What's new

Why Do Americans Hate Beheadings But Love Drone Killings?

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Why Do Americans Hate Beheadings But Love Drone Killings?

By Coleen Rowley

October 01, 2014 "ICH" - "HP" - The answer lies in human psychology. And probably like the old observation about history, people who refuse to understand human psychology are doomed to be victims of psychological manipulation. How is it that even members of peace groups have now come to support US bombing? One lady framed the issue like this: "I request that we discuss and examine why the videotaped beheading of a human being is understood to be more egregious than the explosion (almost totally invisible to the public) of a human being by a missile or bomb fired from a drone."

There are at least four main reasons that explain why Americans care far more about the beheadings (thus far) of two Americans and one U.K citizen, than they care -- here's the polling -- about the thousands of foreign victims of US drone bombing. Here's how people are likely being manipulated into believing that more US bombing is the answer to such terroristic killings even when almost all military experts have admitted that it won't work and "there's no military solution":

1) "Us versus them" mentality, the group bonding also known as tribalism, nationalism, group elitism, etc. seems partially learned behavior but also hard-wired into humans (like other animals) to enable group survival. The worst, most excessive forms of group bonding are also known as racism. Yet it's an innate part of human psychological makeup to identify most closely with those whom we are close to and with whom we share group affinity, so Americans are always going to care more about Americans/Westerners as opposed to more distant foreigners;

2) The gruesome beheadings were deliberately and dramatically videotaped to ensure that US media brought the scenes into all US living rooms whereas the drone bombings of citizens of foreign countries are almost never filmed nor covered at all by US media. Thus to the majority of Americans, drone killings seem sterile, sanitized and surgical even though drone pilots who see the results up close know differently and some are even committing suicide.

3) It's apparent that even a large segment of the "peace" community does not understand that US wars and US-orchestrated regime changes indirectly created Islamic State (and other Al Qaeda type terrorist groups) and that US drone (and other aerial) bombing is giving rise to MORE terrorism, rather than working to reduce it. These two articles "How the West Created the Islamic State" and "How ISIS Is Using Us to Get What It Wants" describe the dynamic. As in all wars, the leaders of both sides are opportunistically using each other to empower each other. Robert Greenwald's video (below) puts it most succinctly: "How Perpetual War Fuels Terrorism." (But the opposite is also true: terrorism fuels war). This is well-known by Western intelligence analysts and foreign policy experts, and it's garden variety war manipulation for everyone except the duped US public. (Borowitz isn't really joking when he reports: "Americans Who Have Not Read a Single Article About Syria Strongly Support Bombing It.") It's depressing otherwise to learn how many uninformed people there are that still think "bombing the village to save it" somehow can work. Such "war on terror" propaganda is actually effective on the liberal-minded who are more vulnerable to having their emotional buttons -- fear, hate, greed, false pride and blind loyalty -- pressed than it is on more pragmatic, cool-headed realists. It's being reported that a number of US journalists who should know better have even fallen for hyped terror threats used to justify the launching of bombing upon Syria.

4) A fourth reason why most Americans now go happily along with perpetual war in a kind of blissful stupor, cheering on their favorite war hawk politician comes from the lessons learned so well from the Vietnam War. Getting rid of the military draft and putting the trillions of dollars of mounting war costs on the ever-expanding and perfectly elastic national debt card was a stroke of genius on the part of the military industrial complex to wipe away any remaining "Vietnam Syndrome." The new "poverty draft" that we're left with constitutes another layer of "us versus them" type manipulation geared to getting the liberal, intellectual middle class on board as they perceive little or no costs and only benefits to perpetual war. Even when not directly profiting by working for military or national security contractors, many Americans have come to believe war creates jobs and ensures they are supplied with cheap gas and other resources.

Anyway, I may be flat wrong but there has to be some explanation and I would welcome others' opinions. Without the witty humor of a Borowitz or Jon Stewart, people may also resent being told how they are constantly duped into this perpetual war that makes them less and less safe. But hopefully, more people will wise up to this psychological manipulation.


Why Do Americans Hate Beheadings But Love Drone Killings?:Â
Information Clearing House - ICH
 
Why do extremist Muslims hate drone killings and love public beheadings ?


Not sure if I understand what you are saying, who loves beheadings? I don't know anyone who does (except the terrorists themselves obviously). Anyway, extremist Muslims don't hate drone kilings; they are allied with Washington and Saudi Arabia. Washington needs constant terrorism to sustain the empire. Where did ISIL come from do you think, whose weapons do they use, whose funds and training did they receive? After ISIL, they will create new ones, that is how evil empires operate and sustain their hegemony for as long as they can.

Anyway, even if some extremist Muslims love beheadings, this still doesn't explain why MOST Americans support American state terrorism, does it? Or are most Americans extremists? Think about that.
 
Last edited:
Americans like me love justice.

Justice can only be served when founded upon true facts. If founded on a lie then just decisions cannot be made.

By contrast, militants like Hazzy997 and HB believe that "truth" isn't founded upon "fact" but what prevails. So a lone voice contradicting thousands of others is automatically "wrong" and the mob which robs and kills victims in the dark but claims afterwards they were the ones assaulted is automatically exonerated.

The upshot is that the justice of a killing depends on context, not the deed itself. Drones killing terrorists are both legally and morally justifiable; terrorists beheading unarmed non-combatants is not. It is this distinction that Rowley refuses to accept - and why she cannot claim the moral high ground.
 
You can not justify beheading with drone killings..
Beheading is the worst act by terrorists
and drone attacks kill terrorists who support this beheading act..
 
i personally have no problem if americans start beheading jihadi's , but then i think its time consuming .
A drone is much easier , faster and kills plenty in just one shot .
 
drone attacks kill terrorists who support this beheading act..
Amnesty International and human rights watch have released reports focused on Pakistan and yementhat say the strikes could be illegal and that the U.S. has killed more than 4,700 people, including more than 1,000 civilians.
 
[
Anyway, even if some extremist Muslims love beheadings, this still doesn't explain why MOST Americans support American state terrorism, does it? Or are most Americans extremists? Think about that.


That's because most Americans have been constantly fed Zionist media propaganda for the past 70+ years.
 
That's because most Americans have been constantly fed Zionist media propaganda for the past 70+ years.
I maintain that Pakistan and other Muslim-majority states are suffering from corruption and terror not because of anything Zionists do or have done but because they have failed to endorse Zionists and acknowledge the justice of their cause and deeds. The mental twisting involved in denial undermines the very notion of civil and property rights, freedom of expression, and in general ALL democratic values. Rejecting Zionism is why you fail - yet Zionists themselves have nothing at all to do with that failure; it's all your choice.
 
Holywood movies :world is at risk from criminals or aliens and there comes america with allies
Chinese movies: one man destroying whole army of criminals no friend required
.
.
.
Indian movie : a hero destroying all obstacles to get a................girl .ha ha ..
.
.
.
Pakistan movie :allahu akbar ..its religiously banned ..
 
You can not justify beheading with drone killings..
Beheading is the worst act by terrorists
and drone attacks kill terrorists who support this beheading act..

Drone attacks have killed many civilians, many innocent civilians who were killed due to poor intelligence, you can't condemn one and condone the other, drones decapitate in essence decapitating a civilian with a knife and decapitating a civilian with a drone is all the same, but the question is why one irks people and the other doesn't?

We can only defeat terrorism if we actually show we are better than terrorists, instead of defending ALL our actions we've got to criticize them once in a while especially when they are clearly unjustifiable, a kid/civilian getting killed by mistake by weapons of "civilized" nations should bring as much anger as when a innocent journalist or aid worker who signed up to work in a war zone gets killed, unlawfully.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom