What's new

Why the F-16 Is Such a Badass Plane

dexter

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
6,111
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Why the F-16 Is Such a Badass Plane
This lightweight, multi-role fighter can be found in air forces throughout the world—and for good reason.

BY ERIC TEGLER
JUL 11, 2021

When U.S. Air Force Captain Gary “Nordo” North took off as leader of a flight of four F-16s on a December morning in 1992, the Fighting Falcon was already a globally respected—and feared—fighter. By then, more than 2,500 F-16s had been delivered worldwide, amassing nearly 5 million flight hours.
But that Sunday morning, North cared only about the two-seat F-16D he was flying, and the three others from his “Top Hats” 310th Fighter Squadron. They were aloft on the border of southern Iraq as part of Operation Southern Watch, patrolling the no-fly zone that the U.S., U.K., and France had established following the Gulf War.
As the flight met up with a KC-135 tanker, North and his backseater in “Benji 41” (the F-16D’s call sign) heard intense communications between another flight of four F-15 Eagles and an E-3 AWACS airborne control aircraft. An Iraqi Air Force (IQAF) MiG-25 Foxbat had crossed into the no-fly zone, baited the Americans, and hustled back north at supersonic speed with the F-15s in chase.
In full afterburner, the Eagles quickly exhausted their fuel and were forced to leave. That left Nordo’s F-16s as the go-to American fighters in the area. As described in Craig Brown’s Debrief: A Complete History of U.S. Aerial Engagements, North and his wingman cut their refueling short, taking on only enough gas to cover their assigned patrol time and leaving the two remaining Top Hats to fully refuel.

“SOMEONE WAS GOING TO DIE WITHIN THE NEXT TWO MINUTES…AND IT WASN’T GOING TO BE ME OR MY WINGMAN.”

Almost immediately, AWACS controllers vectored the pair of F-16s toward another Iraqi MiG heading for the no-fly zone, which quickly turned back north. In quick succession, the E-3 picked up two more Iraqi fighters. Each time North’s F-16s turned toward them, they turned away from the no-fly zone. But a third, entering the zone 30 miles west at 30,000 feet, kept flying east—straight toward Benji 41.
While the other two F-16s scrambled to the area from the tanker, Nordo lit his afterburner, turning his jet and his wingman north to trap the MiG south of them in the no-fly zone. The IQAF fighter couldn’t flee back to Iraqi territory without a fight.
“Someone was going to die within the next two minutes,” North recalled, “and it wasn’t going to be me or my wingman.”
In addition to two short-range AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles, Benji 41 was carrying a pair of AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAMs) on its wingtips. North visually picked up the MiG-25 eight miles off his nose. Calling the E-3 for clearance to fire, he also told his wingman to go active with his electronic jamming pod. A long 15 seconds later, North heard Cleared to kill, cleared to kill, Bandit, Bandit! from the AWACS controller.

Nordo fired an AIM-120, callingFox! as it came off his wingtip. The AMRAAM closed on the MiG-25 at Mach 4, shattering it into three large pieces and a fireball in seconds. Diving in afterburner, North and his wingman scooted south at top speed.
Despite almost two decades of service, North’s was the first aerial kill for an American F-16.

THE LIGHTWEIGHT

1626122694240.png

An illustration of the YF-16, published in the November 1975 issue of Popular Mechanics.

As with every fourth-generation U.S. fighter, the F-16 was defined by the Air Force’s experience in Vietnam. In the late 1960s, former Air Force fighter pilot Colonel John Boyd and a group of fighter technology analysts known as “the Fighter Mafia” called for development of a highly maneuverable, lightweight fighter aircraft that would be an alternative to heavy, complex fighters like the F-4 Phantom, F-14 Tomcat, and F-15 Eagle—some of which were still in design stages.
This idea gained funding and quickly evolved into the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program. In February 1972, six manufacturers submitted design proposals, all based on two prime considerations: turning radius and acceleration.
Two months later, the General Dynamics Model 401-16B and the Northrop P-600 were chosen for development and a 300-hour fly-off at Edwards Air Force Base in California. Known as YF-16 and YF-17, the prototypes both weighed in at about 20,000 pounds empty, which was relatively light compared with the 28,000-pound F-15 and the 40,000-pound F-14.
A team including General Dynamics chief designer Harry Hillaker rolled the YF-16 out in December 1973, just 21 months after the development contract was placed. The diminutive, largely aluminum single-engine design incorporated a cropped delta wing blended with the fuselage body. Forward wing strakes, an underslung intake, and aft underbody ventral fins contributed to a dynamically unstable configuration, controlled by the world’s first fly-by-wire production flight control system.

1626122752503.png

The General Dynamics YF-16, left, and Northrop YF-17, right. Though the YF-16 won out, Northrop’s plane became the basis for the F/A-18.

Combined with a 23,840-pound-thrust Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-100 afterburning turbofan, the purposely unstable design offered a 1.4-to-1 thrust-to-weight ratio, eyeball-popping 9G maneuver capability, and exceptional pilot visibility under a frameless bubble canopy.
But the YF-16 still needed to provide itself against Northrop’s competition. After 10 months of testing, it was clear that the YF-16 had significantly better maneuverability, a longer range, and a lower cost than the YF-17. In January 1975, the Air Force pronounced it the winner of the competition and said Uncle Sam would buy at least 650 of them. But the YF-17 didn’t disappear into obscurity; it would go on to form the bones for the U.S. Navy’s future F/A-18 Hornet.

THE F-16 REACHES FIGHTER FAME

1626122767404.png


Despite its initial lightweight, day-fighter emphasis, the F-16 would immediately develop into a multi-role fighter-bomber. As the LWF was underway, NATO allies Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway were on the lookout for a replacement for their Lockheed F-104G Starfighter fighter-bombers. The similarly sized, single-engine YF-16 fit perfectly.

The USAF was also looking to cost-effectively replace the fighter-bomber capabilities of its F-105s and F-4s with an aircraft that could mix with the air-superiority-focused F-15. These imperatives drove changes to the first production F-16s, which included a longer fuselage (by 10.6 inches), increased wing area, larger ventral fins, and two more underwing weapons stations. A larger nose radome also accommodated a Westinghouse AN/APG-66 radar. As a result, weight was increased by 25 percent over the YF-16.
The U.S. Air Force accepted its first production F-16A in January 1979. The 34th Tactical Fighter Squadron became the first unit to fly the F-16, which was officially named “Fighting Falcon” in July 1980. By that time, two European production lines had been started and the Belgian, Royal Netherlands, and Norwegian air forces began receiving F-16As. So did the Israelis.
The Israeli Air Force (IAF) called the F-16 “Netz” (Hawk) and threw it into combat less than a year after taking delivery. In July 1981, the IAF launched Operation Opera, which saw eight F-16As, each carrying two unguided 2,000-pound bombs, boldly fly into Iraq escorted by six IAF F-15As, where they struck a nuclear reactor.

1626122793234.png

The F-16 at the the Air and Space Museum in Le Bourget, France, June 2, 1977.

The Fighting Falcon’s first aerial victories came courtesy of the IAF in April 1982 when a Netz shot down a Syrian Air Force MiG-23. That June, Israeli F-16s took on more Syrian MiGs during the conflict in Lebanon, ultimately being credited with 44 kills.
Its early success in combat combined with its relatively low cost and versatility made the F-16 a hot seller. By May 1982, Venezuela was already the 10th Fighting Falcon customer. In April, 1983, the USAF Thunderbirds demonstration team flew its first public air show with F-16s.
From Turkey to Thailand, the F-16 was in high demand. Today this fighter is or has been operated by 25 countries and 4,588 have been built, making the F-16 the second most produced American supersonic jet fighter after the F-4 Phantom. According to Lockheed Martin, there have been 10 production blocks of the F-16, from Block 1 in 1979 to the latest Block 70/72, generically known as the F-16V. Between countries, blocks, and models, a total of 139 versions of the jet have been produced over the past four decades.

THE VIPER AND THE WEASEL

1626122822378.png

Illustration of F-16A fighter jets during Operation Desert Storm.

Over the decades, the F-16 has unofficially been referred to as “the Viper.” The name was given it by early F-16 pilots at Hill Air Force Base in Utah, reportedly referring to its look before takeoff or to spacecraft in the popular late-’70s sci-fi series Battlestar Galactica.
Retired USAF Lieutenant Colonel Dan Hampton remembers the first time he saw an F-16 up close. After graduating from flight school in 1987, Hampton went to Luke Air Force Base in Arizona to transition to the Viper. He showed up on a Saturday when things were slow.
“I remember dropping my stuff off in the visiting officers’ quarters and driving over to the squadron. Nobody was around. I got out on the flight line and walked up to an airplane. It was the first time I’d actually seen an F-16 up close. I couldn’t even get in it, but I was thrilled.”
After training in the F-16A, which Hampton and fellow pilots called “coal burners” because of their age and early F100 engines, he went to his first operational unit at Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany to learn the SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) mission, basically taking out enemy surface-to-air missile (SAM) sites, using the F-16C. The Air Force called these missions and the aircraft that flew them “Wild Weasels.”

1626122859997.png

An F-16C from Luke Air Force Base in Arizona flies over Monument Valley.

Hampton would go on to fly 151 Wild Weasel sorties in the Viper during both Gulf Wars, becoming one of the most decorated Air Force pilots since the Vietnam War. The F-16, he says, was and is an ideal Wild Weasel platform owing to its small size (which makes it hard to spot on radar or visually), its modular design (making upgrades easy), and its agility.
“The great thing about the Viper…was that you could do the air-to-air fight on your way into and out of the target area,” Hampton says. “In the second Gulf War, they sent all the [F-15C] Eagles home after the first 10 days. They weren’t needed because we were there.”
On one Wild Weasel sortie near Baghdad, which Hampton describes in his book Viper Pilot, he and his wingman were diverted from SAM killing to intercept Iraqi helicopters attempting to spirit Saddam Hussein away from U.S. forces. The two F-16s rolled in through a cloud break “with everything in Baghdad shooting at us” and dropping cluster bombs on nearby anti-aircraft sites.
“When we found the helicopters, we hit one with a Maverick [air-to-ground missile], strafed a couple more, and my wingman put an AIM-9 [Sidewinder] into one,” Hampton told Popular Mechanics. “The helo was about to lift off and my wingman didn’t have any other ordnance left, so he shot the Sidewinder at him. There were missions where we used everything we had.”

THE FUTURE OF THE F-16

1626122891770.png

A UAE Air Force F-16 takes off from Andravida, Greece, April 19, 2021.

F-16 production is still going strong at the plant in Greenville, South Carolina, owned by Lockheed Martin, which acquired General Dynamics’ aircraft business in 1993. Right now, there’s a 128-jet backlog for the latest Block 70/72 version ordered by five nations.
Among those nations is Taiwan, which will put F-16Vs to vital use facing China across the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan’s new Block 70 Vipers will leverage advanced scanned-array radars, more powerful General Electric F110-GE-132 engines, and AGM-158C long-range anti-ship missiles to dissuade China.

With the U.S. Air Force extending the lives of its older F-16s to 12,000 flight hours, the aircraft could possibly serve into the late 2030s. And the USAF’s recently muted desire for a non-stealthy Multi-Role Fighter (MR-X) to replace many of its Vipers could see it revisit the aborted delta-wing F-16XL, among other designs.
For the present, F-16s around the world will add to the more than 19 million flight hours flown by the type to date. But with all its abilities, its best feature is also its most important one—taking care of its pilots.

“It’s a great airplane,” Hampton says. “It always brought me home alive and I’m grateful for that.”

Source:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a36945512/f-16-history/https://hmg-h-cdn.hearstapps.com/videos/f16lead2-mp4-1625603282.mp4
 
Last edited:
F16 gained the reputation on the back of the superb records of USA and Israel in the previous 2 decsdes.

Mostly kills on outdated migs when the F16 had force multipliers AWACS better radar better BVRS and overall superior situational awareness.

Check the records the kills are mig19 mig21 mig23 su7

There are no a very few MIG29 mirage2000 or flankers AND no chance of modern euro canards

Even the PAF flanker kill was ficticious no proof,

In 21st Century F16 is not more bad *** then Gripen Typhoon Rafale even J10C
 
F16 gained the reputation on the back of the superb records of USA and Israel in the previous 2 decsdes.

Mostly kills on outdated migs when the F16 had force multipliers AWACS better radar better BVRS and overall superior situational awareness.

Check the records the kills are mig19 mig21 mig23 su7

There are no a very few MIG29 mirage2000 or flankers AND no chance of modern euro canards

Even the PAF flanker kill was ficticious no proof,

In 21st Century F16 is not more bad *** then Gripen Typhoon Rafale even J10C
Can I get an order of extra-extra-extra large fries? The salt here is overwhelming.
 
F16 gained the reputation on the back of the superb records of USA and Israel in the previous 2 decsdes.

Mostly kills on outdated migs when the F16 had force multipliers AWACS better radar better BVRS and overall superior situational awareness.


Check the records the kills are mig19 mig21 mig23 su7

There are no a very few MIG29 mirage2000 or flankers AND no chance of modern euro canards

Even the PAF flanker kill was ficticious no proof,

In 21st Century F16 is not more bad *** then Gripen Typhoon Rafale even J10C
You forgot that Pakistan took it to war before USA did. In order the reputation should be written out as Israel, Pakistan and then USA.

War and aerial combat is never about fairness. It is in the job of the fighter pilot to make his bandit die for their own respective country. And if they have force multipliers to their advantage so be it. Chaff clouds over Kashmir did do the trick a few years back.

Viper has a kill against a MiG-29 in the 90s.

The PAF Flanker kill is still a claim. India will deny it naturally. Raytheon USA may say otherwise.

Cheers !!!
 
F16 gained the reputation on the back of the superb records of USA and Israel in the previous 2 decsdes.

Mostly kills on outdated migs when the F16 had force multipliers AWACS better radar better BVRS and overall superior situational awareness.

Check the records the kills are mig19 mig21 mig23 su7

There are no a very few MIG29 mirage2000 or flankers AND no chance of modern euro canards

Even the PAF flanker kill was ficticious no proof,

In 21st Century F16 is not more bad *** then Gripen Typhoon Rafale even J10C
Oh I'm sure the SU-30, MiG-29, Mirage-2000 and even the MiG-21, all operated by India have better record than F-16.
Since F-16 first flew almost 50 years ago and the likes of MK2s, Fulcrums and Flankers arrived on the scene much later, can you enlighten us what do all these have to show for their record....in fact all the types combined can not match the combat kills of the F-16s.
 
Why the F-16 Is Such a Badass Plane
This lightweight, multi-role fighter can be found in air forces throughout the world—and for good reason.

BY ERIC TEGLER
JUL 11, 2021

When U.S. Air Force Captain Gary “Nordo” North took off as leader of a flight of four F-16s on a December morning in 1992, the Fighting Falcon was already a globally respected—and feared—fighter. By then, more than 2,500 F-16s had been delivered worldwide, amassing nearly 5 million flight hours.
But that Sunday morning, North cared only about the two-seat F-16D he was flying, and the three others from his “Top Hats” 310th Fighter Squadron. They were aloft on the border of southern Iraq as part of Operation Southern Watch, patrolling the no-fly zone that the U.S., U.K., and France had established following the Gulf War.
As the flight met up with a KC-135 tanker, North and his backseater in “Benji 41” (the F-16D’s call sign) heard intense communications between another flight of four F-15 Eagles and an E-3 AWACS airborne control aircraft. An Iraqi Air Force (IQAF) MiG-25 Foxbat had crossed into the no-fly zone, baited the Americans, and hustled back north at supersonic speed with the F-15s in chase.
In full afterburner, the Eagles quickly exhausted their fuel and were forced to leave. That left Nordo’s F-16s as the go-to American fighters in the area. As described in Craig Brown’s Debrief: A Complete History of U.S. Aerial Engagements, North and his wingman cut their refueling short, taking on only enough gas to cover their assigned patrol time and leaving the two remaining Top Hats to fully refuel.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW


Almost immediately, AWACS controllers vectored the pair of F-16s toward another Iraqi MiG heading for the no-fly zone, which quickly turned back north. In quick succession, the E-3 picked up two more Iraqi fighters. Each time North’s F-16s turned toward them, they turned away from the no-fly zone. But a third, entering the zone 30 miles west at 30,000 feet, kept flying east—straight toward Benji 41.
While the other two F-16s scrambled to the area from the tanker, Nordo lit his afterburner, turning his jet and his wingman north to trap the MiG south of them in the no-fly zone. The IQAF fighter couldn’t flee back to Iraqi territory without a fight.
“Someone was going to die within the next two minutes,” North recalled, “and it wasn’t going to be me or my wingman.”
In addition to two short-range AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles, Benji 41 was carrying a pair of AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAMs) on its wingtips. North visually picked up the MiG-25 eight miles off his nose. Calling the E-3 for clearance to fire, he also told his wingman to go active with his electronic jamming pod. A long 15 seconds later, North heard “Cleared to kill, cleared to kill, Bandit, Bandit!” from the AWACS controller.

Nordo fired an AIM-120, calling “Fox!” as it came off his wingtip. The AMRAAM closed on the MiG-25 at Mach 4, shattering it into three large pieces and a fireball in seconds. Diving in afterburner, North and his wingman scooted south at top speed.
Despite almost two decades of service, North’s was the first aerial kill for an American F-16.

THE LIGHTWEIGHT

planes
An illustration of the YF-16, published in the November 1975 issue of Popular Mechanics.

As with every fourth-generation U.S. fighter, the F-16 was defined by the Air Force’s experience in Vietnam. In the late 1960s, former Air Force fighter pilot Colonel John Boyd and a group of fighter technology analysts known as “the Fighter Mafia” called for development of a highly maneuverable, lightweight fighter aircraft that would be an alternative to heavy, complex fighters like the F-4 Phantom, F-14 Tomcat, and F-15 Eagle—some of which were still in design stages.
This idea gained funding and quickly evolved into the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program. In February 1972, six manufacturers submitted design proposals, all based on two prime considerations: turning radius and acceleration.
Two months later, the General Dynamics Model 401-16B and the Northrop P-600 were chosen for development and a 300-hour fly-off at Edwards Air Force Base in California. Known as YF-16 and YF-17, the prototypes both weighed in at about 20,000 pounds empty, which was relatively light compared with the 28,000-pound F-15 and the 40,000-pound F-14.
A team including General Dynamics chief designer Harry Hillaker rolled the YF-16 out in December 1973, just 21 months after the development contract was placed. The diminutive, largely aluminum single-engine design incorporated a cropped delta wing blended with the fuselage body. Forward wing strakes, an underslung intake, and aft underbody ventral fins contributed to a dynamically unstable configuration, controlled by the world’s first fly-by-wire production flight control system.

the official debut of the yf 16 falcon, a prototype of the f 16 photo by © hulton deutsch collectioncorbiscorbis via getty images

The General Dynamics YF-16, left, and Northrop YF-17, right. Though the YF-16 won out, Northrop’s plane became the basis for the F/A-18.

Combined with a 23,840-pound-thrust Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-100 afterburning turbofan, the purposely unstable design offered a 1.4-to-1 thrust-to-weight ratio, eyeball-popping 9G maneuver capability, and exceptional pilot visibility under a frameless bubble canopy.
But the YF-16 still needed to provide itself against Northrop’s competition. After 10 months of testing, it was clear that the YF-16 had significantly better maneuverability, a longer range, and a lower cost than the YF-17. In January 1975, the Air Force pronounced it the winner of the competition and said Uncle Sam would buy at least 650 of them. But the YF-17 didn’t disappear into obscurity; it would go on to form the bones for the U.S. Navy’s future F/A-18 Hornet.

THE F-16 REACHES FIGHTER FAME

original caption edwards afb, ca general dynamics f 16 air combat fighter prototype shows its classic lines at a recent test flight at edwards air force base, ca the f 16 has been chosen by the us air force for full scale development as this country's new air combat fighter, following an intensive, 10 month evaluation and selection process which included more than 330 flights print shows profile of the f 16 in flight's new air combat fighter, following an intensive, 10 month evaluation and selection process which included more than 330 flights print shows profile of the f 16 in flight


Despite its initial lightweight, day-fighter emphasis, the F-16 would immediately develop into a multi-role fighter-bomber. As the LWF was underway, NATO allies Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway were on the lookout for a replacement for their Lockheed F-104G Starfighter fighter-bombers. The similarly sized, single-engine YF-16 fit perfectly.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The USAF was also looking to cost-effectively replace the fighter-bomber capabilities of its F-105s and F-4s with an aircraft that could mix with the air-superiority-focused F-15. These imperatives drove changes to the first production F-16s, which included a longer fuselage (by 10.6 inches), increased wing area, larger ventral fins, and two more underwing weapons stations. A larger nose radome also accommodated a Westinghouse AN/APG-66 radar. As a result, weight was increased by 25 percent over the YF-16.
The U.S. Air Force accepted its first production F-16A in January 1979. The 34th Tactical Fighter Squadron became the first unit to fly the F-16, which was officially named “Fighting Falcon” in July 1980. By that time, two European production lines had been started and the Belgian, Royal Netherlands, and Norwegian air forces began receiving F-16As. So did the Israelis.
The Israeli Air Force (IAF) called the F-16 “Netz” (Hawk) and threw it into combat less than a year after taking delivery. In July 1981, the IAF launched Operation Opera, which saw eight F-16As, each carrying two unguided 2,000-pound bombs, boldly fly into Iraq escorted by six IAF F-15As, where they struck a nuclear reactor.

avion de chasse f 16 lors du 32ème salon de l'aéronautique et de l'espace au bourget le 2 juin 1977, france photo by gilbert uzangamma rapho via getty images'aéronautique et de l'espace au bourget le 2 juin 1977, france photo by gilbert uzangamma rapho via getty images

The F-16 at the the Air and Space Museum in Le Bourget, France, June 2, 1977.


The Fighting Falcon’s first aerial victories came courtesy of the IAF in April 1982 when a Netz shot down a Syrian Air Force MiG-23. That June, Israeli F-16s took on more Syrian MiGs during the conflict in Lebanon, ultimately being credited with 44 kills.
Its early success in combat combined with its relatively low cost and versatility made the F-16 a hot seller. By May 1982, Venezuela was already the 10th Fighting Falcon customer. In April, 1983, the USAF Thunderbirds demonstration team flew its first public air show with F-16s.
From Turkey to Thailand, the F-16 was in high demand. Today this fighter is or has been operated by 25 countries and 4,588 have been built, making the F-16 the second most produced American supersonic jet fighter after the F-4 Phantom. According to Lockheed Martin, there have been 10 production blocks of the F-16, from Block 1 in 1979 to the latest Block 70/72, generically known as the F-16V. Between countries, blocks, and models, a total of 139 versions of the jet have been produced over the past four decades.

THE VIPER AND THE WEASEL

the swamp foxes, american f16a fighter jets take out fleeing iraqi tanks the air national guard in desert storm, iraq and kuwait, february 5, 1991 oil on canvas, by david poole, 1992 photo by vcg wilsoncorbis via getty images

Illustration of F-16A fighter jets during Operation Desert Storm.

Over the decades, the F-16 has unofficially been referred to as “the Viper.” The name was given it by early F-16 pilots at Hill Air Force Base in Utah, reportedly referring to its look before takeoff or to spacecraft in the popular late-’70s sci-fi series Battlestar Galactica.
Retired USAF Lieutenant Colonel Dan Hampton remembers the first time he saw an F-16 up close. After graduating from flight school in 1987, Hampton went to Luke Air Force Base in Arizona to transition to the Viper. He showed up on a Saturday when things were slow.
“I remember dropping my stuff off in the visiting officers’ quarters and driving over to the squadron. Nobody was around. I got out on the flight line and walked up to an airplane. It was the first time I’d actually seen an F-16 up close. I couldn’t even get in it, but I was thrilled.”
After training in the F-16A, which Hampton and fellow pilots called “coal burners” because of their age and early F100 engines, he went to his first operational unit at Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany to learn the SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) mission, basically taking out enemy surface-to-air missile (SAM) sites, using the F-16C. The Air Force called these missions and the aircraft that flew them “Wild Weasels.”

f 16c from luke afb az flies a training mission over monument valley in northern arizona januar

An F-16C from Luke Air Force Base in Arizona flies over Monument Valley.

Hampton would go on to fly 151 Wild Weasel sorties in the Viper during both Gulf Wars, becoming one of the most decorated Air Force pilots since the Vietnam War. The F-16, he says, was and is an ideal Wild Weasel platform owing to its small size (which makes it hard to spot on radar or visually), its modular design (making upgrades easy), and its agility.
“The great thing about the Viper…was that you could do the air-to-air fight on your way into and out of the target area,” Hampton says. “In the second Gulf War, they sent all the [F-15C] Eagles home after the first 10 days. They weren’t needed because we were there.”
On one Wild Weasel sortie near Baghdad, which Hampton describes in his book Viper Pilot, he and his wingman were diverted from SAM killing to intercept Iraqi helicopters attempting to spirit Saddam Hussein away from U.S. forces. The two F-16s rolled in through a cloud break “with everything in Baghdad shooting at us” and dropping cluster bombs on nearby anti-aircraft sites.
“When we found the helicopters, we hit one with a Maverick [air-to-ground missile], strafed a couple more, and my wingman put an AIM-9 [Sidewinder] into one,” Hampton told Popular Mechanics. “The helo was about to lift off and my wingman didn’t have any other ordnance left, so he shot the Sidewinder at him. There were missions where we used everything we had.”

THE FUTURE OF THE F-16

f 16

A UAE Air Force F-16 takes off from Andravida, Greece, April 19, 2021.
ARIS MESSINISGETTY IMAGES

F-16 production is still going strong at the plant in Greenville, South Carolina, owned by Lockheed Martin, which acquired General Dynamics’ aircraft business in 1993. Right now, there’s a 128-jet backlog for the latest Block 70/72 version ordered by five nations.
Among those nations is Taiwan, which will put F-16Vs to vital use facing China across the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan’s new Block 70 Vipers will leverage advanced scanned-array radars, more powerful General Electric F110-GE-132 engines, and AGM-158C long-range anti-ship missiles to dissuade China.

With the U.S. Air Force extending the lives of its older F-16s to 12,000 flight hours, the aircraft could possibly serve into the late 2030s. And the USAF’s recently muted desire for a non-stealthy Multi-Role Fighter (MR-X) to replace many of its Vipers could see it revisit the aborted delta-wing F-16XL, among other designs.
For the present, F-16s around the world will add to the more than 19 million flight hours flown by the type to date. But with all its abilities, its best feature is also its most important one—taking care of its pilots.

Source: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a36945512/f-16-history/
May be. But the chapter is almost closed in PAF's book. Unless some miracle happens and yanks come to their senses after finding no other way to get a toehold in this region. But then again, is it worth getting these planes along with the stranglehold that comes in with these planes? IMHO, it's better for Pakistan to move ahead along JF-17 path for a medium weight plane.
 
Still the SU30 MKI Kill is not mentioned.

Air-to-air kills – Air-to-air losses – Losses to ground fire

Aircraft which were destroyed on the ground are not included in this analysis, because any plane can get destroyed on the ground no matter how good it or its pilot is.

F-16 Falcon 76-1-5
Gulf War (USA) 0-0-3
No-Fly Zones (USA) 2-0-0
Bosnia (USA) 4-0-1
Kosovo (USA) 1-0-1
Kosovo (Netherlands) 1-0-0
Kosovo (Portugal, Belgium, Denmark, Turkey) 0-0-0
Afghanistan (USA, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway) 0-0-0
Iraq (USA) 0-0-0
Syrian border clashes 1979-1986 (Israel) 6-0-0
Operation Opera (Israel) 0-0-0
Lebanon War (1982) (Israel) 44-0-0
Lebanon War (2006) (Israel) 3-0-0
Intifada (2000-present) (Israel) 0-0-0
Soviet-Afghan War (Pakistan) 10-0-0
Border clashes (Pakistan) 1-0-0
Kargil War (Pakistan) 0-0-0
Northwest border wars (Pakistan) 0-0-0
Aegean Sea clashes (Turkey) 1-1-0
Venezuelan Coup 1992 (Venezuela) 3-0-0
 
It's good against obsolete MiG-25 but MiG-31 would eat it alive.
LOL :lol: :lol: in close combat F 16 eat both because of both Mig25/Mig31 have minimal agility and as for BVR F 16 has better ECM/EW than both jets

and last Mig25 had been retired long ago
F-16 was good for its time but now there are so many planes that can eat it alive. Su-35 for example.
Su 35 has big RCS than F 16, F 16V has a better capability than so called GOD Su 35, Su 35 still Using PESA but F 16 using AESA, AESA is more advance than PESA on Su35 lol
 

Back
Top Bottom