Jango
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,530
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country
- Location
Oh, that is all to ensure "welfare of the troops and their families" as has already been stated above.
I will go along with the flow,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, that is all to ensure "welfare of the troops and their families" as has already been stated above.
Oh, that is all to ensure "welfare of the troops and their families" as has already been stated above.
thanks for your understanding, thats what the good author is trying to sell and commending Gen Kyani as well
Pakistan's 'elected civilian leaders' have been equally guilty of ignoring seniority, experience and qualifications when nominating their 'preferred' chiefs to the services.I say, the three senior most generals should get the command of the 3 newly created commands and next COAS should be among these 3 senior most generals, plus CJCSC should also have experience of this command. Commanding 3 or more corps by a Lt Gen would add more experience and a good contender for the job of COAS. And i do believe that would be the way too, but lets see.
Then how come they tolerate those lazy, bum good for nothing politicians.. and keep making deals with them??
A glaring example of a cantt being over whelmingly used for commercial activities is Walton Cantt. The place is practically all sold out for commercial purposes.
What is wrong with utilizing the Cantt's for 'commercial purposes'?
...................
Pakistan's 'elected civilian leaders' have been equally guilty of ignoring seniority, experience and qualifications when nominating their 'preferred' chiefs to the services.
Ayub, Zia and Musharraf were all 'preferred choices' by civilian leaders.
Army is not going to leave it's luxuries. I mean the Generals drive around in all sorts of expensive cars...on state's money. What do you expect of them? They join army to make money not defend the country.
never a good thing to generalize though.....i usually like to cite the story of the late Gen. Asif Nawaz; it was Nawaz Sharif who offered him (or rather already purchased) a flagship BMW sedan (boot-licking) which Gen. declined. He stuck to his modest state-provided Corolla car.
the COAS is issued one of the Mercedes sedans which were purchased back in late 2004 --the rest are allotted to civilian officials.
as for the thread itself --thanks for posting. I'll be happy to give more input tomorrow on it.
Other than the fact that commercial uses of appropriated land meant for military uses is a violation of the very purpose of their existence?
A case for Total Reorientation And Restructuring of the Pakistan*Army
By: Yasub Ali Dogar Brigadier(Rtd.)
I was born on 8th*Dec 1946. My father Maj (Late) Mahbub Ali was then a Capt of 6/12 FFR seconded to the Indian Army Education Corps. Thus you can say that I was born in the Army, grew up in the Army and got educated at the Military Collage Jhelum.
During this period of over 45 years I have seen a gradual degradation of the operational preparedness, efficiency, integrity and welfare of the subordinates particularly of the soldiers. It would have further degenerated had this trend not been arrested by Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani. The credit goes to him to once again prioritize the wellbeing and welfare of soldiers. However the recent events have clouded that good work.
The degradation of the militarys professionalism started off during the era of Gen Yahya Khan, was grossly accentuated during Gen Zia ul Haqs period of 11 years and reached its*climax in Gen Musharrafs decade long rule. Since then over a period of time the Pakistan Army has become unwieldy, over staffed by general officers and has been moving away from its core responsibility of defending the Nation. Now a days a corps or a division commander would be involved in some or all of the following activities at the time and cost of operational preparedness of his command.
- DHA at all major military garrisons.
- Logistics Areas i.e. which control the static installations which were under GHQ before 1977 were placed under command corps during Gen Zias period.
- Garrison schools in the cantonments and admission for Army Public Schools/Garrison Academys.
- Looking after the Station/Services/Garrison clubs
- Golf courses /polo grounds which are mostly played by officers.*
- Managing shopping centres like the Fortress Stadium, petrol pumps and a host of other commercial activities.
***In short the corps/division commanders are doing most of the above tasks at the cost of their own primary responsibilities of keeping their commands operationally sound. This unfortunate trend to get involved in non-operational matters finally led to failures like the Abbottabad incident.
***An effort has been made to single out major problem areas and recommendations have been made to rectify them.
Problem Area and Recommendations
The corps, divisions or brigades should not have any station or administrative responsibilities. They should just concentrate on their operational roles. All other aspects may be looked after by other organizations/HQs within the Pak Army.
The Logistic Areas: They should fall under the GHQ with control over CMHs, supply depots, ordinance depots and all other static installations. Similarly all APS/Garrison schools be placed under the HQ Logistics Area and monitoring responsibility be that of GSO 1 (Education) at the HQ Logistics Area.
Corruption:* There have been reports of corruption at higher level without any accountability e.g. the NLC scandal. It is clear that a corrupt leadership cannot lead*troops in the field to give the supreme sacrifice of their lives.
Austerity and Simplicity: Simple and austere living should be the hall mark of Defence Services, they should be an example for the entire nation. Palatial messes, ornately decorated offices and excessive expenditures on entertainment from official funds are not keeping with Islamic or that matter military traditions. Similarly move Sanction to attend marriages and private functions should be ruthlessly cut down.
i have no information on what you mentioned therefore it would not be appropriate for me to comment on it....
but what i can say is -- you should be more concerned about outwardly NON-isolated cases......like the MNAs who find clever ways to hide their assets and undisclosed income(s). The ones who earn much larger salaries than most 'politicians' in the entire world.
i dont know why people find it more fashionable to bash these imaginary serving generals while publicly it is known which politicians are sitting on huge wealth, who still only pay the equivalent of $60 worth of tax per annum.