Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,002
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Bhai wo noon leagi hy
U turn ley liya hoga
Beghair sochay samjhay baat karna inki adat hy
Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion
- Thread starter war&peace
- Start date
- Status
U turn ley liya hoga
Beghair sochay samjhay baat karna inki adat hy
Taimoor Khan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2016
- Messages
- 13,811
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
But that is the contempt of court and gives impression that state doesn't have control over these nobodies of DAWN and jung group.
CJ must take suo moto and bring these ahole journalist and columnist to task.
AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Impose HOUSE ARREST on all Nawaistani , party members till court sorts out their criminal past
PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
Koi kisi ki wajah se kisi controversy main nahi phansa.. We respect Justice Khosa a lot, but do you think had IK not taken the issue of Panama, SC would have still taken sou motto? At least I don't think so!
Panama ka case tou PPP aur baqi parties ne taqreeban bigar dia tha.. It was IK who brought it to the end.. Itni struggle hai uss banday ki.. itni struggle hai ke aap aur main soch bhi nahi saktay..
I mean all others aik taraf aur aik akela IK doosri taraf.. Was this his responsibility to work so hard? Sh. Rasheed ya Jamaat e Islami main itni himmat aur taqat thi ke yeh karletay.. aur kia CJ main itni himmat thi ke baghair lock down ki call ke koi sou motto lete?
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,002
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Jab baat takht e Lahore ki ho to hath hola hota hy
AB buri tarah phas chuky hain in bongiyon sey kuch nahi hona
PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
Sir, I am telling you, even if there is a long silence, koi na koi story phir bhi aayegi..
Khair, agar baat twist kar di ho kisi ne tou I don't care.. woh tou khamoshi ko bhi twist de daingay..
Hum kab tak dartay rahainge yaar inn se..
El Sidd
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 67,583
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
Shining example of putting leader worship beyond loyalty to Pakistan.
All PMLN Goons are the same, they are parasites of Nawaz corruption.
fatman17
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 32,563
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
- Location
Opinion
Dr Farrukh Saleem
July 30, 2017
Capital suggestion: Working courts
Nisar was candid and transparent. He demonstrated vision and clarity. He appeared a man of character, integrity and principles.
Seventy-seven years ago, the Luftwaffe of the Third Reich (the German Air Force) began bombing London. Seventy-seven years ago, Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, prime minister of the United Kingdom, was being briefed on the “death and destruction and how almost all economic activity had collapsed”.
Churchill asked, “Are the courts functioning?” Churchill was told that the “judges were present in the courts and dispensing justice”. Churchill replied, “Thank God. If the courts are working, nothing can go wrong.”
Pakistan is up against serious challenges – both internal and external. Internally, there’s Operation Raddul Fasaad and Operation Khyber-4. Externally, there’s General Bipin Rawat in the east and the National Directorate of Security in the west.
Our Supreme Court had two choices: to repeat history or to write history. The Supreme Court wrote history. The good news is that Pakistan’s judiciary has now assumed its prescribed constitutional role-check and balance. The other good news is that the Supreme Court has ended an era – a thoroughly corrupt era. The Supreme Court has now provided a platform for change. Yes, Pakistan’s judiciary is working and as long as the “courts are working, nothing can go wrong.”
Under the constitution, the business of the state is to be run under a system of ‘checks and balances’ within a “mechanism designed to limit power of a single individual or body of government”. Checks and balances are “intended to allow legitimate power to govern and good ideas to be implemented, while abuse of power, corruption, and oppression are minimised”.
On Thursday, I heard a Pakistani politician speak. And I have never heard a Pakistani politician speak the way he did last Thursday. Chaudhry Nisar was candid. He was transparent. He demonstrated vision. His speech was vivid and concrete. He demonstrated clarity of mind. He appeared a man of character. He appeared a man of integrity. And he appeared a man of principles. His speech had content, delivery and the right language – three in one.
I admit that I had somehow lost confidence in our political elite. Yes, he has restored at least some of my lost confidence. He told us how sycophancy has gained a central role in our politics. His message was about our political bankruptcy. He told us how easy it had become for stooges and sycophants to secure top berths within the PML-N (or any other political party for that matter). He told us how sycophancy within the PML-N had become a measure of political accomplishment.
The best of all is that he appeared to be a politician who really understands Pakistan’s rather complex threat matrix (military, nuclear, terrorist, cyber and economic). He seems to be a man with a plan: his civil-military synthesis. The civil-military synthesis model is the one that the entire civilised world utilises to achieve success. Pakistan can do the same.
Yes, the man has faults; we all do – some more, others less. I think he erred by committing to quit politics. Yes, I think he is ambitious. Yes, I am convinced that he has a strong desire to climb up the political ladder. And, yes, he is known to keep company with elements with declared affinity to the use of terror for political ends.
Thank God. The courts are working. It’s the dawn of a new era. Only legitimate power should govern. Let good ideas be implemented. End abuse of power. End corruption.
The writer is a columnist based in Islamabad.
Email: farrukh15@hotmail.com. Twitter: @saleemfarrukh
Dr Farrukh Saleem
July 30, 2017
Capital suggestion: Working courts
Nisar was candid and transparent. He demonstrated vision and clarity. He appeared a man of character, integrity and principles.
Seventy-seven years ago, the Luftwaffe of the Third Reich (the German Air Force) began bombing London. Seventy-seven years ago, Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, prime minister of the United Kingdom, was being briefed on the “death and destruction and how almost all economic activity had collapsed”.
Churchill asked, “Are the courts functioning?” Churchill was told that the “judges were present in the courts and dispensing justice”. Churchill replied, “Thank God. If the courts are working, nothing can go wrong.”
Pakistan is up against serious challenges – both internal and external. Internally, there’s Operation Raddul Fasaad and Operation Khyber-4. Externally, there’s General Bipin Rawat in the east and the National Directorate of Security in the west.
Our Supreme Court had two choices: to repeat history or to write history. The Supreme Court wrote history. The good news is that Pakistan’s judiciary has now assumed its prescribed constitutional role-check and balance. The other good news is that the Supreme Court has ended an era – a thoroughly corrupt era. The Supreme Court has now provided a platform for change. Yes, Pakistan’s judiciary is working and as long as the “courts are working, nothing can go wrong.”
Under the constitution, the business of the state is to be run under a system of ‘checks and balances’ within a “mechanism designed to limit power of a single individual or body of government”. Checks and balances are “intended to allow legitimate power to govern and good ideas to be implemented, while abuse of power, corruption, and oppression are minimised”.
On Thursday, I heard a Pakistani politician speak. And I have never heard a Pakistani politician speak the way he did last Thursday. Chaudhry Nisar was candid. He was transparent. He demonstrated vision. His speech was vivid and concrete. He demonstrated clarity of mind. He appeared a man of character. He appeared a man of integrity. And he appeared a man of principles. His speech had content, delivery and the right language – three in one.
I admit that I had somehow lost confidence in our political elite. Yes, he has restored at least some of my lost confidence. He told us how sycophancy has gained a central role in our politics. His message was about our political bankruptcy. He told us how easy it had become for stooges and sycophants to secure top berths within the PML-N (or any other political party for that matter). He told us how sycophancy within the PML-N had become a measure of political accomplishment.
The best of all is that he appeared to be a politician who really understands Pakistan’s rather complex threat matrix (military, nuclear, terrorist, cyber and economic). He seems to be a man with a plan: his civil-military synthesis. The civil-military synthesis model is the one that the entire civilised world utilises to achieve success. Pakistan can do the same.
Yes, the man has faults; we all do – some more, others less. I think he erred by committing to quit politics. Yes, I think he is ambitious. Yes, I am convinced that he has a strong desire to climb up the political ladder. And, yes, he is known to keep company with elements with declared affinity to the use of terror for political ends.
Thank God. The courts are working. It’s the dawn of a new era. Only legitimate power should govern. Let good ideas be implemented. End abuse of power. End corruption.
The writer is a columnist based in Islamabad.
Email: farrukh15@hotmail.com. Twitter: @saleemfarrukh
Farah Sohail
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2012
- Messages
- 7,228
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
IK ki struggle main koi shak nahi... But ye IK ki baghair sochay samjhay bolnay ki aadat se...apnay well wishers ko bhi controversial banaa deta hai.. Dharna main kaha ke umpire ki ungli uthnay wali hai...
Doosri baat ye ke...Sheikh Rashid ne IK se bhi pehle petition di thee.. Phir..Justice Khosa was not the CJ.. Woh khud se suo moto le bhi nahi saktay thay.. Kia pata..woh agar CJ hotay tu khud bhi suo moto le letay?
But tht is not the issue.. Petitions ki hearing tu pehle bhi bht hoti rahi hain.. Judiciary phir bhi lenient decisions deti rahi hai.. Yhi IK ki petition thee..yehi media focus tha, panama case par..lekin Justice Jamali tu beech main hearing chor kar chuttiyon par chalay gaye thay..IK ne kia kar liya?. Woh tu jab Justice Khosa ne hearing shuru ki..tab se daily hearings shuru hueein.. And do u think..ke agar Justice Khosa itna hard hitting..verdict na detay...tu kia baqi 3 judges bhi ye verdict de paatay? Justice Khosa ka is case main bhtt ziada contribution hai..
Aur ab unhi Justice Khosa..ko ek unnecessary contorversy main involve kar liya..baghair sochay samjhay bolnay ki aadat ki wajah se... Ke unke family member ko clarification bhi deni pari... Aap ko bura nahi lag raha unki family ke liye?
Last edited:
Burhan Wani
STAFF
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 6,609
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Kuch logon ko mirchian to wese boat lagi hoongiBhai wo noon leagi hy
U turn ley liya hoga
Beghair sochay samjhay baat karna inki adat hy
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,002
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Mujhay to abhi bhi iski tardeed par yakeen nahi kal hi isky leader ny apney apko indirectly mukti bahini sey tashbih di thiKuch logon ko mirchian to wese boat lagi hoongi
Burhan Wani
STAFF
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 6,609
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Kaun?
El Sidd
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 67,583
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
- Status
Similar threads
