What's new

World Bank Latest Report on South Asia: oct 2015

farhan_9909

PROFESSIONAL
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
8,989
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
WASHINGTON, October 4, 2015 – Led by a resilient India, South Asia is expected to maintain its lead as the fastest-growing region in the world, with economic growth forecasted to accelerate from 7 percent in 2015 to 7.4 percent in 2016, a World Bank report said.

According to the twice-a-year South Asia Economic Focus, this positive performance hinges on solid growth in services, domestic consumption, and a gradual rise of investments. Limited exposure to the financial turmoil and an improved external position have given most South Asian countries important policy space.

Given India’s weight in the region, its performance greatly influences the projections for South Asia as a whole. Improved investor sentiment and resilience to external shocks are expected to increase India’s growth rate to 7.5 percent in fiscal year (FY) 2015 and further to 7.8 percent in FY2016.

Thanks to low food and commodity prices, as well as a slowdown in the growth of administered prices, inflationary pressures have eased markedly in South Asia. Yet the pace of disinflation varies depending on the price index considered. Revisions to national accounts, together with new comparable data on purchasing power around the world, also raise questions regarding the measurement of prices in the region. According to the report, South Asia could actually have cheaper prices, faster growth and bigger economies than previously thought.

“While the region is now in a position of strength, structural constraints holding back export and investment growth do persist. To keep the momentum and accelerate job creation, governments should enact reforms easing infrastructure bottlenecks and paving the way to greater competitiveness,” World Bank South Asia Chief Economist Martin Rama said. “Fiscal space remains limited while financial sector vulnerabilities persist.”

Rapid growth has not yet translated into significantly higher government revenue generation and improved fiscal balances. Budget deficits are expected to remain at 6.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2015, the highest among all developing regions. Tax collection remains well below estimates, and has even deteriorated across major South Asian economies.

Mobilizing revenue is critical for the region to develop its infrastructure and deliver better social services, while creating a financial cushion to address potential shocks in the future,” said Annette Dixon, World Bank South Asia Vice President. “In some cases introducing and rolling out modern tax instruments holds the key to higher revenue, but containing exemptions and special regimes are crucial across most of the region.”

Factsheet: Most South Asian Countries Show Potential to Accelerate Growth

Many South Asian countries show potential for accelerated growth in the short to medium term. However, the transition in Afghanistan, the earthquakes in Nepal, and revisions to national accounts in Sri Lanka, have resulted in all three countries experiencing slower growth than previously expected.

SAEF-Growth.jpg

In Afghanistan, the political and security transitions have led to a weaker outlook, with growth estimated at 1.9 percent for 2015. Fiscal vulnerabilities remain high and will require a large revenue effort and sustained levels of aid. Future prospects hinge critically on improvements in security and forceful implementation of reforms.


Bangladesh has seen an increase in domestic economic activity since April 2015. GDP is expected to grow by 6.5 percent in 2015 and next year, supported by healthy agricultural production along with a recovery in services and domestic demand. But instability, depressed export growth, an only modest rebound in remittances, and continued weakness in private sector credit growth, remain matters for concern.

Economic activity in Bhutan is expected to gain momentum with real GDP growing at 6.7 percent in 2015. This solid performance is driven by new hydropower construction and innovative tourism measures, such as “Visit Bhutan 2015.” Private sector development is key to reduce the country’s vulnerability to donor finance and address rising youth unemployment.

In India, GDP growth is expected to accelerate to 7.5 percent this year and 7.8 percent in 2016 lifted by cheap oil prices and limited exposure to the global financial turmoil. However, delays in the adoption and implementation of key reforms could affect investor sentiment. A weak trade performance and financial sector vulnerabilities could also hold back GDP growth.

In Maldives, economic growth continued its recovery from the 2012 dip, and inflation has slowed down, but the economy remains undiversified, primarily depending on tourism and fisheries. Growth is expected to be 5.0 percent in 2015 and 3.9 percent in 2016.

Nepal has begun to recover after the loss of life and economic devastation from the April and May earthquakes. From an expected 5 percent, GDP growth is expected to drop to 3.4 percent this year and to tick up to 3.7 percent in 2016. Although macroeconomic fundamentals remain strong, weak execution of public investment slows down both infrastructure development and post-disaster reconstruction.

In Pakistan, gradual recovery to around 4.5 percent growth by 2016 is aided by low inflation and fiscal consolidation. Increases in remittances and stable agricultural performance contribute to this outcome. But further acceleration requires tackling pervasive power cuts, a cumbersome business environment, and low access to finance.

In Sri Lanka, growth is expected to increase to 5.6 percent in 2016 due to higher public sector wages and higher disposable incomes. However, the looser fiscal stance behind this strong domestic demand is also putting pressure on the external balance. Maintaining the growth momentum will require higher tax revenue, rationalized public spending and greater competitiveness.

South Asia Grows Strongly but Fiscal, Financial Weaknesses Remain
 
very poor performance by Pakistan,we should had made it to atleast 4.8% last year.

Anything below 5% this year,the govt has failed.
 
Low oil prices and low inflation have become boom for Indian economy. It is time Modi start his reforms especially GST and land bill. According to some estimates GST alone will boost Indian growth rate by 1% more
 
Bangladesh can substain this growth rate for a long time if their is no political problems. Current gov is doing a great job.
 
bangladesh-foreign-exchange-reserves.png

Bangladesh is simply playing it safe - much safer than India or Pakistan who take in much larger risks.

Debt to GDP ratio in Bangladesh is 18% - whereas it is around 65% in India and Pakistan. Macroeconomic policy is very conservative here.

IMHO Bangladesh Govt. should start spending generously in massive infrastructure projects (ports, airports, public transit, power generation projects etc.) without delay. Current infrastructure dates from the sixties/seventies and is largely inadequate.

Progress of building new infrastructure is quite slow. However infrastructure development is uniform across the board in all areas of the country unlike some neighboring countries owing to NGO/Govt. activities as well as a smaller area.
 
Last edited:
IMHO Bangladesh Govt. should start spending generously in massive infrastructure projects (ports, airports, public transit, power generation projects etc.) without delay. Current infrastructure dates from the sixties/seventies and is largely inadequate.

As I understand, corruption is also rampant in BD like in most of South Asia. Point is that without transparency and a clear vision of future, taking on more debt will only serve to fill the pockets of already rich. So as an average man 18% debt to GDP ration seems fantastic.

Our finance minister announced another major victory last week when he managed to get yet another $ 500 million loan with 8.5% interest rate, to payback a previous loan.
 
bangladesh-foreign-exchange-reserves.png

Bangladesh is simply playing it safe - much safer than India or Pakistan who take in much larger risks.

Debt to GDP ratio in Bangladesh is 18% - whereas it is around 65% in India and Pakistan. Macroeconomic policy is very conservative here.

IMHO Bangladesh Govt. should start spending generously in massive infrastructure projects (ports, airports, public transit, power generation projects etc.) without delay. Current infrastructure dates from the sixties/seventies and is largely inadequate.

Progress of building new infrastructure is quite slow. However infrastructure development is uniform across the board in all areas of the country unlike some neighboring countries owing to NGO/Govt. activities as well as a smaller area.
To tell you honestly to a certain limit you're right. But you need to develope infrastructure. This will give you enough more fast paced developement. Since this investments are inside your country. So no need to worry about foriegn reserves.
 
very poor performance by Pakistan,we should had made it to atleast 4.8% last year.

Anything below 5% this year,the govt has failed.

Anything below 6% growth is BAD for ANY developing economy. The opportunities are so high to create value in a developing economy, that even if 50% of the election promises are met, the growth targets would be fulfilled.

bangladesh-foreign-exchange-reserves.png

Bangladesh is simply playing it safe - much safer than India or Pakistan who take in much larger risks.

Debt to GDP ratio in Bangladesh is 18% - whereas it is around 65% in India and Pakistan. Macroeconomic policy is very conservative here.

IMHO Bangladesh Govt. should start spending generously in massive infrastructure projects (ports, airports, public transit, power generation projects etc.) without delay. Current infrastructure dates from the sixties/seventies and is largely inadequate.

Progress of building new infrastructure is quite slow. However infrastructure development is uniform across the board in all areas of the country unlike some neighboring countries owing to NGO/Govt. activities as well as a smaller area.

It depends on the extent of risk-averse perspective of the govt. Debt fundamentally is not bad. It's how you handle it is bad in most countries.

Good hard-working people use their money judiciously and spend it constructively but the smarter ones use other's money to earn their living. Read up on "Leverage" to understand what I am alluding to.
 
[QUOTE="Providence, post: 7724033, member: 165706"
It depends on the extent of risk-averse perspective of the govt. Debt fundamentally is not bad. It's how you handle it is bad in most countries.

Good hard-working people use their money judiciously and spend it constructively but the smarter ones use other's money to earn their living. Read up on "Leverage" to understand what I am alluding to.
[/QUOTE]

Depends on financial literacy, age, income, risk preference among many other factors. Leverage though important for institutions is hardly advisable for individuals.

Coming to the part about debt not being bad - agree, as long as one has assured capability to service that debt if not then Debt is Bad, Very Bad.
 
Depends on financial literacy, age, income, risk preference among many other factors. Leverage though important for institutions is hardly advisable for individuals.

Coming to the part about debt not being bad - agree, as long as one has assured capability to service that debt if not then Debt is Bad, Very Bad.

Well EVERYTHING in this world comes with a catch. Concept of leverage is no different. It is NOT a silver bullet. It will cut both ways.

You gotta be smart. No ifs and buts about it else you will get bamboozled soon !
 
Don't care what the facts and figures say. Only care about the ground realities. If the average or poor Pakistani is able to eat, get a job and is treated fairly than that is success. There is no point in having excellent economic figures and then having 40%of the world's severely malnourished and poor living in your country. Take the example of Iran. On paper, a poor nation yet the living standard of an average Iranian is comparable to that of some European nations. I know this because I have been to Iran 5 times.
 
Last edited:
Don't care what the facts and figures say. Only care about the ground realities. If the average or poor Pakistani is able to eat, get a job and is treated fairly than that is success. There is no point in having excellent economic figures and then having 40%of the world's severely malnourished and poor living in your country. Take the example of Iran. On paper, a poor nation yet the living standard of an average Iranian is comparable to that of European nations. I know because I have been to Iran 5 times.

Well such mismatches are not inbuilt in statistics but in effectively measuring it. So world bank is not at fault. It's the member countries who should get their acts right !
 
Well such mismatches are not inbuilt in statistics but in effectively measuring it. So world bank is not at fault. It's the member countries who should get their acts right !

Precisely, there should be a consistent and universal method to measure such data. It needs protection from certain nations and societies that are prone to telling lies, half-truths and false notions.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom