What's new

why not Come under US-Nuclear Umbrella ?

they can ... if you put nukes away ..
their AF is equal if not more powerful than you ....

I dont think so.Their AF is slightly inferior than us.And would completely outgunned once we induct the Dassault Rafale.
 
Pakistan can also provide a hired force for US actions. What is to say the same German model cannot be followed by PA ?

Pakistan can also add a pressure front against China - before you start on Pakistan loves China, know that a society can be made to hate or love another country in less than a decade of focused effort and propaganda.

Only if that effort is going to bear fruit. What if in a decade Iran return to the US camp.. with Iran.. the US has little need for Pakistan.
 
The USA only intervenes knowing the suicidal tendency of Pakistani nukes. If nukes are not there, they won't give a damn.
And building a conventional superiority to India would require at least 10-20 times more resources than building nukes.

A single nuke can kill millions. Do you know how much conventional ammunition you need to do the same level of killings?

bhai ... do you really think we would go for a full scale war with india ?? and who is talking about gaining superiorty over India in Conventional weapons , but adding some 100+ f-16 blk 52 , or maybe some F-15s ' along with Ex US naval ships can make sure that india will not attack us ...
Nuke war is not happening at least not in our life time
 
Pakistan can also provide a hired force for US actions. What is to say the same German model cannot be followed by PA ?

Pakistan can also add a pressure front against China - before you start on Pakistan loves China, know that a society can be made to hate or love another country in less than a decade of focused effort and propaganda.

we are not capable of doing the work of Germany for US ...
at least not right now ...
 
Only if that effort is going to bear fruit. What if in a decade Iran return to the US camp.. with Iran.. the US has little need for Pakistan.
Because US will always need a hedge against India becoming too big.

They want an India to be just the right amount of powerful - enough to deter China, not enough to assert itself globally. Pakistan is a god send for that goal if Pakistan is boosted externally. Earlier US used Pakistan for this purpose, now China uses it.

And since India is rising steadily, US will like nothing more than to have an India that is in a South Asian straitjacket with the occasional force needed to remind China that they cant steamroll everyone.

Or the case should be that Russia, China and India ever start forming strong alliances - it would be extremely worrying for the US.
 
Only if that effort is going to bear fruit. What if in a decade Iran return to the US camp.. with Iran.. the US has little need for Pakistan.

why you think Iran will sit on US lap ? after working decades on their Nuclear program , they wont let it go just like that ...
and so far i dont see any love relationship between Iran and Israel ... no peace with Israel means no Iran US deal
 
bhai ... do you really think we would go for a full scale war with india ?? and who is talking about gaining superiorty over India in Conventional weapons , but adding some 100+ f-16 blk 52 , or maybe some F-15s ' along with Ex US naval ships can make sure that india will not attack us ...
Nuke war is not happening at least not in our life time

100 blk 52 will cost a lot of money..
 
Because US will always need a hedge against India becoming too big.

They want an India to be just the right amount of powerful - enough to deter China, not enough to assert itself globally. Pakistan is a god send for that goal if Pakistan is boosted externally. Earlier US used Pakistan for this purpose, now China uses it.

And since India is rising steadily, US will like nothing more than to have an India that is in a South Asian straitjacket with the occasional force needed to remind China that they cant steamroll everyone.

Or the case should be that Russia, China and India ever start forming strong alliances - it would be extremely worrying for the US.

Alright, fair enough. But what if that check is provided by China in general? Keeping India under a mirror of its "Tea Party" ideals only helps the US make sure India takes decisions where its immediate business lies and not what may benefit the nation 10-20 years down the line. Eventually, MNCs moving most of Indian foreign policy may end up being the reality of American influence on India.
 
100 blk 52 will cost a lot of money..

i know that ... that is why i mentioned in OP that , on condition of economic corridor , more trade and any possible help in putting our economy back to its feet ... better economy means more $$$ and more weapons ..
a lot of amount of our Armed forces budget go to our Strategic command forces , which is for now close to useless ..
 
Then you are a very poor judge of Air power.

How can it be?
I said it is 'only slightly inferior' and surely they can manage to close that gap for now.But once we inducted for 126 fighters I dont think so.
 
we are not capable of doing the work of Germany for US ...
at least not right now ...
Doesnt take long to take you there.
US military and civilian aid starts flowing in and Pakistan will be putting up 8% growth rate for over a decade consistently. That has always been the key for Pakistani dictators to boost the economy to compete with India.

You feel Pakistan is not capable of doing the work of Germany for US, but empirical evidence of Pakistan itself suggests otherwise. You can if you need external support.
 
No more Umbrellas of any Super Power, we lost East Pakistan while we where in Super Power's Umbrella. Pakistan should strengthen its own economy and defense, self reliance should be our aim and objective, we have to reduce foreign assistance and purchases of weapons step by step and bring it to minimum.
 
Back
Top Bottom