What's new

Air War Is Coming:---

Ur Indian airforce was bulldozed by modi when he said in a large public gathering that we miss RAFAELs if we had them, we would hve better results meaning that IAF had nothing to fight with except those super widow makers mig 21s and bringing SU30 and mirrages is a risk to losing them also ?

No.

He meant that Rahul Gandhi was being unfair to him by accusing him of favouring Anil Ambani for the Rafale offset deal, when he, Modi, was actually acting with the purest of motives.

Learn a little more and froth at the mouth a little less before commenting. :enjoy:


While whole world is laughing on ur airchief who says we didn't counted the terrorists dead in the balakot attack, it's govts job?

I agree with you.

He should have flown over, got off his chopper, and done a body-count. His job, indubitably.

It does not matter that intercepted signals showed nearly 300 mobile phone lines in operation days before the raid, and none after. It's still the Air Chief's job.

People like you reassure many of us nervous about war. With enemies like you, who needs friends?


His job is to send a few sorties in the darkest hour of the night then throw few bombs on some unpopulated hills and bring back, a prapoganda bomb for your modi paid media and for modi to claim he is new hindu God, for all The Indians who they should bow down and give votes for next 100 years to come? :rofl:

Quite right.

He should have done the job properly, like your Air Chief most properly did. Boots on the ground, even for the Air Force; that's why Pakistan won every battle.

But look what happened, congress blocked him and ambanis getting RAFAELs and India lost another flying cofin, belive me his election stunt is over and now he is very afraid and confused what if IAF tries another strike and all of its flying cofin gets shot down in Pakistan and them praded in shorts for Indian media, can he survive that image in the eyes of indian ppls then ?? :cheers:

If they are paraded in shorts, Modi will not survive. The Indian people are getting fed up of people in shorts. If you have seen pictures of yourself in shorts, I am sure you will share their discomfort.

Ask some one about me, then come bck and hit me what ever u got , u ill be surprised

We did ask.

We were surprised.

Not, perhaps, in the way you thought, but BOY, were we surprised!
 
After India Loses Dogfight to Pakistan, Questions Arise About Its ‘Vintage’ Military
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/03/world/asia/india-military-united-states-china.html

There u go mother india answer NY TIMES not us?
Thts where u stand exactly, you can play with all the words you got, but the fact still be there in your face :cheers:

Yes, indeed, now that you are fighting wars in the pages of the New York Times, there is no hope. We should simply take off our khaki chaddis, fly them on flag staffs, and surrender.
 
And why do you think, in spite of the multitudinous sea of bhakts, I prefer to stay on in ole Mother India?

I may stop holding very positive views on you, if you flee your country now.

However you should remember that the MiG 21 has FOUR hard points; it is not necessary that seeing 2 R-73s means that it carried only 2 R-73s. No jackass would send his planes out half-armed.

The captured wing commander in his departing statement said "I was searching for a target". I don't hold technical knowledge on military strategies and operations ...... but my common sense dictates me that it won't be very wise to load all hard points with short range A2A missiles.
 
Do you remember the word 'glide' that you used? Or was that somebody who cracked your mail id?
Rather than picking specific words and try to divert the topic , why dont you answer the question that if we throw an aerodynamic brick of 18.5 tons at Mach 2 in straight direction at several thousand feets than how far it will likely to travel?

Try to be a man and dont get blinded folded by your nationality otherwise you don't deserve professional status ...
 
I may stop holding very positive views on you, if you flee your country now.

I was afraid of that.

Goodbye, Mauritius.

The captured wing commander in his departing statement said "I was searching for a target". I don't hold technical knowledge on military strategies and operations ...... but my common sense dictates me that it won't be very wise to load all hard points with short range A2A missiles.

Think about it: would you send up someone in hot pursuit without a brief to follow the enemy home to that mission's airfield of origin with long-range weapons? His specific comment about the incident was that he had locked on with an R-73. Does he then pause for a moment of quiet introspection?

Rather than picking specific words and try to divert the topic , why dont you answer the question that if we throw an aerodynamic brick of 18.5 tons at Mach 2 in straight direction at several thousand feets than how far it will likely to travel?

Try to be a man and dont get blinded folded by your nationality otherwise you don't deserve professional status ...

I am right on target. It will not travel any significant distance. For an example, look at the video clips of a plane crashing shown on Pakistani social media. It plummeted straight down.

Try to use your sceptical approach somewhere else.

Two are reserved for fuel tanks?

Heh. Not on a mission flying CAP.

Another thing for you to think about: consider what a drop-tank does. It provides an auxiliary source of fuel to the plane. That is, it is connected to the fuel system. Would you run your bus lines along with your fuel lines?

However, full points for visualising an alternative possibility.

You are forgetting that the plane was carrying 2 fuel tanks as well. They have been salvaged from the wreck as well.

I answered that elsewhere, sweetheart. Just think things through. I'm not disbelieving you, but you also need to think what happens under the skin of an aircraft. BTW, it is odd that the plane was carrying drop tanks for a CAP. There are loitering missions, on standby in the air; there are also situations of standby on the ground. All reports speak of the planes being scrambled from the ground. Why it had drop tanks beats me, but it doesn't clash for space, I believe. I have asked that question to somebody who knows the hard points better than I do.
 
Send more Jets we are waiting not worried at all as long as we have good tea

53489206_1968666169929304_7428862691164291072_n.jpg
 
Think about it: would you send up someone in hot pursuit without a brief to follow the enemy home to that mission's airfield of origin with long-range weapons? His specific comment about the incident was that he had locked on with an R-73. Does he then pause for a moment of quiet introspection?

That brief (I am guessing) would most probably include wordings like "Stand off weapons" ...... secondly the hot pursuit ..... depends when it started, based on most public accounts, it started when the intruding PAF jets had completed their assigned missions and were returning back ....... now coming after those jets thinking that the other side is not waiting for you is actually something I am not willing to buy ..... you were downed in our territory .... why would you take that risk?

Anyways whatever happened .... both sides know very well ....... and I am not interested in knowing more about it. I will wait for the actual official confirmations .... when made available for others outside our countries.
 
I am right on target. It will not travel any significant distance. For an example, look at the video clips of a plane crashing shown on Pakistani social media. It plummeted straight down.

Try to use your sceptical approach somewhere else.
You proved it that you don't deserve the professional title ... So this conversation is over ...

Here is the investigation result of flight MH 117 of Malaysia shot by Buk SAM:

The Dutch Safety Board reported a last flight data recording at 16:20 local time (13:20 UTC), located west of the urban-type settlement Rozsypne (Розсипне), near Hrabove heading east-southeast (ESE, 115°) at 494 knots (915 km/h; 568 mph).[3]

At exactly 16:20:03 local time (13:20:03 UTC) a Buk ground-to-air missile, which had been launched from an area east from the aircraft, detonated outside the aircraft just above the cockpit to the left. An explosive decompression occurred, resulting in both the cockpit and tail sections tearing away from the middle portion of the fuselage. All three sections disintegrated as they fell rapidly towards the ground.

The majority of debris landed near Hrabove, a village located north of Torez in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast. The debris spread over a 50 square kilometres (19 sq mi) area to the southwest of Hrabove.[7]:53 The fireball on impact is believed to have been captured on video.[74] Photographs from the site of the crash show scattered pieces of broken fuselage and engine parts, bodies, and passports.[75] Some of the wreckage fell close to houses.[76] Dozens of bodies fell into crop fields, and some fell into houses.[77]
 
Heh. Not on a mission flying CAP.

Another thing for you to think about: consider what a drop-tank does. It provides an auxiliary source of fuel to the plane. That is, it is connected to the fuel system. Would you run your bus lines along with your fuel lines?

However, full points for visualising an alternative possibility.



I answered that elsewhere, sweetheart. Just think things through. I'm not disbelieving you, but you also need to think what happens under the skin of an aircraft.

I don't agree. I have seen all the pics of PAF JF-17 / F-16s on CAP with fuel tanks. More so with Interceptors such as Mig 21.

@kursed @Oscar @Windjammer
 
You proved it that you don't deserve the professional title ... So this conversation is over ...

Here is the investigation result of flight MH 117 of Malaysia shot by Buk SAM:

The Dutch Safety Board reported a last flight data recording at 16:20 local time (13:20 UTC), located west of the urban-type settlement Rozsypne (Розсипне), near Hrabove heading east-southeast (ESE, 115°) at 494 knots (915 km/h; 568 mph).[3]

At exactly 16:20:03 local time (13:20:03 UTC) a Buk ground-to-air missile, which had been launched from an area east from the aircraft, detonated outside the aircraft just above the cockpit to the left. An explosive decompression occurred, resulting in both the cockpit and tail sections tearing away from the middle portion of the fuselage. All three sections disintegrated as they fell rapidly towards the ground.

The majority of debris landed near Hrabove, a village located north of Torez in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast. The debris spread over a 50 square kilometres (19 sq mi) area to the southwest of Hrabove.[7]:53 The fireball on impact is believed to have been captured on video.[74] Photographs from the site of the crash show scattered pieces of broken fuselage and engine parts, bodies, and passports.[75] Some of the wreckage fell close to houses.[76] Dozens of bodies fell into crop fields, and some fell into houses.[77]

Debris floating in the air for 35,000 feet, genius.

Stick to accountancy, if you have passed your exams.

I don't agree. I have seen all the pics of PAF JF-17 / F-16s on CAP with fuel tanks. More so with Interceptors such as Mig 21.

@kursed @Oscar @Windjammer

It still does not occupy weapon points.

It is time to go to my beach party so further replies after another six hours. Unless I luck out.
 
Back
Top Bottom