What's new

Why is Pakistan reconsidering its role in the Islamic Military Alliance

GlobalVillageSpace

Media Partner
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Why is Pakistan reconsidering its role in the Islamic Military Alliance
Global Village Space |


Saad Yousaf |

Reports are coming in that Pakistan is drawing red lines for its participation in Saudi-led IMAFT alliance after the US-Islamic summit. The US-Islamic summit gave the impression, mainly through President Donald Trump’s speech, that this alliance would be anti-Iran first and then anti-terrorism.

After the US-Islamic summit, cracks started appearing within the GCC as well, with Qatar’s Emir giving statements criticizing the assertion emphasized at the summit and in return Saudi Arabia banning Qatar’s Al-Jazeera channel.

Read more: Pakistan Govt. rethinking red lines over the military alliance after Saudi Summit

Iran and then terrorism
At the moment Pakistan faces an obdurate India on the east and an antagonistic Kabul regime in the west. A third adversary right at the border is the last thing Pakistan wants at the moment.

Pakistan is one of the few countries in the world which has successfully crushed a full-fledged insurgency through effective counter-insurgency operations in recent past. Pakistani officials sought to be a part of the alliance as it was said to be anti-terrorism. Pakistan already imparts training to cadets of Gulf countries at its military institutions and was willing to contribute to regional peace and anti-terror efforts. It was for this reason that Gen Raheel Sharif was chosen as the Chief of IMAFT alliance as he had led a successful CT operation codenamed “Zarb-e-Azb” which flushed out TTP syndicate from FATA and thus improved security and, resultantly, the economic situation in Pakistan.

However post US-Islamic summit, it was felt among the Pakistani strategic circles that this alliance’s primary focus may not only be terrorism. Pakistan, in the past, has stated clearly that it would not become part of any alliance against Iran. Naysayers would argue that it is “policy of appeasement” towards Iran. But they are not looking at geopolitical dynamics from a Pakistani prism. Pakistan shares a 900km border with Iran. At the moment Pakistan faces an obdurate India on the east and an antagonistic Kabul regime in the west. A third adversary right at the border is the last thing Pakistan wants at the moment. Indeed, the issues of Kulbhushan Jadhav and Uzair Baloch are bones of contention and must be addressed. Iran is no angel, but declaring it an adversary in an overt manner is not in our interest.

Read more: COAS to visit Tehran: Will Pak-Iran ties take a better turn?

SCO, ECO, CPEC, and OBOR
Pakistan is in a position to act as an energy and trade corridor for GCC, Central Asia, Iran, and China.

Iran is an important regional actor which we engaged in recent past through ECO (Economic Cooperation Organization) platform which can be used to compound the effectiveness of SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization). After Pakistan and India join it as permanent members this year, SCO would include four regional nuclear powers (Pakistan, India, China, and Russia), elevating Pakistan’s regional clout and diplomatic stature among the comity of nations. Membership of SCO would enhance military-to-military partnership with Russian-led CSTO alliance and economic cooperation with the EuroAsian Economic Union (EEU). Russian ambassador to Pakistan had already stated that in the future CPEC would be integrated with EEU.

Moreover Gwadar port, the starting point of CPEC, is barely a 100km from the Iranian border. Pakistan is looking forward to being economically integrated with Euro-Asian region through CPEC and OBOR initiatives. Pakistan is in a position to act as an energy and trade corridor for GCC, Central Asia, Iran, and China. For the first time, Pakistan is about to fully utilize its tremendous geo-economic potential due to its geostrategic location as it is located at the crossroads of regions. Pakistan’s economic interests and future is tied to these aforementioned initiatives. The last thing Pakistan needs is to be embroiled in a zero-sum military confrontation (against regional state actors) which would be disastrous to the ambitious initiatives we are part of.

Read full article:

Why is Pakistan reconsidering its role in the Islamic Military Alliance
 
Pakistan has nothing to gain from containing Iran to please the Zionsts in Tel Aviv. We want to help Arabs fight ISIS not Iran.
 
Why is Pakistan reconsidering its role in the Islamic Military Alliance
Global Village Space |


Saad Yousaf |

Reports are coming in that Pakistan is drawing red lines for its participation in Saudi-led IMAFT alliance after the US-Islamic summit. The US-Islamic summit gave the impression, mainly through President Donald Trump’s speech, that this alliance would be anti-Iran first and then anti-terrorism.

After the US-Islamic summit, cracks started appearing within the GCC as well, with Qatar’s Emir giving statements criticizing the assertion emphasized at the summit and in return Saudi Arabia banning Qatar’s Al-Jazeera channel.

Read more: Pakistan Govt. rethinking red lines over the military alliance after Saudi Summit

Iran and then terrorism
At the moment Pakistan faces an obdurate India on the east and an antagonistic Kabul regime in the west. A third adversary right at the border is the last thing Pakistan wants at the moment.

Pakistan is one of the few countries in the world which has successfully crushed a full-fledged insurgency through effective counter-insurgency operations in recent past. Pakistani officials sought to be a part of the alliance as it was said to be anti-terrorism. Pakistan already imparts training to cadets of Gulf countries at its military institutions and was willing to contribute to regional peace and anti-terror efforts. It was for this reason that Gen Raheel Sharif was chosen as the Chief of IMAFT alliance as he had led a successful CT operation codenamed “Zarb-e-Azb” which flushed out TTP syndicate from FATA and thus improved security and, resultantly, the economic situation in Pakistan.

However post US-Islamic summit, it was felt among the Pakistani strategic circles that this alliance’s primary focus may not only be terrorism. Pakistan, in the past, has stated clearly that it would not become part of any alliance against Iran. Naysayers would argue that it is “policy of appeasement” towards Iran. But they are not looking at geopolitical dynamics from a Pakistani prism. Pakistan shares a 900km border with Iran. At the moment Pakistan faces an obdurate India on the east and an antagonistic Kabul regime in the west. A third adversary right at the border is the last thing Pakistan wants at the moment. Indeed, the issues of Kulbhushan Jadhav and Uzair Baloch are bones of contention and must be addressed. Iran is no angel, but declaring it an adversary in an overt manner is not in our interest.

Read more: COAS to visit Tehran: Will Pak-Iran ties take a better turn?

SCO, ECO, CPEC, and OBOR
Pakistan is in a position to act as an energy and trade corridor for GCC, Central Asia, Iran, and China.

Iran is an important regional actor which we engaged in recent past through ECO (Economic Cooperation Organization) platform which can be used to compound the effectiveness of SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization). After Pakistan and India join it as permanent members this year, SCO would include four regional nuclear powers (Pakistan, India, China, and Russia), elevating Pakistan’s regional clout and diplomatic stature among the comity of nations. Membership of SCO would enhance military-to-military partnership with Russian-led CSTO alliance and economic cooperation with the EuroAsian Economic Union (EEU). Russian ambassador to Pakistan had already stated that in the future CPEC would be integrated with EEU.

Moreover Gwadar port, the starting point of CPEC, is barely a 100km from the Iranian border. Pakistan is looking forward to being economically integrated with Euro-Asian region through CPEC and OBOR initiatives. Pakistan is in a position to act as an energy and trade corridor for GCC, Central Asia, Iran, and China. For the first time, Pakistan is about to fully utilize its tremendous geo-economic potential due to its geostrategic location as it is located at the crossroads of regions. Pakistan’s economic interests and future is tied to these aforementioned initiatives. The last thing Pakistan needs is to be embroiled in a zero-sum military confrontation (against regional state actors) which would be disastrous to the ambitious initiatives we are part of.

Read full article:

Why is Pakistan reconsidering its role in the Islamic Military Alliance
The enemies of Islam are dreaming to use the theological Sunni-Shia wedge in the Islamic world and turn the Muslim countries into raging flames. That is, Muslims killing Muslims - a cherished goal that the enemies cannot resist working on it. They have already covertly created terrorist groups like ISIS, TTP, etc. and are actively supporting these terrorist groups. On the other side, they have waged a war against Shia regimes ostensibly in support of Sunni Muslims and/or for the cause of democracy and human rights. Unfortunately the leaders of many Muslim countries don't really understand the hidden agenda of our enemy. It's not really hidden in reality. What you can expect from an alliance that is practically being led by Trump - a person who won the US presidential elections by using anti-Muslim rhetoric to its fullest. Even his recent journey says it all. He came to the summit, went to Israel, and then Europe. The role of Muslim countries has already been symbolized/defined during this summit. They are supposed to be paid foot-soldiers while the policies and goals will be defined and decisions will be taken at a higher echelon. If Pakistanis want to work like monkeys, they can join the alliance. But we do that, in addition to getting humiliation and receiving body bags, it will also entail some grave consequences in terms of geopolitics. We don't really need jumping into this enemy trap just for the sake of it. We cannot really stop it but at least we can avoid joining this evil game.
 
Pakistan has nothing to gain from containing Iran to please the Zionsts in Tel Aviv. We want to help Arabs fight ISIS not Iran.

Israel might not like Iran. The Gulf royals dislike them even more
Arabs and Turkey created the ISIS
 
Israel might not like Iran. The Gulf royals dislike them even more
Arabs and Turkey created the ISIS


So CIA is arabs and turkisk intelligence?
Grow up dude!!! EEven the americans know that ISIS is created by their own puppets

Now plss dont say Kulbushan Yadev is from ISI:partay::partay::partay::omghaha:
 
So CIA is arabs and turkisk intelligence?
Grow up dude!!! EEven the americans know that ISIS is created by their own puppets

Now plss dont say Kulbushan Yadev is from ISI:partay::partay::partay::omghaha:

If that is true Turkey can prevent the CIA from supplying the ISIS. Why doesn't Erdogan stop it ?
 
Zionists goals are aligning with the Saudi goals in Middle East. Of all the Arab countries crying foul against Iran, not a single country or all put together can challenge Israel. they are cowards and self centred.

Iran backs Hezbullah and this is the only militia that can stand up to Israel. If its principal backer Iran is targeted, the militia will cease to exist. I m not in this Shia Sunni conflict. Neither I m for or against Iran. What I m trying to say is that this confrontation is creating a division which will be played by enemies of all the countries, including Saudi Arabia and Iran.
 
Saudia is not interested in islamic Allience but only to save Saudi kingdom and become like dog where u can't act against Israel
 
Zionists goals are aligning with the Saudi goals in Middle East. Of all the Arab countries crying foul against Iran, not a single country or all put together can challenge Israel. they are cowards and self centred.

Iran backs Hezbullah and this is the only militia that can stand up to Israel. If its principal backer Iran is targeted, the militia will cease to exist. I m not in this Shia Sunni conflict. Neither I m for or against Iran. What I m trying to say is that this confrontation is creating a division which will be played by enemies of all the countries, including Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Hezbollah might have fought Israel to a standstill
They have been exposed as a fighting force in the Syrian civil war
 
Three Countries, One Image, One Message
triple-i-large-v04-d.jpg
 
Israel might not like Iran. The Gulf royals dislike them even more
Arabs and Turkey created the ISIS

Arabs on CIA and Mossad's payroll created Daesh. Turkish state is in no way involved in it, perhaps individuals with links to the FETO tried to implicate Turkey but they are on the run now. The west along with india still covertly supports Daesh but they blame Turkey in order to hide their mischief.


If that is true Turkey can prevent the CIA from supplying the ISIS. Why doesn't Erdogan stop it ?

As if Turkey is the only route for CIA, Mossad and RAW to resupply Daesh. The Turkish route is now closed after the FETO got exposed in Turkey.
 
Arabs on CIA and Mossad's payroll created Daesh. Turkish state is in no way involved in it, perhaps individuals with links to the FETO tried to implicate Turkey but they are on the run now. The west along with india still covertly supports Daesh but they blame Turkey in order to hide their mischief.



As if Turkey is the only route for CIA, Mossad and RAW to resupply Daesh. The Turkish route is now closed after the FETO got exposed in Turkey.
most of ISIS strongholds in Iraq and Syria are adjacent to Turkey
 

Back
Top Bottom