Strikes on Pakistan can create nuclear holocaust: Feroz Khan

[INDIC]

It's a Policy You mighty mighty Troll.

Since day one Pakistan is maintaining and repeatedly saying to keep the "Minimum Deterance". Ever heard of that?

That doesn't mean we didn't work on more than 25000+ and were too busy in making "waar" movie. Google Pakistan's ICBM program for info and kindly don't bother the audience with your obnoxious trolling skills.

You kid, go watch pogo and come back with credible sense and info to debate on. Replying you is indeed a waste of time.

So, are you claiming Pakistan possesses ICBM without testing it after leaving a huge gap inbetween.

 

[chhota bheem]

since there seems to be no conclusion as to the out come ,as per the title first why would India strike in the first place....imagining even if we strike the camps in pakistan ,will Pakistan risk a nuclear war for few camps destroyed or will it try to use it to put pressure on India with the help of International community.

 

[Mav3rick]

You have to admire the arguments here......any India BMD will fail....be of no use..etc but any Pakistani BMD "will be
quite influential in the outcome of any war"...........

Consider the scenario when you are intimately aware of the enemy's defence capability as opposed to believing that the enemy has none.

 

[Mav3rick]

Seems you guys own lot many things without even testing anything. I heard you too claim having an ICBM without any testing.

We do not need to test things that we have not developed. These are purchased only after through evaluations.

 

[kinsr]

Ha ha ha.. funny thread..
Does Pakistan have a credible enough delivery system to deliver those so called "200" warhead into Indian airspace. Last time they had a successful test of the ghauri, the villagers of Dadu had to take cover. That is their credibility of their "successful test" claims, and lolz pakistani are talking so big here like MARV MIRV BMD ICBM and what not. Its all hot air. They dont have anything credible beyond 1000km to send to India. And even that 1000km is suspect. Other than that, they talk of overwhelming attack by a barrage of missiles, do pakistanis have any idea how many will it take to overwhelm our systems with multi-layered defence? Its in thousands. Does pakistan has the capability to produce that kind of numbers when they have zero manufacturing base. Other than that, the days of surprise attack by air are over so pakistan cant nuke India anyway,, lolz pakistanis and their dreams of nuking India

 

[INDIC]

We do not need to test things that we have not developed. These are purchased only after through evaluations.

But Pakistan's claimed to have developed indigenous weapons.

 

[Mad King]

since there seems to be no conclusion as to the out come ,as per the title first why would India strike in the first place....imagining even if we strike the camps in pakistan ,will Pakistan risk a nuclear war for few camps destroyed or will it try to use it to put pressure on India with the help of International community.

Strike camps? Someone need balls of steel to do that and not only that the consequences would be far worse than india can ever imagine of. Pakistan Armed forces being india centric won't compromise this offence as our corrupt politicians compromised the american offence in Abbottabad n didn't let military leadership to intervene (as Pak Army has been to conscious not to touch politics since Musharraf's misadventures). Why would Pakistani politicians would have allowed them? They have been grabbing a lot of dollars from allowing supply routes to the compromise of Pak Air Space for drones.

Coming back on strike camps - So called dream of "surgical strikes" is an utter rubbish as someone need to think wisely as what they are talking of. Everyone knows all those 9 indian consulates in Afghanistan are doing and from TTP to BLA/BRA who is running the financial and ammo support. india really need to re-vise its foreign policy against her neighbors coz its completely screwed up and should educate its citizens to come out of bollywood sunny deol's kinda fallacy to keep up her economy to flourish in order to compete China.

 

[chhota bheem]

Strike camps? Someone need balls of steel to do that and not only that the consequences would be far worse than india can ever imagine of. Pakistan Armed forces being india centric won't compromise this offence as our corrupt politicians compromised the american offence in Abbottabad n didn't let military leadership to intervene (as Pak Army has been to conscious not to touch politics since Musharraf's misadventures). Why would Pakistani politicians would have allowed them? They have been grabbing a lot of dollars from allowing supply routes to the compromise of Pak Air Space for drones.

Coming back on strike camps - So called dream of "surgical strikes" is an utter rubbish as someone need to think wisely as what they are talking of. Everyone knows all those 9 indian consulates in Afghanistan are doing and from TTP to BLA/BRA who is running the financial and ammo support. india really need to re-vise its foreign policy against her neighbors coz its completely screwed up and should educate its citizens to come out of bollywood sunny deol's kinda fallacy to keep up her economy to flourish in order to compete China.

First lets keep it simple if you keep discussing all the factors then we wont reach any where that is any where near to India striking and then Pakistans Nuclear attack.againg what i asked was if India strikes will Pakistan use nukes or will it use the incident to build a case against India and put pressure on India with the international community, wont you think its much more wiser to bring the dispute into limelight and international community to interfear rather than using nukes and commiting sucide.

 

[kinsr]

Strike camps? Someone need balls of steel to do that and not only that the consequences would be far worse than india can ever imagine of. Pakistan Armed forces being india centric won't compromise this offence as our corrupt politicians compromised the american offence in Abbottabad n didn't let military leadership to intervene (as Pak Army has been to conscious not to touch politics since Musharraf's misadventures). Why would Pakistani politicians would have allowed them? They have been grabbing a lot of dollars from allowing supply routes to the compromise of Pak Air Space for drones.

Coming back on strike camps - So called dream of "surgical strikes" is an utter rubbish as someone need to think wisely as what they are talking of. Everyone knows all those 9 indian consulates in Afghanistan are doing and from TTP to BLA/BRA who is running the financial and ammo support. india really need to re-vise its foreign policy against her neighbors coz its completely screwed up and should educate its citizens to come out of bollywood sunny deol's kinda fallacy to keep up her economy to flourish in order to compete China.

Ha ha ha ,, why would we need to change the foreign policy when its working perfectly for us. The objective of that foreign policy is to strengthen India and ruin our enemies. See the end results, the same foreign policy has made friends from japan to peru and ruining our enemies like pakistan

 

[Mad King]

Ha ha ha ,, why would we need to change the foreign policy when its working perfectly for us. The objective of that foreign policy is to strengthen India and ruin our enemies. See the end results, the same foreign policy has made friends from japan to peru and ruining our enemies like pakistan

Ruining? Don't you think this word is too heavy considering present statistics?

Would have been better if india could remain out of radar with such "foreign policies".

Japan to Peru? Another intellectually handicapped bollywood believer. I mentioned foreign policy for neighbors. Didn't know india switched its neighbors with Japan and Peru.

"The objective of that foreign policy is to strengthen India and ruin our enemies"

Ha Ha - I believe india is Pakistan's agent - Whenever there is saber rattling between india and PAKISTAN and offensive political statements are given from india, Pakistani Nation get UNITED more than ever before. Thanks India. Your policy is indeed working.

 

[Mad King]

First lets keep it simple if you keep discussing all the factors then we wont reach any where that is any where near to India striking and then Pakistans Nuclear attack.againg what i asked was if India strikes will Pakistan use nukes or will it use the incident to build a case against India and put pressure on India with the international community, wont you think its much more wiser to bring the dispute into limelight and international community to interfear rather than using nukes and commiting sucide.

Chottay, You weirdest wildest wet dream of india 'striking' Pakistan is completely out of proportion. Both Nuclear Countries are constantly keeping an eye via satellite n other means on each other and a slight move in nuclear warheads would led International community intervene.

Apart from India there are so other regional powers who have vast strategic edges linked with Pakistan and they won't let it damage as we all are linked geographically. So, Nuclear war would be lose-lose situation and there would be no come back unlike in a conventional war in which later it can be decided who bears the heavy loss and who won.

Now Answer to your last sentence - Yes I agree. And this is what Pakistan has done so far. "bringing disputes in Limelight" which is "Kashmir".

but seems like your own government is in no position to agree with you.

 

[kinsr]

Ruining? Don't you think this word is too heavy considering present statistics?

Would have been better if india could remain out of radar with such "foreign policies".

Japan to Peru? Another intellectually handicapped bollywood believer. I mentioned foreign policy for neighbors. Didn't know india switched its neighbors with Japan and Peru.

"The objective of that foreign policy is to strengthen India and ruin our enemies"

Ha Ha - I believe india is Pakistan's agent - Whenever there is saber rattling between india and PAKISTAN and offensive political statements are given from india, Pakistani Nation get UNITED more than ever before. Thanks India. Your policy is indeed working.

do you really believe your countrymen are united? Yes this is the foreign policy for you,, a very caliberated response militarily just enough to keep PA off from western borders and not to excite pakistanis into a huddle against India, dont worry we wont let you unite against us and wont let you fight freely on the western borders against TTP. You should keep these foreign policy sermons for your chinese friends they are doing badly in their neighborhood. India on the other hand has good friends in all its neighbor except pakistan be it bangladesh, bhutan, nepal, myanmar and even china and sri lanka., ,,,,, wake up and smell the coffee my friend.,, you got everything wrong

 

[Mad King]

do you really believe your countrymen are united? Yes this is the foreign policy for you,, a very caliberated response militarily just enough to keep PA off from western borders and not to excite pakistanis into a huddle against India, dont worry we wont let you unite against us and wont let you fight freely on the western borders against TTP. You should keep these foreign policy sermons for your chinese friends they are doing badly in their neighborhood. India on the other hand has good friends in all its neighbor except pakistan be it bangladesh, bhutan, nepal, myanmar and even china and sri lanka., ,,,,, wake up and smell the coffee my friend.,, you got everything wrong

Source : Wikipedia

Disputes with recognized sovereign states

People's Republic of China:
Disputed areas located between Aksai Chin and Nepal[edit]
Demchok, Chumar, Kaurik, Shipki Pass, Jadh, and Lapthal. All occupied by India except for most of the Demchok parcel.

Trans-Karakoram Tract
Arunachal Pradesh
Depsang Plains


Bangladesh[edit]

• Daikhata-Dumabari
• Lathitila
• Muhurichar river island
• Pyrdiwah

Boraibari[edit]
Boraibari falls under the adverse possession category with the map suggesting that it should be within India but it has been controlled by Bangladesh authorities since 1971.

Nepal[edit]

• Antudanda
• Nawalparasi

Kalapani[edit]
Kalapani (कालापानी) is an area under territorial dispute in Darchula District, Nepal and Pithoragarh district of India.

Although claimed by Nepal, Kalapaani has been occupied by India's Indo-Tibetan border security forces since the 1962 border war with China. Nepal claims that the river cited in the 1816 treaty should be followed all the way to its Himalayan source as the boundary, rather than the ridge line east of the river claimed by India. The river borders the Nepalese zone of Mahakali and the Indian state of Uttarakhand. The Sugauli Treaty signed by Nepal and British India in 1816 utilizes the Kali River as Nepal's western boundary with India. Subsequent maps drawn by British surveyors show the source of the boundary river at different places. This discrepancy in locating the source of the river led to boundary disputes between India and Nepal, with each country producing maps supporting their own claims. The Kalapani River runs through an area that includes a disputed area of about 400 km² around the source of the river although the exact size of the disputed area varies from source to source.

Susta[edit]
Susta is an area under territorial dispute currently in Tribenisusta, Nepal and near Nichaul, Uttar Pradesh, India. The area under dispute totals over 14,000 hectars.

Myanmar[edit]
Narcondam Island[edit]
Until 1986 Burma claimed sovereignty over Narcondam Island, the easternmost point of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. This claim was given upon reaching agreement with India on the delimitation of the maritime boundary between the two nations in the Andaman Sea, the Coco Channel and the Bay of Bengal.

Sri Lanka[edit]
Kachchatheevu[edit]
Kachchatheevu or Katchatheevu or Kachativu (Tamil: கச்சத்தீவு Kaccatīvu) (Sinhala:කච්චතීවු) is an uninhabited island belonging to [Sri Lanka - Disputed] Comprising a Area of 285 Acres. This island was given to Sri Lanka by India in 1974. It has a Catholic shrine and has been declared as a sacred area by the government of Sri Lanka. In 2001, the Tamil Government called for the return of the island but Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa, former Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Minister of Sri Lanka and current president, declined. He said that, `It is impossible to give it back to them as it has been recognized by the international community as an integral part of our country since it was handed over by late Indira Gandhi.'

 

[Bang Galore]

Consider the scenario when you are intimately aware of the enemy's defence capability as opposed to believing that the enemy has none.

You consider that. What you know might be what someone wants you to know. Not so simple, eh?

 

[Mad King]

do you really believe your countrymen are united? Yes this is the foreign policy for you,, a very caliberated response militarily just enough to keep PA off from western borders and not to excite pakistanis into a huddle against India, dont worry we wont let you unite against us and wont let you fight freely on the western borders against TTP. You should keep these foreign policy sermons for your chinese friends they are doing badly in their neighborhood. India on the other hand has good friends in all its neighbor except pakistan be it bangladesh, bhutan, nepal, myanmar and even china and sri lanka., ,,,,, wake up and smell the coffee my friend.,, you got everything wrong

Who is been smelling the wrong coffee now? You should go and rest in piece my friend. You're lost.