There is no subtle message. You are just imagining things from your pakistani frame of reference. The fact is : there was no killings, there was no destruction of public property, there was no arson and no public was harmed. And I'll also say how they actually protested : they filed FIRs all over India and brought MF Husain to court letting law take its due process.
Ahan, so there were no death threats? No harassment and intimidation by the like of Bajran Dal? But as no one was killed, so everything (including the threats) was justified, right?
Hmm..i can now see what exactly are you trying to say here.
Who said that ? Don't put words into my mouth. Your country man kills a fellow Muslim Pakistani in the name of protest and Ishq-e-Rasool and you want me to sympathize for that ? Wow. Why should I even care what you Pakistanis do to each other ?
And hence my point, value of lives doesnt matter, what matters is who kills who, right?
Is that what Hinduism had taught you guys.
Ghandi was a pacifist, i think.
BTW, Muslims in india are also pelting stones and stuff, now that wouldnt matter to you as they are Muslims who are doing it, not Indians, right?
That's your internal business which I have no rights in commenting. My only concern is that your animosity does not spill outside your borders into other countries.
^^ Unfortunately, it's already in your country.
But that wouldnt matter, as long as Muslims are commiting the crimes (even if they are indians) you would remain indifferent, i hope i have read you correctly?
I'll repost one of my again :
If the so called sane Muslims dont wean their fundamentalist brothers from evils way and instead remain mum, then there is no point in complaining about generalization. Period.
Your post is just another BS trying to the demonize the Muslims as a whole.
You qouted post lost value when you were not sure if the 'moderate' Muslims were real or 'so-called'
