What's new

Pakistan’s greatest cricket captain: Khan or Haq?

Pakistan’s greatest cricket captain

  • Imran Khan

  • Misbah


Results are only viewable after voting.
After getting Qadir selected, Khan asked him to grow a goatee. Not understanding why the skipper was asking him to grow a goatee, Khan told him that he would be introducing him (Qadir) to the English press as a ‘spinning magician’ and thus wanted him to ‘look like a wizard!’

:D

I don't find Misbah that fiery and aggressive as IK, article also refers to that, he is doing well with overall statistics but he has been unable to win us some world title, in fact his performance was the reason for us loosing twice at critical stage of the world championships.
 
Pakistan’s greatest cricket captain: Khan or Haq?
NADEEM F. PARACHA — PUBLISHED ABOUT AN HOUR AGO
56436419c980b.jpg

Till the appointment of Misbahul Haq as Pakistan’s cricket captain in 2011, former all-rounder, Imran Khan, was overwhelmingly remembered as the greatest captain ever to lead the Pakistan cricket side.

However, five years after Misbah’s elevation to the post of captaincy, he not only leveled the joint-record (of most Test victories as captain held by Imran and Javed Miandad), but, by the tail-end of 2015, Misbah has already added to his tally another 6 victories (compared to the 14 each by Khan and Miandad).

Misbah now has an impressive 20 Test wins under his belt, the most ever by a Pakistani Test captain.

But Misbah is a modest man. Whenever he is reminded of this feat of his, he almost always recoils and politely suggests that as a cricketer he is nowhere close to Khan or Miandad.

Though it has taken quite a while for Misbah’s prestige and fame (as skipper) to mushroom, there is now enough evidence to suggest that he may as well have become the country's greatest cricket captain.

Compared to the way Misbah’s fame as captain has slow-burned its way to the top, Imran Khan’s rise in this context was a lot swifter. But interestingly, both took over teams that were peppered with multiple problems.

Khan was appointed captain in 1982 at the age 0f 29. He had already established himself as a world class fast bowler and was on his way to becoming a quality all-rounder as well.

He was a regular member of the Pakistan team, having made his debut in the early 1970s as a lanky teenager.

Till his appointment, Khan had played his most formative cricket under the leadership of Mushtaq Mohammad who (between 1976 and 1979) became the country’s most successful Test skipper with 8 wins in 19 games.



5643602982b1d.jpg
Mushtaq and Imran, Sydney 1976. Khan played most of his formative cricket under Mushtaq.


However, in late 1979, Mushtaq was nudged out by the Pakistan cricket board (for losing form and ‘an advancing age’).

He was replaced by his friend and vice-captain, Asif Iqbal (who, ironically, was of the same age as Mushtaq, 36!).

Pakistan under Iqbal had a disastrous tour of India after which he promptly retired and was replaced by the then 23-year-old Javed Miandad.

Miandad’s appointment came as a surprise to the senior members of the team, so much so, that two years later (in early 1982), 10 regular members of the squad refused to play under him.

The rebellion was led by dashing opening batsman, Majid Khan, who, though, by then had lost much of his batting flair.

Another senior, Zaheer Abbas, sided with Majid and both convinced another eight members of the team to boycott Javed’s captaincy which they claimed was immature and ‘disrespectful’ to the seniors. Imran was one of the rebels.

The board sided with Miandad. But when a new-look Pakistan side almost lost a Test against a nascent Sri Lankan Test squad, Miandad agreed to step down on the condition that he would not play under Majid or Zaheer, both of who were expecting to be named captain after Miandad’s departure.

The board, in its pursuit to resolve the captaincy crisis, decided to think out of the box. It sprung a surprise by bypassing both Zaheer and Majid and named Imran Khan as captain.

Cricketing wisdom in those days suggested that fast bowlers never made good captains. However, this perception was somewhat negated when England’s quick bowler, Bob Willis, was made captain in 1982 and did quite well in his first series as skipper (against India in India).

Although Khan’s appointment took the players and the media by surprise, it baffled Khan too. After consulting with some of his closest friends (including legendary cricket commentator, Iftikhar Ahmad), Khan almost declined, only to accept the post just before Pakistan’s 1982 tour of England.

This meant Khan had to lead a team that was severely troubled by in-fighting and had in it some players who even refused to speak to each other.

What’s more, Khan hardly had any captaincy experience. He had only captained his university team at Oxford in the early 1970s.

However, in the next two years, Khan was more than successful in transforming the once bickering squad into a close-knit unit who turned winning into habit.



564360f4ecc77.jpg
Khan’s first assignment as skipper: The Pakistan team during the 1982 tour of England. (Standing from left): Iqbal Qasim, Mudassar Nazar, Salim Yousaf, Sikandar Bakht, Mohsin Khan, Tahir Naqqash, Mansoor Akhtar, Salim Malik, Haroon Rashid, Abdul Qadir. (Sitting from left): Wasim Raja, Wasim Bari, Majid Khan, Intikhab Alam (Manager), Imran Khan, Zaheer Abbas, Sarfraz Nawaz and Javed Miandad.


One of the main factors that contributed in helping Khan achieve this was the way his form as a bowler and batsman blossomed under pressure. Thus, he was able to win the respect of his teammates by leading from the front.

But Khan’s first era as captain almost entirely revolved around his imposing personality.

As an all-rounder he had rapidly evolved from being good to becoming great and this greatness permeated in him, a somewhat authoritarian and an almost dictatorial approach.



5643602962b7b.jpg
Khan and his merry men.


But, as long as he was able to perform well and lead from the front, the team willingly followed.

That is, until he broke down in 1983, and then quit cricket (for two years to rest a fractured shin).

With his exit the team just crumbled. In-fighting returned and so did players’ intrigues, again revolving around Zaheer and Javed, the two men who followed as captain after Khan’s exit.

Khan returned as skipper in 1986, his path cleared by Miandad’s second stepping-down moment – even though this time it was more voluntary.

Misbah too, took over a troubled squad. But unlike Khan, he was not even in the team when he was asked to lead.

Also, quite unlike the appointment of Khan, Misbah’s appointment as captain was initially a make-shift affair.

Misbah had made his Test debut in 2002 but was soon dropped. He was recalled to the side five years later in 2007.

In 2010, he was again dropped and was most likely to have remained in obscurity had three frontline Pakistani players (Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir), not decided to earn some extra bit of money by indulging in spot-fixing during Pakistan’s 2010 tour of England.

Butt was captain at the time, replacing Shahid Afridi, who had conveniently decided to retire from Test cricket after his team lost the first Test on the same English tour.

Disgraced by the spot-fixing scandal, hit by the resultant long bans on the tainted players, and unable to resolve a simmering tussle between various groupings in the squad, the cricket board returned to Misbah and requested him to lead the side for the 2011 series against South Africa.

It was a one-series-deal; a series played in the UAE because at the time, no foreign team was willing to tour Pakistan which, ever since the mid-2000s, found itself wedged by a deadly wave of extremist violence and instability.

In 1982, Imran had arrived (as captain) with an aggressive plan to turn Pakistan into an attacking side. He largely succeeded because by 1988, Pakistan (under Imran’s second stint as skipper), not only shot up to become the No: 1 Test side in the ICC rankings, but the team was also being universally praised as one of the most exciting squads of the era.

Misbah’s approach on the other hand, was a lot more cautious. Because when he took over as captain, the once celebrated belligerence and flamboyant unpredictability of the Pakistan cricket teams under Imran (and then of the Pakistan sides that followed his retirement in 1992), had stopped being seen as things to rejoice or endear.

Match-fixing scandals, in-fighting, captaincy tussles coupled with the rising tide of extremist violence and political instability in Pakistan had eroded the team’s once celebrated status of being an excitingly unpredictable side. The moniker actually began to be seen with suspicion and dismay.

That’s why Misbah’s approach was almost opposite to that of Khan’s.

5643602981b70.jpg
Khan led from his heart.

Khan had instilled unity and spirit into a disjointed side by encouraging flamboyance and aggression. He lead with his heart and in the process, realigned the team’s implosive disposition by channelising the player’s emotions towards achieving nobler cricketing pursuits, instead of attaining only those driven by their myopic self-interests.

Khan saw himself as a warrior-captain. Bold, forthright, leading from the front, he explained anything that disagreed with his approach as cowardice.

He had admired captains like Australia’s Ian Chappell. But, whereas, Chappell too, was warrior-like, he also had a sharp mind.

Khan had a good cricketing brain, but it was nowhere as potent as the heart with which he led the team and played the game.

This mind-gap in this respect was filled by the wily Javed Miandad who became Khan’s Vice Captain in 1986. According to Chappell, the Khan-Miandad nexus became one of the most powerful combinations on the cricket field.



5643602918d9a.jpg
Khan with his vice-captain, Javed Miandad.


Misbah came in as an outsider. Though untainted by the debris of what had befallen the team in his absence, he was quite alone.

Not only was he expected to restore order, but he also had to actually justify his return as a batsman.

Misbah, in this respect was like Mr. Spock (the extremely rational and unemotional Vulcan in Star Trek).

As a captain he came in as a detached and stoic Vulcan to lead a team of passionate, warlike but wayward Klingons!

He knew well that no matter how he would want to restore his version of order in a highly instable and tainted team, he would first and foremost have to win the respect of his teammates by leading from the front.

Looking back, it is remarkable how well the then 36-year-old returnee managed to do this, finding his batting form, and gradually becoming the central figure around which the team’s batting would begin to revolve on a consistent basis.



56436028e4d54.jpg
Misbah: Rational, circumspect, stoic.


Whereas, Khan had nurtured spontaneous and rugged talent because it strengthened his vision of constructing a warrior-like unit driven by unorthodox abilities and unabashed passions, Misbah groomed players that he believed had the nerve and discipline to stoically but resolutely face the rigours and pressures of international cricket.

For example, Khan would bank on the unorthodox thinking of Miandad; fight to get in eccentric leggies such as Abdul Qadir; and influence the budding of raw talent that would lead to the shaping of brilliant fast bowlers such as Wasim Akram, Waqar Younas and Aquib Javed.

On and off the field Khan’s protégés became quite like him: Flamboyant, unabashedly passionate, provocative and having a penchant for living in the fast lane.



56436028ccd9c.jpg
Khan’s protégés: Akram, Waqar and Aquib (1988).
It always will be Imran. And reason is he was first captain to tell team to play to win the match not Draw. He was first one to bring confidence in team that we can win against any one
 
I would say Imran, because he had a legacy, nourished and groomed a lot of WORLD CLASS, not best but THE BEST players under him. I do not need to mention the names as anyone following cricket know these legends!
:)
Misbah with his tactical approach makes a winning captain but lacks that flare that we associated with Imran! That attacking approach,, they were called cornered tigers at that time and it was not without a reason.
 
It always will be Imran. And reason is he was first captain to tell team to play to win the match not Draw. He was first one to bring confidence in team that we can win against any one
What you have said is true but i would like to add a thing to it. Imran had quality players playing under him and they needed a spark which was imran. Misbah on the other hand had players who were mediocre at best and he made a mediocre pakistan team with a win percentage of less than 50% since 2005 to 2010 at home into a world beating side again. The way he made up for a lack of fast bowlers who were always the backbone of this team was incredible. Both are legends of pakistan hut i rate misbah slightly above imran.
 
While Imran had himself, Wasim and Waqar on his team what does misbah has no match winning fast bowler and he even lost Ajmal. in my views Niazi II is more successful captain
 
I would say Imran, because he had a legacy, nourished and groomed a lot of WORLD CLASS, not best but THE BEST players under him. I do not need to mention the names as anyone following cricket know these legends!
:)
Misbah with his tactical approach makes a winning captain but lacks that flare that we associated with Imran! That attacking approach,, they were called cornered tigers at that time and it was not without a reason.

He did not nourish anyone. Wasim/Waqar was a talent, same can be said about Tendulkar also. Someone groomed him but is it reality ? Misbah is the one who performed under pressure. Pakistanis kept on mocking him but he did his job. Imran had a good team whereas Misbah had mean players like Lala, YK, Akmal brothers who were just playing for themselves and not for the team. Hell lot of politics was there. We lost players because of match fixing. Misbah kept cool and now see people who were abusing him are asking who was better... When I say people I am not talking about OP but Pakistan public in general.
 
Imran was with superstar and Haq is with stars and still become most successful capt of Pakistan.

Heh+you+figured+it+out+my+hats+off+to+you+_e7638c8aac758f45e5f60eb77b264195.jpg
 
No doubt Misbah is a great batsman and a very good captain but I think the only Pakistani captain comparable to Imran Khan is Wasim Akram (during his second captaincy tenure). We should also remember that Misbah won many matches on the dull pitches of UAE while the team performed very well under Imran Khan and Wasim Akram even in difficult conditions of Australia.
 
Both captains served their country very well but Misbhah took the captaincy under a difficult circumstances and took us out of the mess. So I rank Misbhah slightly higher than khan.
 
Can't compare because , during 70's 80's and 90's , Test cricket was the real test

Player quality was higher.

Imran beat , England in England , and India in India that was never done before
  • And players were focused on offense/defense
  • Quality of cricketers in England was higher , West Indies had world class players
  • No limit on bouncers
  • Pakistani team routinely scored mediocre batting results in tests 155 runs, 160 runs in test cricket used to be normal runs for Pakistani team 250 used to be great work
  • I think also the ball was allowed to get older , so 2nd Innings totals were always less then first innings vs now a days they change ball every 20-30 overs so you don't see reverse swing in action as much as before

Misbah's Pakistan , faces cricketers who are 20/20 players who can't score more then 30 runs and there is no Ricky Ponting

Misbah's Pakistan team has better trained batsmen coming out of academies, better technique vs Pakistani batsmen of old who were more less street cricketers


However Misbah's performance is as good as Imran in term of achivement not less


I also like Inzi's venture as Captain, he was a superb fighter when his team needed him to score big in test

Test cricket can be ranked up again if they increase the payouts more per series
as real , caliber of performance is Test

20/20 is joke


Zimbabway
Bangladesh

Were not active in Imran time otherwise , he would have beaten then 10 times each for 20 extra test wins
 
Last edited:
Do a drill please...Blank your mind...no thoughts of any sort...and suddenly bring in the words "PAKISTAN CRICKET" and the first reactionary name or image that would pop up or flash in your mind would be of "IMRAN KHAN". That is the "LITMUS TEST" of being "THE GREAT". Pakistan has produced geniuses in every field, wonderful scientists but why the first name that flashes in our minds when we think of a Pakistani scientist is A.Q KHAN??? this is because they are the people who introduced this nation to its potential of GREATNESS dormant within it. I am not discrediting Misbah, he has done wonders for Pakistan and is still carrying on with that but IMHO for comparison one should have similar type of personalities, whereas, Imran Khan and Misbah ul Haq are two different people with different circumstances, different resources and different approaches...As fas as i am concerned i feel really proud of both of them coz both are my Tribesman.
 
He did not nourish anyone. Wasim/Waqar was a talent
You failed to understand his point. Back in the days the art of reverse swing was only known by Imran and a few others, he was the one who taught this art to the likes of Wasim and Waqar-it made them the deadly bowlers they became. This is what he meant by 'nourishing them'. Wasim Akram and Waqar have always given a huge credit to Imran, he was their role model, he saw potential and made these two superstars. Let's not forget the likes of Akib Javed here.
I would say Imran, because he had a legacy, nourished and groomed a lot of WORLD CLASS, not best but THE BEST players under him. I do not need to mention the names as anyone following cricket know these legends!
:)
Misbah with his tactical approach makes a winning captain but lacks that flare that we associated with Imran! That attacking approach,, they were called cornered tigers at that time and it was not without a reason.
Imran did inspire generations, wait and watch the legacy Misbah leaves.
 
In tests - Misbah ul Haq.

In ODIs - Imran Khan

Overall - Imran Khan.


Misbah is still an ordinary ODI batsman and captain. He left his ODI team at number 7 with several back to back series losses. Misbah wasn't too good in T20s either. He's only good in Tests.

IK on the other hand was equally good in Tests & ODIs during his time. Remember Pakistan team under Imran Khan was the only team that defeated West Indies in WI, after 16 years in a test match. The only team that gave mighty windies of 80s challenging tough time.

He did not nourish anyone. Wasim/Waqar was a talent, same can be said about Tendulkar also. Someone groomed him but is it reality ? Misbah is the one who performed under pressure. Pakistanis kept on mocking him but he did his job. Imran had a good team whereas Misbah had mean players like Lala, YK, Akmal brothers who were just playing for themselves and not for the team. Hell lot of politics was there. We lost players because of match fixing. Misbah kept cool and now see people who were abusing him are asking who was better... When I say people I am not talking about OP but Pakistan public in general.



:lol:

Go watch interviews of Wasim and Waqar and see what these guys say about Imran Khan.

The coup that wasn't - Pakistan's tour of West Indies 1987/88


West Indies had gone a decade without losing a Test at home. Then along came Imran Khan and Co.


The home record of West Indies in the 1980s was awe-inspiring. In 1987-88, Pakistan arrived to play a team that had not lost a series in 15 years, or a Test in ten. A whole generation had grown up not knowing what defeat meant. The Pakistanis were up against habit as much as anything else. Yet they were the most fancied to turn the tide. Imran Khan, the captain, had been persuaded by the country's President, Zia ul-Haq, to come out of retirement. Javed Miandad, who knew he would not be spoken of in hushed tones if he didn't have a century in the West Indies against his name, was waiting to set the record straight.

"After that series," wrote Miandad, "I finally came to terms with my insecurities about scoring overseas. The comments from my detractors ceased. Imran had always been reluctant to hand it to me as a batsman. But after that tour he did."

These two men (Imran & Miandad) were the heroes in a series that ended 1-1, but should have gone Pakistan's way if not for the spotty umpiring in the final Test, when the ninth-wicket pair of Jeff Dujon and Winston Benjamin took West Indies to victory.

Imran finished with 23 wickets, and Miandad made two centuries. Part-time bowlers Shoaib Mohammad and Mudassar Nazar took wickets at crucial times thanks to Imran going by instinct and giving them spells; Abdul Qadir punched a spectator who had been riling him and was forced to settle out of court; and it all ended with the West Indies captain, Viv Richards, in tears.

There was no hint of the drama to come when Pakistan lost the one-day series 0-5. The Test series began in Georgetown, Guyana. West Indies were without Richards and Malcolm Marshall, and were led by Gordon Greenidge.

Imran stamped his name on the series with seven wickets on the first day, including a spell of 4 for 9 in three overs, as West Indies fell for 292. Pakistan ended day two 33 behind, but with six wickets in hand. Miandad, unbeaten on 96 overnight, was immobile on 99 for 38 minutes on the third morning before his first century against West Indies, his 16th overall.

The pace battery comprised Courtney Walsh, Curtly Ambrose, Patrick Patterson and Winston Benjamin. "I taunted the bowlers," wrote Miandad, "I pointed my chest to Ambrose, 'Try and hit me and I'll show you,' I told him." Benjamin "bowled an over in which he delivered six bouncers. Shoaib came down the wicket to tell me that Winston was deliberately no-balling, releasing the ball some yards past the crease, trying to bowl as threatening a delivery as he could."

In all, West Indies conceded 71 extras, a world record. Pakistan finished with 435, helped by a spirited 62 from their wicketkeeper, Saleem Yousuf. An infected toe prevented Imran from bowling more than two overs in the final session, but the rest day and antibiotics allowed him to play a crucial role on the fourth day, when he dismissed Greenidge and Gus Logie. He then turned to the seldom-used offbreaks of Shoaib, who picked up Dujon and Benjamin off successive deliveries.

"It didn't surprise me when we lost in the first Test," said Richie Richardson, who showed he was a master of logic: "You had two good teams competing, and if one doesn't play too well then the other comes up trumps."


I taunted the bowlers. I pointed my chest to Ambrose,
'Try and hit me and I'll show you,'
I told him Javed Miandad


Or, they could both have played well and finished with a draw. As in the second Test, in Port-of-Spain, where Pakistan needed the batting skills of the last man, Qadir, to keep their lead in the series alive. Either team could have won in the final session. Qadir saw out five deliveries from Viv Richards after a second century by Miandad had brought Pakistan to the threshold. Miandad fell with 84 runs needed to win from 20 overs (the target was 372, 71 more than Pakistan had ever made in a fourth innings before).

Richards and Marshall were back for this game, but Imran and Qadir dismissed West Indies for under 200 again in the first innings, giving Pakistan the initial advantage. But Pakistan managed a lead of only 20 runs, and West Indies came into their own in the second innings. Centuries from Richards and Dujon took them to 391 and set up a dramatic finish. Things got tense on day three when Richards threateningly waved his bat at Yousuf after an appeal for lbw off Imran's bowling was rejected by the umpire. The situation was soon defused, though.

When Qadir bowled Marshall, it was his 200th wicket, but Dujon added 90 runs for the last two wickets with Benjamin and Walsh. Again it was Imran (five) and Qadir (four) who were the successful bowlers. With Pakistan chasing, Miandad added 113 for the sixth wicket with 19-year-old Ijaz Ahmed. They finished with 341 for 9.

The final Test was in Bridgetown. "They had threatened to prepare a greentop all through, and when we arrived at the Oval (Barbados), it was a greentop," said opener Ramiz Raja. Pakistan were put in. "Straightaway Marshall shot two bouncers across my head. We were in no mood to be defensive, and both Shoaib Mohammad and I played our shots," Ramiz remembered.

Once again the teams finished the first innings on almost level terms, West Indies making 306 to Pakistan's 309. Shoaib top scored for Pakistan in both innings, and there was a thrilling stand of 67 for the eighth wicket between Salim Yousuf and Wasim Akram, who put on 50 in five overs. Then, attempting to hook Marshall, Yousuf deflected the ball onto his face and broke his nose, leaving Aamer Malik to keep wicket.

West Indies were 198 for 3 when Mudassar dismissed Desmond Haynes and Logie with successive balls. Dujon was run out one run later. The tail rallied, though, and when Pakistan were reduced to 177 for 6 at the end of day three, it seemed all over for them.

On the fourth morning, Imran and Yousuf - who batted with a runner because he was still dizzy from the blow - added 52 for the eighth wicket. By close of play it was even again: Pakistan, dismissed for 262, had hit back to remove Haynes, Greenidge, Richie Richardson, Carl Hooper and Logie. West Indies needed another 112.

Ambrose and Richards fell in the first half hour on the final day, but things were beginning to go wrong for Pakistan. "After Wasim had got rid of Ambrose and Richards, I had Marshall plumb lbw on the back foot to a flipper, but the umpire turned down the appeal," recalled Qadir. Still, when Dujon and Benjamin came together, West Indies, needing another 59 to win, were 207 for 8. If the Pakistanis were celebrating, it was understandable - but it turned out to be premature.

"We would have wrapped up the game but a couple of crucial umpiring decisions robbed us of victory," wrote Miandad. "We would have been successful if it was not for the poor umpiring that spoilt our chances in the end," Qadir agreed. They had surprising support from Benjamin. "I thought Pakistan were a bit unlucky not to have got the benefit of that Dujon bat-and-pad catch," he said.


"I thought that towards the end of the match the umpire was no-balling me unnecessarily, allowing Benjamin to go for big shots," said Qadir, who was also involved in a fracas with a spectator who kept taunting him as he fielded on the boundary. Qadir punched the man and had to later pay US$1000 in an out-of-court settlement.


Benjamin recalled how he, hearing the wicketkeeper telling Qadir, "legbreak, googly, flipper," started repeating the order to himself. Luckily for Benjamin, Qadir didn't change the sequence, and having predicted the googly correctly, Benjamin hit the winning boundary off it.

Wisden said of the series, "The umpiring, except for a few debatable decisions, was good." Imran agreed only in part: "Unfortunately, during the second innings of the Bridgetown Test, we were disappointed. Three vital mistakes went against us."

"It probably represents some of the best cricket that's ever been played anywhere," wrote Miandad.

The final word must belong to Benjamin. "When I saw our captain crying in the dressing room at the end of the game, I realised how much it meant to him. To see the great Viv Richards in tears made me realise what cricket meant to him and how important this win was for West Indies."

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

The coup that wasn't | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo


-----


Only 3 men (Imran, Miandad & Qadir), with a young inexperienced team fought against a team of mighty Windies of 80s, that didn't taste a test loss at home for ever a decade. They not only defeated them in first test, but came close to a touching distance of winning the series 2-1. 3 crucial umpiring decisions went against Pakistan during final session of final test, that tilted the match towards WI.


Imran Khan finished as hightest wicket taker with 26 scalps, and Miandad ended as leading run scorer in the series. He even played a test match with injured toe and refused to sit out or take rest.
 
Last edited:
What you have said is true but i would like to add a thing to it. Imran had quality players playing under him and they needed a spark which was imran. Misbah on the other hand had players who were mediocre at best and he made a mediocre pakistan team with a win percentage of less than 50% since 2005 to 2010 at home into a world beating side again. The way he made up for a lack of fast bowlers who were always the backbone of this team was incredible. Both are legends of pakistan hut i rate misbah slightly above imran.



The only quality player that Imran got was Miandad, most of the rest of the players got a slot in the team because of Imran Khan.

Abdul Qadir
Wasim Akram
Waqar Yunas
Inzimam ul Haq

etc are just a few to name. Abdul Qadir was rejected by the selectors, and during those years all the leg spinners were on decline. Imran spotted him, and fought with selectors to have him in the team. Look what Qadir went on to become. Similarly Wasim, Waqar & Inzi.
 
The only quality player that Imran got was Miandad, most of the rest of the players got a slot in the team because of Imran Khan.

Abdul Qadir
Wasim Akram
Waqar Yunas
Inzimam ul Haq

etc are just a few to name. Abdul Qadir was rejected by the selectors, and during those years all the leg spinners were on decline. Imran spotted him, and fought with selectors to have him in the team. Look what Qadir went on to become. Similarly Wasim, Waqar & Inzi.

Imran Khan always had a great eye in finding out talents, if it wasn't for Imran Khan, we would never have known about about the great Wasim and Waqar or Inzimam. And Abdul Qadir was just brilliant.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom