What's new

Pakistan Airforce Procurement plans after 2001- Myths and Realities

SQ8

INACTIVE
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Messages
40,834
Reaction score
519
Country
United States
Location
United States
Introductory Disclaimer:
A lot has been written on the future plans of the Pakistan Air Force and much more has been speculated with complete disregard for even the slightest of factual hypothetical (if there was ever a term like that possible) or even the basic tenets of logic. We have relatively young/new members going ahead and speculating based on what are nothing more than piecemeal ideas thrown out as public press releases by various branches of Pakistan’s political establishment within the civilian government that deal with the military. If the track record is anything to go by, then we can safely assume that most if not all of the information is based on interpretation of basic concepts or ideas given to them by what are essentially the real decision-makers within the Pakistani military.

On the opposite end of the spectrum we have certain members who based on both seniority and time spent on the forum are basing their ideals on either a picture of gloom and doom or the best case hodgepodge of possible facts and misunderstood figures.

While I am not going to claim be an expert in the subject at all am not trying to impose my opinion upon anybody; I will try to elaborate on certain known information and possible unknown known information that quietly circulates the web and is generally unseen (the correct term should be undecipherable). This information is not based on any insight sources for the time being. Since these regardless of how accurate these may or may not be. It is also based on my word and as far as I’m concerned, even for myself, my word on online forums means zilch.

I will not be looking to point out any sources for this because those who had not bothered to do the research to find resources should have the focus to go around and look at what is public knowledge (if only the public would look at it). This sounds rather arrogant, but it is in fact a resignation from my end regarding attempts to justify claims both for Pakistan’s and the more rabid and generally cynical kind that we get from across the border.

I’m not going to go beyond the early 2000’s to try and chart out what transpired. For the Pakistan air force post September 11, 2001. I will only disclose that since the PAF has already published a generally honest history of the 10 years between 1988 to 1998 , which includes its attempts to procure modern combat aircraft to supplant its increasingly obsolete fleet after the procurement of the F-16s via the United States fell through.

Instead, I will focus on what happened immediately after September 11. What is not known is that as soon as the Twin Towers fell there was a lot of speculation as to where the United States was going next. As it became clear where the problem lay and how the Pakistani intelligence services may be indirectly implicated as having ties to the enemy, regardless of their ignorance and innocence when it came to the events of September 11. Many had speculated that the United States may decide to take a wide spread intervention, both in Afghanistan and perhaps carry out intimidating strikes within Pakistan itself. With the capitulation of Gen Musharraf to the very brash and direct threats from the US government put Pakistan squarely on the side of the “good guys”. The resulting opening up of markets, which included those from the defence sector gave the generally cautious and under confident procurement departments of the Pakistani military a chance to flex their options.


Before going further on why Pakistan chose its current (easily changeable) air force upgrade plans. It is important to look into the late 80s and the perceived impact seen by Pakistani intelligentsia on its word relations with regards to its nuclear weapons program. The super seven program was born, not just to create a local aviation industry within Pakistan . But also to allow a controllable source of air power that could be projected regardless of any dip or rise in relations with the well-known suppliers of defence equipment. To sum it up as succinctly as possible; the super seven or JF 17 program has nothing to do with any potential procurement from sources abroad and can be placed on a relative scale of importance to Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions. It is considered as a lifeline in case Pakistan ends up being outcast out of the world arena again.

Pre-2001:
The Pakistani fleet prior to September 11, comprised mostly of outdated but somewhat effective, Mirage fighter bombers, 40 odd older F-16 models, Chinese facsimiles of the Mig-21C and the tail end occupied by completely obsolete and ineffective Chinese mig-19 facsimiles. A good number of Mirage aircraft were updated with somewhat modern avionics which multiplied the effectiveness and greatly, including the utilization of a very limited number of beyond visual range missiles (with the very restrictive employment parameters).
A number of Chengdu F7MG fighters were being procured as a stopgap measure to replace the Mig-19 aircraft. These aircraft were to be used in air superiority scenarios using Ambush and embedded tactics that could utilize the relatively good manoeuvrability of this platform. However, these were still in the process of delivery and induction.

While the F-16s were considered the most effective type in the fleet, the combat availability of these aircraft was generally suspect beyond the first few days of a conflict. This was aptly demonstrated during the 2001 stand-off between Pakistan and India in which a key requirement laid in the emergency spares by Pakistan to the United States was for the F-16.

Post-2001:
Right after September 11, the regrouping staff of the Pakistani air force (having lost some of its best officers to an air crash that same year), huddled around to evaluate the new options based on the incoming aid and the rebounding economy propped up by the technocrats. It was a consensus among the military leadership that Pakistan was about to become a competitive market for many vendors and the best way to attract the maximum attention of potential suppliers was to hold a defence exposition (IDEAS).

However, since the JF 17 program was now in full swing and some of the key decision makers in the Pakistani force were convinced that it was to form the backbone of the PAF as it brought with it the potential to form an effective air defence fighter; it was decided to focus on the glaring lack of an effective strike element within the Pakistani force.

Since the Pakistani air force had been operating the Lockheed Martin F-16 (then Gen dynamics) for almost 18 years, its first focus was to use that existing knowledge of operating what was still a very effective aircraft (in its latest guise) by inducting a number of used airframes to complete its original staff plan of having 110 F-16s forming a multi role backbone for the PAF. This was considered the most potent way to quickly regain lost ground (of which there was a lot) against its primary threat in India. Hence, the F-16 procurement programme was put immediately back on track in the months that followed the unofficial declaration of alliance with the United States. Since this process required the approval of the US Congress and Senate, budgetary allocations were made to accommodate the time required for this process.

While the F-16 was a very effective strike fighter; it was deemed it necessary based on previous experience to have a second are strike platform that could still operate well into a week of a conflict in case (which is considered a certainty) of sanctions applied by the United States due to a conflict. In addition, it was considered that the United States may not allow the purchase of a refuelling aircraft that would allow the F-16s to strike deep within the heart of Indian territory, as was required (However, the US supplied per the Pakistani request the latest generation F-16 that it could export to Pakistan with conformal fuel tanks that accommodated the range requirement)

Having evaluated and selected the Mirage 2000-5 as its primary strike element in the early 90s, the Pakistan air force was then and in 2001 convinced that the aircraft met its requirements perfectly.

In addition, the Pakistan air force had also evaluated multiple other aircraft during the sanction years, which included the Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale, SU 27, Mig-29 and had been given the chance to get first impressions of the Chinese J 10 fighter.

As they had decided on the Mirage 2000 – 5, the Pakistan air force approached the idea of meeting other vendors at the exposition as a cursory exercise. The French, however, refused to offer the Mirage 2000 and instead insisted that the Pakistan air force purchased the Rafale instead. While many conspiracy theories will be thrown about regarding the leadership of Pakistan military and its role in terms of kickbacks and corruption in trying to rig the procurement of new equipment; none of these wild (but not entirely baseless) ideas hold any salt when it comes to the selection of Pakistan’s new fighter.

Faced with a dilemma of being unable to purchase the Mirage 2000 and unable to afford the Rafale in the numbers it wanted, and unable to secure a guarantee of spares from the partner nations in the Eurofighter programme; the Pakistan air force decided to look for an out-of-the-box solution.

As they had already taken a look at the Chinese J 10 fighter and been given a preview of their plans to upgrade that aircraft, the Pakistan air force put forward a requirement to the Chengdu aircraft Corporation for modifications to the J 10 that would allow it to favourably compare with the Mirage 2000 in a strike role. In addition, just as with the JF 17 programme and other defence procurement from China; the aircraft was available immediately via a soft loan from the Chinese.

The timeline for these events is end of 2004 post the IDEAS exposition where the talks for the Mirage 2000 finally fell through. At this time the Pakistan air force was about to put on concrete plans for procuring 150 JF 17 aircraft (as the programme was maturing enough and the Pakistan air force was confident of its abilities to form the backbone of its fleet), 36 new F-16 block 52+ fighters, 45 used F-16 fighters and 48 Pakistan specific J-10 Variants. The used F-16s were to be upgraded equivalent avionics to the newer aircraft. The goal was to have by the year 2020 a fleet comprising of 110 F-16s, 110-125 JF-17s, 48-60 J-10, 60 F-7PG and 48 upgraded Mirage V strike aircraft. This would bring Pakistan air force to its desired level of around 350 combat aircraft. In addition, there was a procurement of force multiplying elements such as airborne early warning and control, airborne ground surveillance, multi layered ground-based air defence system , and unmanned intelligence gathering platforms.

The effect of the 2005 earthquake in Kashmir cannot be understated. The financial resources which were then allocated for the purchase of equipment were redirected (both justly and unjustly) two words relief and rehabilitation of the region (of which is substantial amount of money was lost to corruption). The PAF was forced to cut back the timeline for its procurement of its 36 new F-16 fighters and it chose to keep 18 as a future budgetary opening. In the years that followed, the economic policies of the technocrats lost their effectiveness at the same time when external aid was made more restrictive in its use available to the Pakistan military. However, the actual damage to the military procurement programs was undertaken during the disastrous and corruption ridden period that followed in the civilian government post Musharraf.

A systematic cannibalisation of the Pakistani state’s economic abilities was undertaken to feed the self-serving requirements of the rulers during that period. Any revenue that the state was generating was immediately directed to the offers of the ruling party, along with a scripting of any monetary “meat” from the proverbial skeleton of the Pakistani economy. The resulting deficit in the budget left the Pakistan air force scrambling to even provide basic maintenance for its aircraft. Within two years of the Pakistan People’s party government, it was clear that the PAF’s plans were finished and the best it could hope for was to sustain the programmes it had already made payments for.

This meant that by 2011 the Pakistan air force had settled on a last resort figure of 80 F-16s(both new and old), 150 Jf-17s and 50 F-7PGs by 2020. A total of 280 combat aircraft and a far cry from the ambitions it held for the higher 300 figure just a few years ago.

Yet all hope was not lost, and it was characteristic of the ever optimistic Pakistani consider a better economic turn where they would be able to exercise the options for more new and used F-16 fighters to bolster their strength until they were able to undertake the procurement of the fifth generation combat aircraft, which was to be around the mid 2020s.

In the years that followed, the focus was to try and keep up with the loan payments to be made to various lenders (with the major being in China, followed by Sweden and certain private sector lenders). This was done so that the credit rating for the Pakistan air force as a customer would improve among potential suppliers and procure more equipment if the opportunity would present itself.

Based on the latest reports that are available which includes those via the Ministry of Defence production, popular aviation journals and new sites, along with official announcements; the following picture for procurement by the Pakistan air force appears:

The JF 17 programme is performing better than expected and is being relied upon to supplement those that were previously considered specific to the F-16 fleet. This has allowed greater flexibility to purchase ancillary equipment such as surface-to-air missiles, electronic warfare systems, intelligence gathering Systems, along with stockpiling a very large number of spares for the F-16 fleet to allow it to operate even under the duress of sanctions.

The marginal improvement from the dire economic straits a a few years ago, along with the more pertinent investment shown by the Chinese has allowed the Pakistan air force to focus on multiple sources to procure secondary defence systems that are to be integrated with its air defence and long-range strike options. This also includes options to improve the airlift capability and infrastructure improvements.

Yet, there is no proof not anything beyond piecemeal statements given by civilian officials called in general are ignorant of military matters in Pakistan of any concrete development in procuring a new platform. As for now, the Pakistan air force is set on ensuring that by 2020 It will have a fleet that comprises of 80-90 F-16, 150 JF-17, 60 F-7PG and 36-48 Upgraded Mirage variants. It has decided to focus its resources on the development and procurement of a fifth-generation fighter which it intends to conduct by 2025.

To allow for any changes that can be interpreted by concrete evidence available within the news and other reliable and publicly open resources, I will be updating this from time to time.

Addendum 1:

The J-10 Procurement was abandoned entirely due to the budgetary restrictions that arose out of the post 2008 financial crises( having very little relation to the global crises) that the PAF faced along with the projected usefulness of the aircraft vis a vis limited budget diminishing over the years.

A J-10 would have been useful in 2016 but not in 2020.


@ghazi768 @Bilal Khan 777 @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Manticore

Any factual inaccuracies may be pointed out at will and appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Clauses in AFDP 2019 plan for PAF can also give a relatively good idea as it gave plans for modernisation from 2006 to 2019.
 
Well I still have a lingering question in the back of my head regarding the J 10. Why was a procurement program which was in full swing come to an abrupt halt? There was this J 10 B being readied according to Pakistani inputs. Was it on technical grounds? or was it because of Finance? Was engine a main problem?
 
A really good read. If possible PAF would try and get the remaining F16s from Jordan pending US approval(if that ever comes!!!). However in general the report by @Oscatr is faultless. Perhaps one other aspect which you could elaborate on is what happened to the j10s.
A
 
A detailed insight and good read about what really happen that includes the reason about J-10 not procured in those times. This insight pretty much validates the projected upgrade and induction of fleet and not the dream list that can be speculated to any level/number/name. Indeed the constrains forced PAF with such numbers and brands and hopes are high that we may back to track of advancement and modernization as said in OP. Thanks for the share @Oscar .
 
Well I still have a lingering question in the back of my head regarding the J 10. Why was a procurement program which was in full swing come to an abrupt halt? There was this J 10 B being readied according to Pakistani inputs. Was it on technical grounds? or was it because of Finance? Was engine a main problem?

From what i heard, finance was the major factor which caused the delay / cancellation.

But may be a more informed insider can have an insight into the issue.
 
A really good read. If possible PAF would try and get the remaining F16s from Jordan pending US approval(if that ever comes!!!). However in general the report by @Oscatr is faultless. Perhaps one other aspect which you could elaborate on is what happened to the j10s.
A

U must take into consideration Pakistan limited defence budget.

J-10 is far more expensive per unit given the bigger and more expensive AL-31F engines. Pakistan AF intend to replace all its A-5, Mirage III with something cheaper price unit. They need to have 250units to do the replacing.

I don't even think PLAAF operate 250 J-10units at that moment.(before 2007-9)

JF-17 is the best option for them. Plus , dew to technology transfer which Pakistan is able to learn alot of aircraft manufacturing thru this project and at the same time replace most of its aging air fleet.

It's killing 2 birds with a stone. If Pakistan is able to market successful FC-1 together with AVIC. It may even earn a small fortune to subsidise its JF-17 fleet.

JF-17 is not a bad bird after all. I saw some CCTV video of FC-1 going thru test and real air flight. It has some stunning performance of short and steep take off. Sharp turn and high maneouvre. More or less can give u some info on how good these plane is.

One Pakistan Test pilot even comment JF-17 is as good as F-16A in aerial performance.
Now jfb or block 3 will better avionics,engine and other 4++ upgraded bird will give strength and confidence of PAC capabilities for future
PAC gave strength to paf by providing jf 17 fleet on short time to make backbone of paf fleet
Now pak may acquire couples of fleet of su or mirages
As pak is looking fwd for 5+ generation jet like with TFX and most probably with Chinese 5+ in future
Introductory Disclaimer:
A lot has been written on the future plans of the Pakistan Air Force and much more has been speculated with complete disregard for even the slightest of factual hypothetical (if there was ever a term like that possible) or even the basic tenets of logic. We have relatively young/new members going ahead and speculating based on what are nothing more than piecemeal ideas thrown out as public press releases by various branches of Pakistan’s political establishment within the civilian government that the use of the military. If the track record is anything to go by, then we can safely assume that most if not all of the information is based on interpretation of basic concepts or in them by what are essentially the real decision-makers within the Pakistani military.

On the opposite end of the spectrum we have certain members who based on both seniority and time spent on the forum are basing their ideals on either a picture of gloom and doom or the best case hodgepodge of possible facts and misunderstood figures.

What are not going to be an expert in the subject at all and when they are not try to impose my opinion upon anybody; I will try to elaborate on certain known information and possible unknown known information that quietly circulates the web and is generally unseen (the correct term should be undecipherable). This information is not based on any insight sources for the time being. Since these regardless of how accurate these may or may not be. It is also based on my word and as far as I’m concerned, even for myself, my word on online forums means zilch.

I will not be looking to point out any sources for this because those who had not bothered to do the research to find resources should have the focus to go around and look at what is public knowledge (if only the public would look at it). This sounds rather arrogant, but it is in fact a resignation from my end regarding attempts to justify claims both for Pakistan’s and the more rabid and generally cynical kind that we get from across the border.

I’m not going to go beyond the early 2000’s to try and chart out what transpired. For the Pakistan air force post September 11, 2001. I will only disclose that since the PAF has already published a generally honest history of the 10 years between 1988 to 1998 , which includes its attempts to procure modern combat aircraft to supplant its increasingly obsolete fleet after the procurement of the F-16s via the United States fell through.

Instead, I will focus on what happened immediately after September 11. What is not known is that as soon as the Twin Towers fell there was a lot of speculation as to where the United States was going next. As it became clear where the problem lay and how the Pakistani intelligence services may be indirectly implicated as having ties to the enemy, regardless of their ignorance and innocence when it came to the events of September 11. Many had speculated that the United States may decide to take a wide spread intervention, both in Afghanistan and perhaps carry out intimidating strikes within Pakistan itself. With the capitulation of Gen Musharraf to the very brash and direct threats from the US government would Pakistan squarely on the side of the “good guys”. The resulting opening up of markets, which included those from the defence sector gave the generally cautious and under confident procurement departments of the Pakistani military a chance to flex their options.


Before going further on why Pakistan chose its current (easily changeable) air force upgrade plans. It is important to look into the late 80s and the perceived impact seen by Pakistani intelligentsia on its word relations with regards to its nuclear weapons program. The super seven program was born, not just to create a local aviation industry within Pakistan . But also to allow a controllable source of air power that could be projected regardless of any dip or rise in relations with the well-known suppliers of defence equipment. To sum it up as succinctly as possible; the super seven or JF 17 program has nothing to do with any potential procurement from sources abroad and can be placed on a relative scale of importance to Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions. It is considered as a lifeline in case Pakistan ends up being outcast out of the world arena again.

Pre-2001:
The Pakistani fleet prior to September 11, comprised mostly of outdated but somewhat effective, Mirage fighter bombers, 40 odd older F-16 models, Chinese facsimiles of the Mig-21C and the tail end occupied by completely obsolete and ineffective Chinese mig-19 facsimiles. A good number of Mirage aircraft were updated with somewhat modern avionics which multiplied the effectiveness and greatly, including the utilization of a very limited number of beyond visual range missiles (with the very restrictive employment parameters).
A number of Chengdu F7MG fighters were being procured as a stopgap measure to replace the Mig-19 aircraft. These aircraft were to be used in air superiority scenarios using Ambush and embedded tactics that could utilize the relatively good manoeuvrability of this platform. However, these were still in the process of delivery and induction.

While the F-16s were considered the most effective type in the fleet, the combat availability of these aircraft was generally suspect beyond the first few days of a conflict. This was aptly demonstrated during the 2001 stand-off between Pakistan and India in which a key requirement laid in the emergency spares by Pakistan to the United States was for the F-16.

Post-2001:
Right after September 11, the regrouping staff of the Pakistani air force (having lost some of its best officers to an air crash that same year), huddled around to evaluate the new options based on the incoming aid and the rebounding economy propped up by the technocrats. It was a consensus among the military leadership that Pakistan was about to become a competitive market for many vendors and the best way to attract the maximum attention of potential suppliers was to hold a defence exposition (IDEAS).

However, since the JF 17 program was now in full swing and some of the key decision makers in the Pakistani force were convinced that it was to form the backbone of the PAF as it brought with it the potential to form an effective air defence fighter; it was decided to focus on the glaring lack of an effective strike element within the Pakistani force.

Since the Pakistani air force had been operating the Lockheed Martin F-16 (then Gen dynamics) for almost 18 years, its first focus was to use that existing knowledge of operating what was still a very effective aircraft (in its latest guise) by inducting a number of used airframes to complete its original staff plan of having 110 F-16s forming a multi role backbone for the PAF. This was considered the most potent way to quickly regain lost ground (of which there was a lot) against its primary threat in India. Hence, the F-16 procurement programme was put immediately back on track in the months that followed the unofficial declaration of alliance with the United States. Since this process required the approval of the US Congress and Senate, budgetary allocations were made to accommodate the time required for this process.

While the F-16 was a very effective strike fighter; it was deemed it necessary based on previous experience to have a second are strike platform that could still operate well into a week of a conflict in case (which is considered a certainty) of sanctions applied by the United States due to a conflict. In addition, it was considered that the United States may not allow the purchase of a refuelling aircraft that would allow the F-16s to strike deep within the heart of Indian territory, as was required (However, the US supplied per the Pakistani request the latest generation F-16 that it could export to Pakistan with conformal fuel tanks that accommodated the range requirement)

Having evaluated and selected the Mirage 2000-5 as its primary strike element in the early 90s, the Pakistan air force was then and in 2001 convinced that the aircraft met its requirements perfectly.

In addition, the Pakistan air force had also evaluated multiple other aircraft during the sanction years, which included the Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale, SU 27, Mig-29 and had been given the chance to get first impressions of the Chinese J 10 fighter.

As they had decided on the Mirage 2000 – 5, the Pakistan air force approached the idea of meeting other vendors at the exposition as a cursory exercise. The French, however, refused to offer the Mirage 2000 and instead insisted that the Pakistan air force purchased the Rafale instead. While many conspiracy theories will be thrown about regarding the leadership of Pakistan military and its role in terms of kickbacks and corruption in trying to rig the procurement of new equipment; none of these wild (but not entirely baseless) ideas hold any salt when it comes to the selection of Pakistan’s new fighter.

Faced with a dilemma of being unable to purchase the Mirage 2000 and unable to afford the Rafale in the numbers it wanted, and unable to secure a guarantee of spares from the partner nations in the Eurofighter programme; the Pakistan air force decided to look for an out-of-the-box solution.

As they had already taken a look at the Chinese J 10 fighter and been given a preview of their plans to upgrade that aircraft, the Pakistan air force put forward a requirement to the Chengdu aircraft Corporation for modifications to the J 10 that would allow it to favourably compare with the Mirage 2000 in a strike role. In addition, just as with the JF 17 programme and other defence procurement from China; the aircraft was available immediately via a soft loan from the Chinese.

The timeline for these events is end of 2004 post the IDEAS exposition where the talks for the Mirage 2000 finally fell through. At this time the Pakistan air force was about to put on concrete plans for procuring 150 JF 17 aircraft (as the programme was maturing enough and the Pakistan air force was confident of its abilities to form the backbone of its fleet), 36 new F-16 block 52+ fighters, 45 used F-16 fighters and 48 Pakistan specific J-10 Variants. The used F-16s were to be upgraded equivalent avionics to the newer aircraft. The goal was to have by the year 2020 a fleet comprising of 110 F-16s, 110-125 JF-17s, 48-60 J-10, 60 F-7PG and 48 upgraded Mirage V strike aircraft. This would bring Pakistan air force to its desired level of around 350 combat aircraft. In addition, there was a procurement of force multiplying elements such as airborne early warning and control, airborne ground surveillance, multi layered ground-based air defence system , and unmanned intelligence gathering platforms.

The effect of the 2005 earthquake in Kashmir cannot be understated. The financial resources which were then allocated for the purchase of equipment were redirected (both justly and unjustly) two words relief and rehabilitation of the region (of which is substantial amount of money was lost to corruption). The PAF was forced to cut back the timeline for its procurement of its 36 new F-16 fighters and it chose to keep 18 as a future budgetary opening. In the years that followed, the economic policies of the technocrats lost their effectiveness at the same time when external aid was made more restrictive in its use available to the Pakistan military. However, the actual damage to the military procurement programs was undertaken during the disastrous and corruption ridden period that followed in the civilian government post Musharraf.

A systematic cannibalisation of the Pakistani state’s economic abilities was undertaken to feed the self-serving requirements of the rulers during that period. Any revenue that the state was generating was immediately directed to the offers of the ruling party, along with a scripting of any monetary “meat” from the proverbial skeleton of the Pakistani economy. The resulting deficit in the budget left the Pakistan air force scrambling to even provide basic maintenance for its aircraft. Within two years of the Pakistan People’s party government, it was clear that the PAF’s plans were finished and the best it could hope for was to sustain the programmes it had already made payments for.

This meant that by 2011 the Pakistan air force had settled on a last resort figure of 80 F-16s(both new and old), 150 Jf-17s and 50 F-7PGs by 2020. A total of 280 combat aircraft and a far cry from the ambitions it held for the higher 300 figure just a few years ago.

Yet all hope was not lost, and it was characteristic of the ever optimistic Pakistani consider a better economic turn where they would be able to exercise the options for more new and used F-16 fighters to bolster their strength until they were able to undertake the procurement of the fifth generation combat aircraft, which was to be around the mid 2020s.

In the years that followed, the focus was to try and keep up with the loan payments to be made to various lenders (with the major being in China, followed by Sweden and certain private sector lenders). This was done so that the credit rating for the Pakistan air force as a customer would improve among potential suppliers and procure more equipment if the opportunity would present itself.

Based on the latest reports that are available. Both via the Ministry of Defence production, popular aviation journals and new sites, along with official announcements; the following picture for procurement by the Pakistan air force appears:

The JF 17 programme is performing better than expected and is being relied upon to supplement those that were previously considered specific to the F-16 fleet. This has allowed greater flexibility to purchase ancillary equipment such as surface-to-air missiles, electronic warfare systems, intelligent Systems, along with stockpiling a very large number of spares for the F-16 fleet to allow it to operate even under the duress of sanctions.

The marginal improvement from the dire economic straits a a few years ago, along with the more pertinent investment shown by the Chinese has allowed the Pakistan air force to focus on multiple sources to procure secondary defence systems that are to be integrated with its air defence and long-range strike options. This also includes options to improve the airlift capability and infrastructure improvements.

Yet, there is no proof not anything beyond piecemeal statements given by civilian officials called in general are ignorant of military matters in Pakistan of any concrete development in procuring a new platform. As for now, the Pakistan air force is set on ensuring that by 2020 It will have a fleet that comprises of 80-90 F-16, 150 JF-17, 60 F-7PG and 36-48 Upgraded Mirage variants. It has decided to focus its resources on the development and procurement of a fifth-generation fighter which it intends to conduct by 2025.

To allow for any changes that can be interpreted by concrete evidence available within the news and other reliable and publicly open resources, I will be updating this from time to time.

@ghazi768 @Bilal Khan 777 @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Manticore

Any factual inaccuracies may be pointed out at will and appreciated.
Much appreciated and authentic note sir @Oscar
U must take into consideration Pakistan limited defence budget.

J-10 is far more expensive per unit given the bigger and more expensive AL-31F engines. Pakistan AF intend to replace all its A-5, Mirage III with something cheaper price unit. They need to have 250units to do the replacing.

I don't even think PLAAF operate 250 J-10units at that moment.(before 2007-9)

JF-17 is the best option for them. Plus , dew to technology transfer which Pakistan is able to learn alot of aircraft manufacturing thru this project and at the same time replace most of its aging air fleet.

It's killing 2 birds with a stone. If Pakistan is able to market successful FC-1 together with AVIC. It may even earn a small fortune to subsidise its JF-17 fleet.

JF-17 is not a bad bird after all. I saw some CCTV video of FC-1 going thru test and real air flight. It has some stunning performance of short and steep take off. Sharp turn and high maneouvre. More or less can give u some info on how good these plane is.

One Pakistan Test pilot even comment JF-17 is as good as F-16A in aerial performance.
Now jfb or block 3 will better avionics,engine and other 4++ upgraded bird will give strength and confidence of PAC capabilities for future
PAC gave strength to paf by providing jf 17 fleet on short time to make backbone of paf fleet
Now pak may acquire couples of fleet of su or mirages
As pak is looking fwd for 5+ generation jet like with TFX and most probably with Chinese 5+ in future
 
Pakistan air force is set on ensuring that by 2020 It will have a fleet that comprises of 80-90 F-16, 150 JF-17, 60 F-7PG and 36-48 Upgraded Mirage variants.

Lets assume that PAC achieve production target of 24 aircrafts per year, then it mean we will have 90 Jf17 by end of 2016. So in 2017 PAC will produce only 10 Jf17 for PAF and rest 14 will be for exports? And after 2017 we will be producing Block 3 and 50 of them in total for PAF. Right?

And a curious question, Are F7PG BVR capable? or just WVR point defense interceptors?
 
Last edited:
A nice account and overall good read though I'm not sure about the facts but I will try to them verified. However most of economic reasons and sanctions add up and are true (public knowledge). However, it is difficult to know what goes on the behind the scenes in procurement deals though I have access to some the facts.

The article points to a bigger problem with PAF rather with Pakistani society i.e. adhocism and reactionary / emergency planning. We as a nation (or our establishment) have failed to identify the long term strategic goals I don't know where to put the blame...culture, genetics, poor education, national psyche, religious clerics...but the fact is that we act late...as individuals and as the nation. We prepare for the exams in the last days, we arrive at social events late and we even get treatment for the disease the earlier stages...just look around you will find enough instances. But the precarious situation gets compounded as we do not priorities smart enough.....Why PAF had to sacrifice its budget for the Earth quake while our corrupt politicians wasted money and robbed national exchequer on daily basis. One example from Israel, Golda Meir was female PM of Israel during 1969-74, Israel had a bad economy but she signed an expensive deal with USA for defence acquisitions for which she was criticised in the parliament but she stood her ground and later she revealed her motivation " I learned this from the life of the Prophet of Islam (Muhammad (ﷺ)), when he died he had no assets not even food in home but nine swords were hanging on walls of his room"..
The history does not remember or care for how many eggs were available for the breakfast but how powerful was the nation and how it played its role in the world.
 
Last edited:
Lets assume that PAC achieve production target of 24 aircrafts per year, then it mean we will have 90 Jf17 by end of 2016. So in 2017 PAC will produce only 10 Jf17 for PAF will rest 14 will be for exports? And after 2017 we will be producing Block 3 and 50 of them in total for PAF. Right?

And a curious question, Are F7PG BVR capable? or just WVR point defense interceptors?
I cannot comment on the exact production targets for PAC as these might be available within MODP 2016 next year's book.

As for the F-7PG BVR- All I know is that they practice for BVR combat; that does imply the existence(or lack therof) of a BVR system on the PG. However, its radar only scans out to 55KM so any BVR engagements would be very limited.
 
Well I still have a lingering question in the back of my head regarding the J 10. Why was a procurement program which was in full swing come to an abrupt halt? There was this J 10 B being readied according to Pakistani inputs. Was it on technical grounds? or was it because of Finance? Was engine a main problem?

Clarified in the write-up- please go through it.

@Oscar

Very Nice and Beautiful Article ; Are Indians allowed here

I have somethings to say
Anyone is allowed here as long as the debate does not get into a parroted repetition. Agree to disagree is the wish.
 
@Oscar If I may add. Before the 2005 Earthquake, the PAF had reportedly (see Flight Global) envisaged acquiring 55 new-built F-16C/D Block-52+. The idea was that 60 F-16A/B MLU (i.e. 32 existing + 28 Peace Gate III/IV) and 55 Block-52+ would total to the originally planned fleet of ~110. I recall seeing the 55 figure numerous times in 2005, albeit unofficially through Western aviation media.

Regarding the next-generation platform. I believe it is important to understand that there is a big chance that the PAF will not procure this new fighter with the same level of transfer-of-technology as the JF-17. Given the significant investment made in the Thunder, we should expect continuous iterative updates into the long and very long-term. If the Northrop Grumman T-X prototype (Model 400) is of any indication, modern technology (e.g. composite materials, improved turbofans, modern avionics, etc) can enable legacy platforms to serve into the future. In other words, old JF-17s will be replaced by new JF-17s.

The next-gen fighter is really for the F-16s, to maintain the upper-end of the PAF fighter fleet and - presumably - build that strike element via a longer range and heavier payload platform. If the ToT aspect is not central to the program (perhaps just focused on domestic MRO and free flexibility in terms of subsystem and munitions integration), then the breadth of options is much wider. This could explain why the PAF has not jumped to the FC-31, but rather, is apparently keeping an eye on other designs, e.g. the Turkish TFX.
 
I have only three points

1) J 10 sale and purchase was very much on but the problem was AL 31 engine

Russia did nt allow for resale ( India too might have played a role )

The Visit of General Kayani to Moscow in 2012 had this agenda ie getting the
approval of AL 31 for J 10 for sale to PAF

2 )The Financial aid after 9 /11 was around 25 Billion dollars or maybe More-- till say last year

Initially ; A large part of it was used by General Musharraf to revive the economy
ie as long as he was in power

The total Remaining money was then divided by the three services

Some members assume that all 25 billion could have been used by PAF
That is not true at all

3 ) Many additional Mirage 2000s were Purchased by India after Kargil

The Mirage 2000 assembly line was open till 2007

So This statement that French refused it to PAF ; I am not sure why

May be the Price was too high
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom