What's new

U.S. Starts Shipping Out, via Risky Pakistan Route

jeypore

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
2,885
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
United States
KABUL—The U.S. military's efforts to ship out the mountains of equipment it accumulated over 11 years of Afghan war began in earnest this month, when a trial load of military hardware trucked through Pakistan set sail from the port of Karachi.

The shipment, which included more than 70 containers and 20 military vehicles, was a crucial test of a plan to bring home an estimated $22 billion in U.S. military gear from landlocked Afghanistan. Until now, the Pakistani route was used for supplies entering Afghanistan, rather than exiting.

U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Steven Shapiro, deputy commanding general of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command, said the successful delivery proved that the coalition's transit route through Pakistan would enable the military to meet President Barack Obama's goal of cutting the size of the 66,000-strong American force in Afghanistan by half by next February.

"Pakistan certainly has a vested interest in getting it right too, because it's a big deal for them," Gen. Shapiro said. "So we feel very confident that the Pakistani military is going to help us move through Pakistan."

The route through Karachi may, however, prove problematic. In recent months, several large neighborhoods in the city have fallen under the sway of the Taliban. Further underscoring the risks, a suicide bomber on Friday attacked a Pakistani security convoy in the northern city of Peshawar, which lies along one of two the main transportation corridors.

The bomb exploded around half a mile from the U.S. consulate in the city. Jameel Shah, a spokesman for Peshawar's Lady Reading Hospital, said 12 people were killed.

Gen. Shapiro said Friday he wasn't alarmed by recent security incidents along the Pakistan route, and said the U.S. had alternatives to shipping through the country. "We're not going to put all of our eggs in one basket," he said.

The U.S. began taking out equipment last year as part of the withdrawal of 33,000 surge troops. The military says it now plans to move a combined total of around 100 containers and vehicles per week through Pakistan, a figure that is going to increase gradually over the coming weeks.

When the exodus is in full swing—military commanders expect the logistics push to reach its peak this August—the U.S. will be sending about 1,500 military vehicles and 1,000 containers per month out of Afghanistan. The majority—around two-thirds of that cargo—will move through Pakistan, military officials say.

The most sensitive equipment, such as weapons and communications systems, must be flown out by air, the costliest option. U.S. officials have also negotiated an alternative overland route, dubbed the Northern Distribution Network, through Central Asia to Baltic and Black Sea ports. While more expensive than the route through Pakistan, the NDN isn't exposed to attacks by Pakistani Taliban.

In the past, militants in Pakistan's tribal areas have sporadically attacked U.S. and coalition convoys bringing vital supplies into Afghanistan. And in 2011, Pakistan closed the border for months, following a coalition airstrike that claimed the lives of 24 Pakistani troops.

The pullout of American gear may also face complications as bilateral relations between Kabul and Islamabad erode. In recent weeks, top Afghan officials have said Pakistan isn't doing enough to support nascent efforts to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table, and accused Islamabad of demanding unacceptable preconditions for its assistance in peace talks.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai is currently planning a trip to the Gulf emirate of Qatar, where the Taliban last year began to establish a political office to facilitate peace talks. Aimal Faizi, Mr. Karzai's spokesman, said the Afghan president would leave "very soon" for his official trip to Qatar, where he would also meet with Qatari businessmen interested in investing in Afghanistan. Thus far, the Taliban have refused to negotiate directly with Mr. Karzai's government.

U.S. officials estimate the U.S. will spend $6 billion over around three years to remove what needs to go home by a December 2014 withdrawal deadline. The remaining equipment will be handed over to the Afghans, or simply scrapped.

Complicating the U.S. departure from Afghanistan is the lack of a friendly neighbor that can provide a holding area for military gear while it is packed, prepped and readied for shipment onward.

During the withdrawal from Iraq, U.S. commanders described neighboring Kuwait as a "catcher's mitt" for military equipment: Bases in the deserts of northern Kuwait served as giant parking lots for armored vehicles, trucks and Humvees awaiting shipment home.

Departing units could simply drive down Route Tampa, the main military supply road, and hand over the keys to their vehicles. Once that was done, equipment could be sent home from Kuwaiti ports back home to U.S. depots for maintenance, repair or storage.

Write to Nathan Hodge at nathan.hodge@wsj.com

U.S. Starts Shipping Out, via Risky Pakistan Route - WSJ.com
 
The US Pakistan relationship will remain stable till they are out of Afghanistan. The tone will change once they are out, its not something I am wishing but predicting based on History.
 
WO-AN218_AFEXIT_NS_20130329181514.jpg
 
The US Pakistan relationship will remain stable till they are out of Afghanistan. The tone will change once they are out, its not something I am wishing but predicting based on History.

Correct. Pakistan was lose the one leverage that they have on the US.

Past is sometimes the best guide to the future. It has happened earlier.
 
The US Pakistan relationship will remain stable till they are out of Afghanistan. The tone will change once they are out, its not something I am wishing but predicting based on History.

Predicting What?????????????

Mr. Acid Rain,,, What huge mess?

Explain.......
 
They are planning bases, if they don't have us on board..........use your imagination. :coffee:

Yet, many of you are so eagerly waiting for their departure.

And a return to the familiar and the tried and tested.

Are those bases going to be there to control the events in the region or to create dependence on you?
 
Yet, many of you are so eagerly waiting for their departure.

And a return to the familiar and the tried and tested.

Are those bases going to be there to control the events in the region or to create dependence on you?

Inversely proportional/self feeding/Catch-22/Twin blade sword. What ever you call it!

It is clear as day that Americans are here to **** us [Asia], this continent,our economies,our prosperity,the future of our childern and even our puppy dog is ours to lose.
 
Inversely proportional/self feeding/Catch-22/Twin blade sword. What ever you call it!

It is clear as day that Americans are here to **** us [Asia], this continent,our economies,our prosperity,the future of our childern and even our puppy dog is ours to lose.

It is ours to lose if we allow them to. If we let our own "enmity" to overshadow our interests.

We can use USA (or other entities) to get ourselves out of the morass, develop ourselves faster, improve the lot of our poor and disadvantaged people, use their technical and management expertize to leapfrog and catch up with the best out there.

The choice is ours to make.
 
@jeypore, A victory dance by the taliban, they'll go berserk in the vacated areas, a civil war.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They are planning bases, if they don't have us on board..........use your imagination. :coffee:

A smaller footprint means they can manage via air/other routes if needed. Not saying they will begin to fight but your leverage will go down significantly.
 
@jeypore, A victory dance by the taliban, they'll go berserk in the vacated areas, a civil war.

That is the likely outcome now, once the USA "leaves".

There will be a formal or informal (Iraq style) division of Afghanistan along ethnic lines. The Pushtun will suffer (or enjoy) the Taliban (and probably the occasional drone) and the Tajiks and Uzbeks their ANA.

None of them can overrun the other in these conditions unless something changes drastically.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@jeypore, A victory dance by the taliban, they'll go berserk in the vacated areas, a civil war.

I doubt that.... Pakistan is not still in control yet....

It itself cannot fix it north east region, how the hell is going to fix or even control Afghanistan...........

First, it has to fight an control it's on regional control before even thinking about strategy value of another country......

Inversely proportional/self feeding/Catch-22/Twin blade sword. What ever you call it!

Interesting choice of words, when your own creation is knocking at your door steps and you have not figured out to defeat them yet........ Why even talk about US...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom