What's new

Muslim restaurateur renames eatery, replaces Muslim staff with Hindus in Mathura

Muslims aren't obliged to follow unjust laws.

They will continue to slaughter and consume Cows.
They why do you object when someone burns quran,
They day Muslims are ok with cartoons and burning quran , people will stop whining about cow slaughters,

you cannot have different scale for different people
 
For sake of harmony and respecting the the views of the majority, to begin with ?

I've never complained of lack of bacon when in the middle east or lack of beef or alcy when in most areas of India, Pushkar (lovely town, btw) jao.. bhot mushkil se chicken tak milega, if at all, no beer etc either.. the same applies to clothing and so on.. why is it so hard to be mindful of local sensibilities ? Let people be the way they are.. or, when in Rome, as you please.

You're also an extremely low iq troll, go wrestle with someone your own size.. chal phut bc, no time for low iq folk like you..
The when in Rome thing would apply...if the country u r in claimed something and followed through on it...
...if a country claims to be something and follows a different path...ppl would rightly complain about that.

When u give the example of middle eastern countries(mainly Muslims majority) and u not being able to eat bacon...
...well that's expected...those countries claim to be "Islamic"...they do not claim to be "secular"...so when their laws cater to Muslims...it matches up with what they claim.

US claims to be secular...and u can literally have a Muslim buying/cooking/eating beef and right next door a Hindu worshipping an idol.
...and the state does not interfere nor bother either of them even though both of them are simultaneously going against the other's beliefs and neither of them take any action against the other bcuz they know that they live in a secular state where the law allows each of them their religious freedom.

If India claims to be "secular" it should not favor any one religion over the other...regardless of any of them being in majority. If u choose to do so...then just declare India a Hindu Republic. Until then...anyone having their religious beliefs limited to please another group...for the sake of "majority" has the right to complain bcuz they were led to believe otherwise about the country where they live.
 
They why do you object when someone burns quran,
They day Muslims are ok with cartoons and burning quran , people will stop whining about cow slaughters,

you cannot have different scale for different people
Because burning Qur'an is wrong.

Eating Cows is okay
 
He did it out of survival can't blame the poor guy. But why get rid of the workers?
Change the menu but sack people.


I guess the area is so bigoted that Hindus would not frequent the place if the workers were Muslims.

This is what India has become in 2022.
 
Pakistan needs to act now and save Indian Muslims !!!!!

Indian Muslims had the choice to move but instead chose to stay. The subservience and passiveness of those that remained only proved Jinnah right.

Now after 3 generations Pakistan is no longer a state for the Muslims of South Asia, but a state for Pakistanis. So Pakistan should not fight Indian Muslims fights for them.
 
I guess the area is so bigoted that Hindus would not frequent the place if the workers were Muslims.

This is what India has become in 2022.

No Hindu wants food with liberal serving of spit.

Anybody sensible will avoid eating in places where there is an chance of being served food with spit.




I am guessing we have different Standards.
 
He did it out of survival can't blame the poor guy. But why get rid of the workers?
Change the menu but sack people.
This is making Muslims move to isolated Muslim ghettos.
Pace of extreme oppressive acts have increased manifold in Occupied Palestine, Occupied Kashmir, and against Muslims in India.
Biggest wars have already started.
 
There is no law on "consuming beef". There is law on cow slaughter.

Details matter.
How would one consume beef without slaughtering the cow? Run after a live cow and gulp it down with a glass of water?

Article 48 of the Constitution of India is one of the Directive Principles which directs the state to make efforts for banning animal slaughtering of cows.

This can bring into force cow slaughter bills even in goa and kerala when the time is right.
I am aware of the Directive principles of state policy. They are not actual laws, but - wait for it - directive principles.

Banning cow slaughter is a state subject, and therefore, as I wrote earlier, not "Indian law".
IF people have the right to speak up, people also have the right to ask intolerant bigots to migrate to pakistan.

Free speech is a two way street.
Who is the intolerant bigot here? The person who advocates for freedom of choice regarding culinary issues, or the person trying to mandate what others may or may not eat?

And sure, you have a right to ask others to move to Pakistan - and those others have a right to (and will) tell you to go to Jericho.

Finally Criticizing and trying to change unjust laws that allow Cow slaughter is part of the DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLE and the will of the majority Hindus of India.
It doesn't matter if it is the will of the majority. Democracies have explicit mandates to prevent what is called the "Tyranny of the majority". Certain rights are universal, and cannot be voted away.

If you do not want to eat beef, don't eat beef. Don't tell others what to eat or not to eat.
 

Back
Top Bottom