What's new

5 Ways Saudi Arabia Could Crush Iran (or Any Enemy) in a War

lol with the Saudi stronk articles....

nobody takes the Saudis seriously anymore after yemen. Before that it was heavily suspected they were a joke. but they just had to go and prove it beyond doubt.

the only thing more hilarious then Saudi threats, Are dumb idiots looking up Saudi equipment on wiki and writing stronk articles about them. not even worth reading, the title is hilarious enough.
 
The only thing Saudi Arabia would be able to crush in 2-3 weeks is Iranian ariforce, apart from that the saudis cannot achieve victory in ground combat against the iranians, the saudi army is not even a professional one n lacks any experience whatsoever unlike irans army which is way more experienced in modern warfare courtesy sadams invasion of iran.
 
Saudia/UAE is 1.5 hours away from Iran , if Iran wanted 100,000 Troops can land in UAE and capture it and then land in Riyadh simultaneously
 
The Arab and Iranian people should dispose of the extremist regimes in thier countries n establish modern islamic republics focused on development n prosperity of thier people n mending rifts in the islamic world, the iranians are a little better in this regard but nevertheless both sides are contributing heavily in destroying the islamic world while our enemies clap with joy in tel aviv, washington and dehli, alone we will fall, together we will sustain, this sunni shia bullshit has gotten way out of hand....we believe in the same Allah, we adhere to the same Prophet(pbuh), we read the same quran, does the rest really matter??? In the end our enemies will win, the arabs may not have the military prowess of their fore fathers yet they are filthy rich and in case of a war they will have direct support of Us, europe and Nato hence iranians must know that in any such war they will suffer heavily and iran will be transported back into the stone age like syria or iraq and the arabs must know that iran is not as weak as syria or iraq and any such war will result in the immediate destruction of uae and much of the oil infrastructure of saudis resulting in massive, massive losses to their economy literally crippling arab economy n transporting them to the stone age, when both sides would have been utterly weakened in such a conflict, Israel will move ahead n anex large parts of both countries, why cant people wake up, why have we become so stupid, why the hell cant we be like the muslims of old, they didnt care about shia sunni, they only cared about the islamic world at large...
 
Saudia/UAE is 1.5 hours away from Iran , if Iran wanted 100,000 Troops can land in UAE and capture it and then land in Riyadh simultaneously

how will the troops get to UAE?
 
1.5 hours from Iran to uae ......in car , you can air drop 50,000 troops in matter of hours
Only 2,000 UAE citizen left rest of country is all foreigners

Saudis can't even stop Houthis riding camels and small cars
 
1.5 hours from Iran to uae ......in car , you can air drop 50,000 troops in matter of hours
Only 2,000 UAE citizen left rest of country is all foreigners

Saudis can't even stop Houthis riding camels and small cars

1. Unless you make an amphibious car, the Persian Gulf is in the way of driving.

2. 50,000 airborne troops, huh. Iran doesn't even have that many airborne forces, I don't think. Nor the means to drop them in a short amount of time.
 
In fact, all American fighters has Kill Switch ...
it not only about f35.
How come they didn't use the kill switch on the Iranian F-14 Tomcat???
 
How come they didn't use the kill switch on the Iranian F-14 Tomcat???
They sabotaged targeting system on those airplanes and it take Iran more than 1 year to fix the targeting system of the airplane.
 
They sabotaged targeting system on those airplanes and it take Iran more than 1 year to fix the targeting system of the airplane.
When? any sources will be appreciated..
 
After revolution before American personnel and advisors leave Iran and some say it was some inside job.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0077.shtml



But certainly in operation prying mantis the harpoon fired by Iranian ships very easily deflected .
I am aware of these events.. but where is the proof of Kill switches during operations?
A Harpoon deflecting from its trajectory can be done with EW..this has nothing to do with the US being able to use kill switches on sold airplanes, no one will want them if that was the case.. the US counts on its shear force; even if they sell 100 F-35s to a country that decides to go against them, they have 2000 for themselves and can make another thousand or so in no time.. they don't need kill switches per se..
 
I am aware of these events.. but where is the proof of Kill switches during operations?
A Harpoon deflecting from its trajectory can be done with EW..this has nothing to do with the US being able to use kill switches on sold airplanes, no one will want them if that was the case.. the US counts on its shear force; even if they sell 100 F-35s to a country that decides to go against them, they have 2000 for themselves and can make another thousand or so in no time.. they don't need kill switches per se..
in marinas island war France gave the kill switch for Exocet missiles to england
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/nov/22/books.france
or there is such reports
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/science/27trojan.html
 
in marinas island war France gave the kill switch for Exocet missiles to england
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/nov/22/books.france
or there is such reports
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/science/27trojan.html
Just speculations and propaganda, the Argentinians have sank a British destroyer with the Exocet missiles.. this is a well known fact..

Your second link talk about vulnerabilities faced by the US systems themselves.. nothing to do with kill switches..
 
Back
Top Bottom