What's new

Pakistan Rekindles Interest in HQ-9/FD-2000 SAM.

FD2000b with 200Km range
494bb226092ceb4406badd1a1dd20993.jpg
 
https://www.armyrecognition.com/chi...data_sheet_specifications_pictures_video.html

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-HQ-9-FD-FT-2000.html#mozTocId577665

Anti ballistic missile capabilities

HQ-9/FD-2000/FT-2000 Technical Data

FD-2000 / HQ-9 SAM Characteristics2
Operational Range (Aircraft Target)
7 - 125 km

Operational Altitude (Aircraft Target) 25 m - 27 km

Operational Range (Cruise Missile Target) 7 - 15 km

Operational Altitude (Cruise Missile Target) >25 m

Operational Range (Ballistic Missile Target) 7 - 25 km

Operational Altitude (Ballistic Missile Target) 2 - 15 km

Operational Range (Supersonic Missile Target) 7 - 50 km

Operational Altitude (Supersonic Missile Target) 1 - 18 km



FT-2000 Anti-Radiation SAM Characteristics (CNPMIEC)
Operational Range
12 - 100 km
Operational Altitude
3 - 20 km
Missile Weight
1,300 kg
Missile Length
6.8 m
Missile Diameter
0.446 m
Seeker Band Coverage
2 to 18 GHz

Cited kinematic performance typically falls in between the SA-10C and SA-20A, making the HQ-9 systems credible equivalents to various MIM-104 Patriot variants.

Chinese sources claim that the HQ-9 family of systems employ much newer computing technology than imported Russian S-300PMU/PMU1/PMU2 systems. This suggests a equal or superior computing capability for signal processing, data processing and guidance support.
 
Last edited:
We need more than 250 range sam 125 is nothing if compare to s 400 range
 
More hq 16s especially latest B version.
 
Putting all eggs in chinese pot is stupudity better bought S 350 more capable than these toys

No S 350 is more superior in tech
 
If you want to india regret s 400.... Go for ABM. Basic one

Unlike Pakistan india neither has nuclear capable cruise missiles or trajectory hoping capacity or MIRV.. They are vulnerable
 

Back
Top Bottom