What's new

WE'RE NOW PAYING FOR INDIA'S NAVY

Paan Singh

BANNED
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
7,636
Reaction score
0
THERE was fresh anger over taxpayer aid to India last night as it emerged the country is spending £1billion on three warships.

Britain is still handing over £280million a year despite India admitting it doesn’t need the help and regards the amount as “peanuts”.

As the Royal Navy suffers severe budget cuts, India has splashed out on Russian-built frigates, including one said to carry the world’s fastest Cruise missile. The news follows this month’s announcement that India is planning a £50million unmanned spacecraft mission to Mars.

Conservative MP Philip Davies said: “It seems to me that a country that spends billions on defence is more than capable of looking after its own people without £280million a year from British taxpayers. They could just spend £280million less on defence.

“Also, the money we give to India we have to borrow, so by the time we have repaid it, it’s a lot more.”

Overseas aid spending has escaped Coalition austerity cuts.

Ministers are committed to increasing it to 0.7 per cent of national output, up from £7.8billion this year to £11.5billion by 2015, to reach targets set by the United Nations.

India’s new Cruise missile-carrying frigate, INS Teg, is the first of three Talwar class warships ordered from the Yantar
shipyard in Russia.

The International Development Department insists: “As we have made clear many times, British aid is not used to fund India’s defence programme.”

But Joseph Hosier, a retired merchant seaman who revealed the purchase of the warships, said: “We haven’t got a merchant navy to speak of and, with what’s happened to the Royal Navy too, it’s disgusting.

“I’d like to know, if we’re so friendly with India, whether we were offered the contract for these ships, and if not, why not?”

Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Just a couple of weeks after learning how they are effect*ively subsidising India’s mission to Mars, British taxpayers will be dismayed to discover that the Indian government is splashing the cash on these new warships.

“India can afford to spend billions on ventures and equipment that the British Government goes without. This only goes to emphasise the absurdity of British aid going to India.”

Yorkshire MEP Godfrey Bloom, UK Independence Party defence spokesman, said: “India now has a far superior navy to ours – new frigates, aircraft carriers with aircraft. And what do we have?”

Despite India’s booming economy, millions of its citizens still live in poverty.

And yet India is said to be the world’s largest importer of arms.

Last year it also came seventh in a world league table of military spending after the US, China, Russia, the UK, France and Japan.

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute put India joint fourth with Britain in terms of spending as a percentage of GDP, at 2.6 per cent. India spent £30.9billion against the UK’s £39.6billion.

India’s military expansion has been driven by rivalries with neighbours Pakistan and China.

In January it chose French company Dassault for a £13billion order for 126 fighter aircraft instead of buying Eurofighter Typhoons offered by a consortium in which BAE Systems has a 33 per cent stake.

Britain has been without an aircraft carrier strike force since Sea Harriers were axed in 2010.

We're now paying for India's Navy as it spends our £280m aid on warships | UK News | Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express

India's warship deal is a slap in the face to Britain | Express Comment | Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express
 
Last edited by a moderator:
why is UK giving india money? loan?

loan or loot repayments?

Guilt for looting,raping and plundering India.


FFS will someone say what we're all thinking (the brown ones atleast) £280 million/year is NOTHING in comparsion to what they stole.They could pay this amount for the next 100 years and it still wouldn't make a dent in what they stole from India. Why won't some Indian politican make this statement??
 
Guilt for looting,raping and plundering India.


FFS will someone say what we're all thinking (the brown ones atleast) £280 million/year is NOTHING in comparsion to what they stole.They could pay this amount for the next 100 years and it still wouldn't make a dent in what they stole from India. Why won't some Indian politican make this statement??

isit actually for that? i thought they wouldnt have the face to do it atleast they are , good step , what is the name of this payment officialy? and also are they giving it to african countries aswell?
 
I am sometimes really forced to think that are these people so dumb so as to think that a country which has got people living in poverty would leave its territory at the mercy of it's enemy and would have no right whatsoever to invest in its defence and that too its own money and not some petty trifle amount routed through NGO's in which the Govt. has got no interest or direct benefit!!!?:sad:
 
hey Britain dude, if u want some cash I think GoI could lend u some, just like old times. Donn worry mate u can have some money for your, as u said, "sorry *** navy" :angel:
 
Actually, it's completely Britain's fault. We have clearly stated, "we no longer need your bloody aid" to them, many times before. I remember the Government of UK retaliating, "It's our duty to provide to the poorest nation on Earth".

What to do with such people? :rofl:
 
isit actually for that? i thought they wouldnt have the face to do it atleast they are , good step , what is the name of this payment officialy? and also are they giving it to african countries aswell?

No its not offically for this. The guise is for poverty relief but the fact the figure (£248million/year) os so pitifully low and that the UKG has cut similar aid to nations who do FAR less and spend FAR less on poverty alieviation but has "ring-fenced" aid to India makes it clear what the real intent is.The UKG is literally trying to buy favour with the GoI and hoping this money will help secure deals and trade because Indian-UK trade is pathetically low. But this has blown back in the UKG's face as proven by the MMRCA decision and now there is outcry in the UK. If the MMRCA had gone EFT's way you can be sure not an eyelid would be raised about any of these purchases.

The fact is the UKG actually and literally begged India to accept the aid.


UK paying for the IN? Give me a break, annual UK aid could pay for 1/4 of a P-15B.
 

Back
Top Bottom