pakistani law

Do you understand!!!

He's toast

yeah but he was already ready to be toasted when the ARMY courts sentenced him to death with no counselor access.....

then he was removed from the toaster...thanks to ICJ ...

now the indians get to look at the bread more closely......and tell the guests that the bread is stale...
 
That is your fuking problem dumbfuk ……. Your guy caught pent down ICJ accepted now enjoy ….. Run from this reality as much as you want ………… lololololo
For source go check icj web don't waist mu time
Running away when u can't face truth.....
That is your fuking problem dumbfuk ……. Your guy caught pent down ICJ accepted now enjoy ….. Run from this reality as much as you want ………… lololololo
For source go check icj web don't waist mu time
Comeback when you get some........
Nevermind
 
Is that being fought in the ICJ?
If not, then stick to the topic. I have very little patience for such nonsense deflection.



Are you the ICJ? Take the balakot strike to the ICJ and we will present our evidence there. We have nothing to prove to you otherwise.

If you have something tangible to say on the ICJ case, I’m happy to discuss.



No absolutely false.
The entire case was about the handling of the KJ trial and subject (whether the military trial and subsequent death penalty was valid and appropriate) and process, NOT on whether Jadhav is a spy. You now have to prove through a fair trial that he indeed is a spy and involved in terrorism.
I think you need to read again what this trial was about and the objections raised.

Share the points where ICJ declared the trial null and void simple? That is the answer of your question... see the 1st point

66934756_10206081504474501_1893646644105183232_n.jpg
 
yeah but he was already ready to be toasted when the ARMY courts sentenced him to death with no counselor access.....

then he was removed from the toaster...thanks to ICJ ...

now the indians get to look at the bread more closely......and tell the guests that the bread is stale...
A single picture says it all
Screenshot_20190717-225246.png
 
India has not provided any documentation of his identity

India will need to provide this documentation inorder to prove he is a citizen before being provided consular access

We will then review hia case as per Pakistani law

Then we will hang him!

Pakistan didn’t follow legal procedure of informing India of his arrest.
Hence India was under no obligation to provide documentation of any kind to assist with the conviction of Jadhav.
Now that the record is set straight, documentation shall be provided, and you will have to provide consular access period!
 
Running away when u can't face truth.....

Comeback when you get some........
Nevermind
I am here go find the source …… don't waist our time ……… Stop running …
 
For all the lying people in here saying that India ONLY demanded access ... See below what all they demanded and what ONLY they got today!

FINAL SUBMISSION
BY THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA

(1) The Government of India requests this Court to adjudge and declare that, Pakistan acted in
egregious breach of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 1963 (Vienna
Convention) in:
(i) Failing to inform India, without delay, of the detention of Jadhav;
(ii) Failing to inform Jadhav of his rights under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on
Consular Relations, 1963;
(iii) Declining access to Jadhav by consular officers of India, contrary to their right to visit
Jadhav, while under custody, detention or in prison, and to converse and correspond with
him, or to arrange for his legal representation.
And that pursuant to the foregoing,
(2) Declare that:
(a) the sentence by Pakistan’s military court arrived at, in brazen defiance of the Vienna
Convention rights under Article 36, particularly Article 36 paragraph 1 (b), and in
defiance of elementary human rights of Mr. Jadhav, which are also to be given effect as
mandated under Article 14 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR), is violative of international law and the provisions of the Vienna
Convention;
(b) India is entitled to restitutio in integrum;
(3) Annul the decision of the Military Court and restrain Pakistan from giving effect to the
sentence or conviction in any manner, and
(4) direct it to release the Indian National, Jadhav, forthwith, and to facilitate his safe passage to
India;
5) In the alternative, and if this Court were to find that Jadhav is not to be released, then
(i) Annul the decision of the Military Court and restrain Pakistan from giving effect to the
sentence awarded by the Military Court,
or in the further alternative
(ii) direct it to take steps to annul the decision of the military court, as may be available to it
under the laws in force in Pakistan,
and in either event
(iii) direct a trial under the ordinary law before civilian courts, after excluding his confession
that was recorded without affording consular access, and in strict conformity with the
provisions of the ICCPR, with full consular access and with a right to India to arrange for
his legal representation.

Thank you.
The PRESIDENT: I thank the Agent of India, Dr. Mittal. The Court takes note of the final
submissions which you have just read on behalf of the Republic of India.

https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/168


#2 - rejected
#3 - rejected
#4 - rejected
#5 - rejected
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom